S
Straw
Guest
And of course in making this error I have completely overlooked what Jerome Nadel said when announcing the partnership with SiFive:
“We are pleased to partner with SiFive and have the opportunity to have our Akida technology integrated with their market-leading product offerings, creating an efficient combination for edge compute,” said Jerome Nadel, BrainChip CMO. “As we expand our ecosystem of portfolio partners, we want to be sure that these relationships are built on complementary technologies, enabling capabilities, and breadth of environments so that we can expand opportunities to as many potential customers as possible. Driving our technology into a SiFive-based subsystem is exactly the type of partnership that meets these goals.”
In mitigation of any penalty that you might impose on me I had allowed myself to be influenced by anonymous micro opinions expressed here that cast doubt on the depth of the relationship.
However @Diogenese after reading your post and returning to the primary source being the actual statements by the two partnering companies the big picture has been once again revealed.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA

It feels like they have some foundations established in turbulent times.
The more I see what companies are trying to do, to me, the more ridiculously practical Akida looks.
Generally speaking autonomous driving, surgical smell scalpel to the Tesla bot. It's all exciting to me.
I think the equity issues surrounding Elon's AI economic abundance still needs some serious focus (no dude... not everyone can just
buy Tesla shares, the equivalent is a financial autocracy; the more money, the more say (and that horse has bolted and the darn thing just can't be broken) - the guy seems ok but I do feel being a billionaire puts you a little out of touch with the financial pressures on 99.9999% of the population. Holding BRN for 7 years has exacted a significant time/mental trauma toll regardless of the financial outcome for me to date which has been extremely positive. This is in no way a judgement on the company itself from which the opportunity sprang (and ironically the ASX).
People more on my end of the socioeconomic spectrum who will more likely be negatively affected by AI economics need something akin to an ironclad constitutional right to benefit from AI economic abundance (ie, which atm to me means free time to spend the money I may not have with no essential services unless I'm directly contributing to the furthering of that abundance through my employment or stake in a company).
Whether the means of production becoming predominantly physically and intelligently AI is based on the political ideology of those in power, the needs of an aging first world population or all those other reasons we can't possibly predict; something needs to give.
I'd like to think that the equity of existence/knowledge/interaction in a human society is positively affected by a guaranteed personal enabler of AI. Maybe the AI singularity will one day accidentally 'conspire' to remind all humans no matter our psychology that we need to grow together and work through our real or imagined fears/traumas.
PF: Oh man that's deep. A little opinionated.... and did you say 'whom'?!
Anyway at the very least I hope this is entertaining.