Pure Play Opportunity

stuart888

Regular
@unix was first to nicely highlight Innatera Nanosystems as a newbie startup competitor. Brainchip does have an article that mentions Innatera briefly here. The Innatera CEO speaks on the same topics, focus, solutions as Brainchip. Perhaps this is one of the companies 3 or 5 years behind, or further with patents.

CEO Sumeet Kumar: Ultra-low Power Pattern Recognition with Spiking Neural Networks.

Hope this helps, Stuart


 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

jtardif999

Regular
Now a more serious response to this important post reminding us all of the singular opportunity that Brainchip presents to early investors on the ASX.

In saying early investors I am personally referencing timing not price.

Think about all the stars of the investment world. All the ones that feature in the if only catagory. Companies like Berkshire Hathaway, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, IBM, Nvidia, Tesla, Google, CSL, Rio Tinto, BHP etc;

Anyone who timed their purchase at any time before commercial traction appeared in their balance sheets clearly bought at the absolutely no doubt about it the right time.

Why was then the right time because they bought for absolute bargain basement prices all the future potential. In some cases that future potential came absolutely free of charge because traditional methodology used to value shares does not input potential.

Those who waited until the balance sheets reflected the potential paid the full price for the potential because it was now able to be put into a calculator and priced by bean counters and analysts.

Did those first investors take a risk yes but the risk was one which diminished as each company moved along the pathway to commercialisation.

In Brainchip’s case those who bought in 2015 took an enormous risk, no product just an idea in the minds of a pair of genius inventors and visionaries. They were investing in gossamer.

As time moved on the gossamer became tangible and the risk diminished up to the present date where Brainchip sits as a global technology company with a three year lead, patent moat, customers, proven market ready products, world class sales and marketing people, an ARM proven business model, a best in class CFO, a future product development time line and still no actual numbers on the balance sheet sufficient for the bean counters and analysts to use to provide the valuations that will destroy the present opportunity.

At the 2021 Ai Field Day Anil Mankar said the following:

“We have on chip learning, and that is the differentiation of AKIDA compared to everybody else who is trying to do Ai analytics inference on device…every sensor has a right to be able to analyse its own data…we created circuits and solutions that a robot can actually feel, and process all the sensor modalities.”

So I say to all shareholders of course there is risk but think about the value of the unrealised potential and where Brainchip stands on the diminishing opportunity to invest timeline and the fact that it is the only pure play Ai technology company in the world where retail investors can take that risk.

I personally consider myself to be akin to a venture capital provider as I have been given a privilege which normally is only extended to the very rich and those who are on the inside. Brainchip is my exclusive opportunity.

I could of course be entirely wrong but that is not my opinion.

So remember I am just an anonymous poster like everyone else. I am biased in favour of Brainchip which is obvious so not to be trusted unless you do your own research and confirm what I have to say to your satisfaction.

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
Just re-read and I have to say, those that bought in in 2015 were taking the greatest risk, but it was not just buying an idea - the 2008 foundation patent and a working prototype of the tech were not just ideas, they were real enough to convince me in early 16 to take a position. Even as a prototype the tech was incredible and you could see it’s potential. At that time PVMD et al we’re convinced they would be able to sell the IP and they were selling investors on that as a plan. It certainly was not just gossamer back then. AIMO.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 8 users

toasty

Regular
Just re-read and I have to say, those that bought in in 2015 were taking the greatest risk, but it was not just buying an idea - the 2008 foundation patent and a working prototype of the tech were not just ideas, they were real enough to convince me in early 16 to take a position. Even as a prototype the tech was incredible and you could see it’s potential. At that time PVMD et al we’re convinced they would be able to sell the IP and they were selling investors on that as a plan. It certainly was not just gossamer back then. AIMO.
Agree it was a huge risk when I first bought in in 2016. Only picked up a relatively small parcel back then but as things progressed it became obvious to me that this was indeed a genuine game changing technology. I bought on the dips through to 2019 and accumulated a little over 300,000 shares at an average of $0.126. Been sitting patiently since. I've always been prepared to take a calculated risk but this one is different - for some reason I could see from early on that this technology was going to change the face of the tech world. Glad I did....... :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18 users

jtardif999

Regular
Agree it was a huge risk when I first bought in in 2016. Only picked up a relatively small parcel back then but as things progressed it became obvious to me that this was indeed a genuine game changing technology. I bought on the dips through to 2019 and accumulated a little over 300,000 shares at an average of $0.126. Been sitting patiently since. I've always been prepared to take a calculated risk but this one is different - for some reason I could see from early on that this technology was going to change the face of the tech world. Glad I did....... :cool:
Yep, same, first parcel was small and then started to accumulate as the tech slowly de-risked and the dips came along - over about 4 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
Top Bottom