IS TMH A TRAP FOR HOLDERS??
- Thread starter DingoBorat
- Start date
BaconLover
Founding Member
Not looking mint atm. It was pumped too hard in early 2021 so should settle and find some support. Looking at the volume holders and stuck and will be a very slow painful downtrend.
Coupled with not so attractive fundamentals at play having very low activity in their websites, and a chart with no visible support, this is a recipe for disaster.
I am treading very carefully in these waters by staying on the bank. Capital protection comes first. DYOR.
My opinion only, not financial advice.
Coupled with not so attractive fundamentals at play having very low activity in their websites, and a chart with no visible support, this is a recipe for disaster.
I am treading very carefully in these waters by staying on the bank. Capital protection comes first. DYOR.
My opinion only, not financial advice.
BaconLover
Founding Member
I am not doing it. They are destroying their company themselves, not wasting my money lol
wilzy123
Founding Member
Yep, it's a sell for me. What even is a market herald anyway?
DingoBorat
Slim
I have a hypothesis, on how TMH runs hotcrapper, which is along the lines of..
At some point, hotcrapper (from now on HC) decided a "conflict model", was a good way to increase discussions and forum visits.
Paid employees of HC, were given assignments, to debate and offer alternative views, on popular companies, to increase posts and discussion, increasing traffic and making advertising, more attractive to marketers.
Somewhere along the line, when "downramping" these stocks, they realised, that the negative sentiment being created, was actually influencing the share price (such was the reach and use, of HC, by retail investors).
At some further point, either the managers or owners, of HC, or associates of theirs, saw the opportunity, to make money from the influence of HC on retail holders.
This is where, paid downramping and trolling, became used as a tool, beyond their "conflict model", on select "target companies" to make money, using the leverage of shorting.
At some further point again, the pinning of ***************** articles, was added to the mix, using tabloidly, derogatory, inventive and dramatic journalism, to cast the company in a bad light and negatively impact sentiment.
This pinning is always accompanied by, an increase in shorting, as well as an increase in both paid "intelligent?" downrampers and less intelligent, troll minions, aimed at disrupting and overpowering, constructive discussions on the threads, of the target company.
This appears to have been a successful strategy, as TMH revenues, dramatically increased, from full year 2020, to full year 2021.
That is until, they encountered Brainchip.
But of course, the story of this hypothesis, of TMH or associates, shorting BRN in particular, while using HC and articles published by TMH, as tools to manipulate the market, is not over yet..
I want to stress, that this is just a hypothesis, nothing more!
I would however, appreciate any help, from anyone, with links to similar articles and the dates they were pinned, onto other stocks, for further study
I remember someone saying Novonix (NVX) has also been a target?
My opinions only.
At some point, hotcrapper (from now on HC) decided a "conflict model", was a good way to increase discussions and forum visits.
Paid employees of HC, were given assignments, to debate and offer alternative views, on popular companies, to increase posts and discussion, increasing traffic and making advertising, more attractive to marketers.
Somewhere along the line, when "downramping" these stocks, they realised, that the negative sentiment being created, was actually influencing the share price (such was the reach and use, of HC, by retail investors).
At some further point, either the managers or owners, of HC, or associates of theirs, saw the opportunity, to make money from the influence of HC on retail holders.
This is where, paid downramping and trolling, became used as a tool, beyond their "conflict model", on select "target companies" to make money, using the leverage of shorting.
At some further point again, the pinning of ***************** articles, was added to the mix, using tabloidly, derogatory, inventive and dramatic journalism, to cast the company in a bad light and negatively impact sentiment.
This pinning is always accompanied by, an increase in shorting, as well as an increase in both paid "intelligent?" downrampers and less intelligent, troll minions, aimed at disrupting and overpowering, constructive discussions on the threads, of the target company.
This appears to have been a successful strategy, as TMH revenues, dramatically increased, from full year 2020, to full year 2021.
That is until, they encountered Brainchip.
But of course, the story of this hypothesis, of TMH or associates, shorting BRN in particular, while using HC and articles published by TMH, as tools to manipulate the market, is not over yet..
I want to stress, that this is just a hypothesis, nothing more!
I would however, appreciate any help, from anyone, with links to similar articles and the dates they were pinned, onto other stocks, for further study
I remember someone saying Novonix (NVX) has also been a target?
My opinions only.
Last edited:
BaconLover
Founding Member
MNS and EM1 are two that I know/heard of they pinned articles on top. There are a couple more but I will need to think, bit hard when I am half pissed.I have a hypothesis, on how THH runs hotcrapper, which is along the lines of..
At some point, hotcrapper (from now on HC) decided a "conflict model", was a good way to increase discussions and forum visits.
Paid employees of HC, were given assignments, to debate and offer alternative views, on popular companies, to increase posts and discussion, increasing traffic and making advertising, more attractive to marketers.
Somewhere along the line, when "downramping" these stocks, they realised, that the negative sentiment being created, was actually influencing the share price (such was the reach and use, of HC, by retail investors).
At some further point, either the managers or owners, of HC, or associates of theirs, saw the opportunity, to make money from the influence of HC on retail holders.
This is where, paid downramping and trolling, became used as a tool, beyond their "conflict model", on select "target companies" to make money, using the leverage of shorting.
At some further point again, the pinning of ***************** articles, was added to the mix, using tabloidly, derogatory, inventive and dramatic journalism, to cast the company in a bad light and negatively impact sentiment.
This pinning is always accompanied by, an increase in shorting, as well as an increase in both paid "intelligent?" downrampers and less intelligent, troll minions, aimed at disrupting and overpowering, constructive discussions on the threads, of the target company.
This appears to have been a successful strategy, as TMH revenues, dramatically increased, from full year 2020, to full year 2021.
That is until, they encountered Brainchip.
But of course, the story of this hypothesis, of TMH or associates, shorting BRN, while using HC and articles published by TMH, as a tool to manipulate the market, is not over yet..
I want to stress, that this is just a hypothesis, nothing more!
I would however, appreciate any help, from anyone, with links to similar articles and the dates they were pinned, onto other stocks, for further study
I remember someone saying Novonix (NVX) has also been a target?
My opinions only.
DingoBorat
Slim
Ideally, it would be good to have-
The dates the articles were published and pinned and the duration of pinning.
The figures of any increase in shorting activity at that time.
Evidence of increased trolling by the "No sentiment, non holding, non trading, non shorting, non paid" type, as well as their minions.
And charting history, during the time of the attacks.
To be all, correlated and compiled together, into the separate examples, to see if there is a definite pattern..
BaconLover
Founding Member
@kenjikool
hey buddy what's your opinion on this?
hey buddy what's your opinion on this?
DingoBorat
Slim
But of course
They fit the "target" parameters perfectly!
High interest in the stock, high market capitalisation and low "fundamentals", by pure economic standards.
kenjikool
Regular
I do believe that media outlets like the TMH are paid to do articles for others. ISX was a clear example of this, but I believe it became personal so the AFR couldn't let it go. I now feel very comfortable in feeling that TMH would have taken a payment to write articles in a negative light. BRN to me was very clear on this. The way it was written (poorly IMO) was not a fair or open look at the company. As Rexryan (aka kenjikool) posted, the fact that they could have written a great encouraging price on a great new Australian start up with amazing potential shows that they wanted a negative article and then you have to ask the question why? ISX had a very loud and arrogant CEO in JK IMO so ruffled some feathers. But BRN is going about it's business and as far as I can see an upfront honest bunch of guys doin their thing. changing the face of an industry. they haven't ruffled any feathers, so why write negative articles if you don't have an agenda?
Don't get me started on proxy advisors lol. Especially Ownership Matters. They write reports for shorters 100%.
BaconLover
Founding Member
Was trading at 45 cents in the morning and someone pumped it onto 58 cents lol. Volume? well, next to nothing.
Funny how even a few dollars worth of shares can give you a wrong picture.
Trade carefully on this stock. Many holders are stuck on this one, very highly illiquid so once you are in, it is a nightmare to sell out.
Next support is around 32 cent mark, if it doesn't hold, which i think it won't, hardly any interest in this company's ownership on the market it could go lower to the 20s..
. (Unless someone spends another $2000 and pumps it another 8% LOL) but not sure if they'd be able to do it everyday. I mean, surely their salary isn't that flash.Of course this is my opinion only and I am not a financial advisor, so dyor. Alternate views welcome, happy to see both POV.
DingoBorat
Slim
Yeah I noticed that today BaconLover..
Their report was pretty disappointing at a glance..
Was definitely pumped today, to maintain the Market Cap, in my opinion.
I think the Top 20 shareholders, hold 90% (mostly management), if I recall correctly from discussions with shareholders on HC..
So they have good reason, to maintain it..
My opinions only.
Their report was pretty disappointing at a glance..
Was definitely pumped today, to maintain the Market Cap, in my opinion.
I think the Top 20 shareholders, hold 90% (mostly management), if I recall correctly from discussions with shareholders on HC..
So they have good reason, to maintain it..
My opinions only.
BaconLover
Founding Member
$100 million dollar public company, gone up 7.41% on approx $2000 trade. LOL
I would say, considering the increased competition, their next report would be even more dampening? Will have to wait and see.
Just a share that I follow based on curiosity. Not intending to buy, because once I buy, I know I will be stuck for ever. But stocks like these give us a great opportunity to learn and improve ourselves.
(And yes Top 20 owns 96.4% last time I checked.. ????Would we see a change in directors notice in two days lol Mr/s xxxx bought 5000 shares. bullish
)
DingoBorat
Slim
I think the answer, to the question asked in the thread title, is an affirmative YES..$100 million dollar public company, gone up 7.41% on approx $2000 trade. LOL
I would say, considering the increased competition, their next report would be even more dampening? Will have to wait and see.
Just a share that I follow based on curiosity. Not intending to buy, because once I buy, I know I will be stuck for ever. But stocks like these give us a great opportunity to learn and improve ourselves.
(And yes Top 20 owns 96.4% last time I checked.. ????Would we see a change in directors notice in two days lol Mr/s xxxx bought 5000 shares. bullish
The share price was low 60 cents..
Now 48 cents, with hardly any bids at lower prices..
Oh dear...
Attachments
wilzy123
Founding Member
Similar threads
