International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)

Dave Evans

Regular
13/11/2023
9cardomaha posted


First domino to fall is now looking like the increased emergency injunction, which conveninently is 24th Nov. Cominiere managed to delay submissions to 9th of November... + 15 days, whoops missed the AGM.

They didn't even do anything particularly clever, just copped the late submission fine of a few thousand euros - paid for by Z. But at least it gives a bad impression for the arbitrator who was already favouring AVZ.

DLA Piper earning their keep, and doubling down on the favourable ruling for 50k penalty - in the modified injunction are things like rolling back 15775, verdict on hydro and increasing penalty to 150k as i've mentioned. Everyone worried about enforcement needs to understand how injunctions with penalties work.....

The injunction is provisional and will continue to count upward until AVZ decides to go before a tribunal to enforce. Once it is enforced, the counter stops and we are paid whatever sum we are owed, along with any verdicts which are stipulated in the injunction. ICC has a very high enforcement rate for injunctions and only under extreme circumstances does an injunction not get enforced when it goes to tribunal.

As for monetary fines, these are placed on Cominiere but ICC's jurisdiction gives it power over all major international financial institutions. So Z wants to pay money to C.... it'll get flagged and paid to AVZ until the fines are all paid off. So the money is going to come our way regardless... not optimal but could be fucking worse.

On ownership rights, ICC are a little weaker, the judgements need to be taken back to local DRC courts for enforcement.... this is a pretty big issue because i don't think anyone here trusts the DRC judicial system. But silver lining is, if DRC local courts refuse to enforce, we have grounds to recalculate to monetary damages, and the ICC can just continue adding to the monetary penalty. Again, not optimal but better than nothing.

My assumption is that if we can get the monetary penalty high enough upon enforcement, then Cominiere can't pay and Z doesn't want to foot the bill, then we can negotiate something.

On another note, we submitted an emergency request to have the 15% ICC case withdrawn. Z has managed to delay that to early decemember
 

Dave Evans

Regular
15/11/3023
Carlos Posted


For Dathomir it is the DRC supreme court

20231115_181858.png


Even the MoP recognises this matter needs to be decided by the ICC

20231115_181728.jpg


I'd imagine it is the same for the DRC government illegally cancelling our mining licence and then Cominiere subsequently illegally taking our tenement off us

Hopefully the DRC supreme court has more respect for the mining code and the Dathcom JVA than the lower courts have shown so far
 

Dave Evans

Regular
17/11/2023
Samus Posted

LykShares

Breaking News: AVZ Minerals Scores Victory in ICC Arbitration with Cominière

Breaking News: AVZ Minerals Scores Victory in ICC Arbitration with Cominière
AVZ Minerals Successfully Restraints Cominière in Ongoing ICC Arbitration

In a continued battle against La Congolese D’Exploitation Minière (Cominière), AVZ Minerals is making significant progress. The company has obtained emergency relief and additional updates from the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in Paris concerning its joint venture agreement with Dathcom Mining SA (Dathcom). This latest development further solidifies AVZ's position and restrains Cominière from implementing its purported termination.

Imposing Penalty on Cominière

Back in May 2023, AVZ's subsidiaries secured emergency relief from the ICC, ordering Cominière to pay a penalty of €50,000 per day if it attempted to terminate the joint venture agreement with Dathcom. However, despite the initial ruling, Cominière proceeded with its purported termination of the agreement, prompting AVZ's subsidiaries to apply for further emergency relief.

ICC's Decision and Ruling

On November 9, 2023, AVZ's application for additional emergency relief was heard by the ICC. Six days later, on November 15, the ICC emergency arbitrator rendered a favorable decision in AVZ's favor. The ruling outlined the following orders against Cominière:

Cominière must refrain from exploring and exploiting PR 13359 and PR 15775, directly or indirectly, until the ICC tribunal in charge of determining the validity of the termination of the Dathcom joint venture agreement evaluates the matter.
Cominière is obligated to pay a fine of €50,000 per day for any non-compliance with the aforementioned order.
Cominière is responsible for covering the ICC's administrative costs and a portion of the legal costs incurred by AVZ's subsidiaries.

Furthermore, the ICC emergency arbitrator rejected Cominière's request to set aside the emergency order issued on May 5, 2023. Consequently, the daily penalty of €50,000 for non-compliance with the initial emergency order remains in effect, while the new penalty for non-compliance with the latest ruling is now being added.

AVZ's Continued Efforts

AVZ Minerals is pleased with the latest development in the ongoing ICC arbitration proceedings against Cominière. The company remains steadfast in protecting its joint venture agreement with Dathcom and preventing any actions that could jeopardize its interests. AVZ continues to diligently pursue its legal rights and will closely monitor Cominière's conduct moving forward.

Looking Ahead

With the ICC emergency arbitrator's recent ruling and penalties imposed on Cominière, AVZ Minerals is confident in its ability to maintain the integrity of its joint venture agreement with Dathcom. As the arbitration process progresses, AVZ will remain dedicated to securing a favorable outcome and safeguarding its position in the ongoing legal dispute.

In conclusion, AVZ Minerals Limited has effectively restrained Cominière from implementing its purported termination of the joint venture agreement with Dathcom. Through the recent ICC emergency arbitrator ruling and the imposed penalties, AVZ showcases its commitment to upholding its rights and protecting its joint venture interests. The company looks forward to gaining further ground in the ongoing arbitration proceedings and ensuring a fair resolution.

https://lykshares.com/post/breaking...-in-icc/d1573a51-540a-4cd7-9198-c8d2d8276be6/
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Xerof

Money DSOTM 1973
Here's the full 62 page ICC publication translated to Anglaise
from 15/11/23, thanks to 9card
 

Attachments

  • ICC 27720 SP (EA)-15-11-23.pdf
    1.8 MB · Views: 62
  • Fire
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

Dave Evans

Regular

Dave Evans

Regular
20/11/2023
Sam Posted

Emergency measures of the International Chamber of Commerce against La Cominière SA and Manono Lithium: “The order of November 15, 2023 of the CCI blocks La Cominière and Zijin on Manono Lithium, protects the rights of Dathcom and AVZ on the entire License 13359 ".​

Emergency measures of the International Chamber of Commerce against La Cominière SA and Manono Lithium: “The order of November 15, 2023 of the CCI blocks La Cominière and Zijin on Manono Lithium, protects the rights of Dathcom and AVZ on the entire License 13359 .


In its press release to shareholders of November 17, 2023, the Australian company AVZ, which is in partnership with Cominière and Dathomir in Dathcom Mining which has attracted the gluttonous appetites of the Chinese since 2021, informs that its subsidiaries have previously obtained orders for measures of emergency of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in Paris against La Congolaise d'Exploitation Minière (Cominière) imposing a penalty of €50,000 per day if Cominière took measures to implement its alleged termination of the agreement joint venture with respect to Dathcom Mining SA (Dathcom and Dathcom JVA) as was mentioned in the Australian Stock Exchange announcement of May 8, 2023 entitled ''Favorable decision in the emergency arbitration proceedings of the CCI''.

La Cominière subsequently took steps to implement its purported termination of the joint venture agreement with respect to Dathcom JVA.

Consequently, on October 30, 2023, the AVZ subsidiaries submitted a new emergency measure to the CCI against Cominière.


The application was heard on November 9, 2023. AVZ is pleased to announce that, on November 15, 2023, the ICC Emergency Arbitrator ordered that:
1. Cominière shall not take any action to explore and exploit, directly or indirectly, within the scope of PR 13359 and PR 15775 until the ICC tribunal responsible for determining the validity of the termination of the partnership agreement Dathcom hears this question;
2. Cominière pays a fine of €50,000 per day for any non-compliance with the order referred to in paragraph 1; And
3. Cominière must pay the administrative costs of the CCI and part of the legal costs of the AVZ subsidiaries. The ICC emergency arbitrator also rejected Cominière's request to annul the emergency order dated May 5, 2023. Thus, the final daily penalty of €50,000 is added to the initial daily penalty. of €50,000 under the first emergency order against Cominière dated May 5, 2023.

In light of Cominière's behavior to date, AVZ notes that the initial daily penalty of €50,000 continues to accumulate.



Among other conclusions, the emergency arbitrator of the Court of Arbitration:
• concluded that Cominière had deliberately concealed that it had requested and obtained a decision from the High Court of Kalemie in the DRC on May 3, 2023 regarding the alleged dissolution of Dathcom; and • indicated that Cominière's position on the termination of the joint agreement founding the Dathcom partnership was apparently based on an erroneous interpretation of article 18.3 of the Dathcom joint agreement.

Provisional measures against Dathomir of Simon Cong, spoiled child of Dathcom according to a report from the General Inspectorate of Finance (IGF)

AVZ and AVZI previously requested interim measures to preserve the status quo, including an injunction requiring Dathomir to:
• withdraw the request for dissolution of Dathcom before the Lubumbashi commercial court; and • comply with the arbitration clause of the APS 2020 and, in particular, refrain from bringing any action before a local court in the DRC for reasons prejudging the issues at stake in the ICC arbitration procedure.

AVZ announces that, as part of the request for interim measures, the tribunal of the Arbitral Court ordered that:
• Dathomir files its defense on November 17, 2023;
• AVZ and AVZI submit all their responses on November 27, 2023; And
• Dathomir will file its reply on December 7, 2023. The tribunal of the Court of Arbitration indicated that it would rule on AVZ and AVZI's request for precautionary measures on December 19, 2023.
Regarding the broader arbitration proceedings against Dathomir:
• AVZ and AVZI each confirm that they filed their declaration on November 11, 2023 (on the merits of the ICC arbitration proceedings (ICC No. 27401/SP).
• Dathomir's defense is due to be filed on March 4, 2024.

Update on the arbitration of Jin Cheng, Zijin subsidiary with gluttonous appetites
Furthermore, AVZ received the ICC-approved Procedural Timetable for the ICC Arbitration Procedure (ICC No. 26986/SP) issued by Jin Cheng Mining Company (Jin Cheng), a subsidiary of Zijin Mining Group Ltd, which falsely alleges that it acquired a 15% stake in Dathcom from Cominière despite the fact that Cominière did not comply with the provisions relating to pre-emption rights of the Dathcom JVA. The main steps are summarized below:
• post-hearing briefs will be filed on November 24, 2023;
• the filing of the bill of costs on December 8, 2023; And
• subject to the procedure, the draft sentence will be submitted to the ICC at the end of January 2024.

As previously stated in all its statements and correspondence to Congolese institutions and courts, AVZ is confident that AVZI's jurisdictional challenge will be successful, which will confirm that Jin Cheng does not have the right to initiate the ICC arbitration proceedings against AVZI on the grounds that it is a putative shareholder of Dathcom.

Arbitral recourse in the Congolese Mining Code revised in 2018 and AVZ referrals
In their narrative, the current general management of Cominière and certain Congolese officials claim that AVZ and AVZI destroyed trust and betrayed the country by resorting to international arbitration to decide between them and its partners in Dathcom Mining on various disputes between them. They forget that Cominière and his partner Zijin also took international arbitration against AVZ regarding Dathcom, a sort of self-flagellation if not turpitude in the eyes of the law.

However, a non-partisan reading of the Congolese Mining Code revised and promulgated in 2018 by the President of the Republic after adoption by the parliament (National Senate Assembly) of the DRC, neither Australian nor foreign, provides for the use of internal arbitration and at the international level under specific conditions and for specific reasons.
Here is the provision and the economy below:

Article 317 entitled ''Arbitration'' says this:
''Subject to the provisions relating to administrative and judicial recourse, breaches, penalties and sanctions provided for in this Code, disputes which may arise from the interpretation or application of the provisions of this Code may be settled by means of 'arbitration provided for in articles 318 to 320 of this Code.''

Article 318 on ''Internal arbitration'' says this:
''Disputes resulting from the interpretation or application of the provisions of this Code are subject to arbitration according to the procedure provided for in the provisions of articles 159 to 174 of the Congolese Civil Procedure Code.''

Article 319 on ''International arbitration'' says this:
''Notwithstanding the provisions of article 318 of this Code, disputes that may arise during the interpretation or application of the provisions of this Code may be settled, at the request of the most diligent party , by means of arbitration in accordance with the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States, on the condition that the holder is a National of another contracting State under the terms of article 25 of the said agreement.

Due to the acceptance of the delivery of the mining or quarry title by the Mining Cadastre, the holder is deemed to have automatically given his consent to such arbitration in accordance with the said agreement and expresses it both in his name and in that of its affiliated companies. It further accepts that such an affiliated company shall be considered a national of the State of which the Investor is a national of another Contracting State.

If the investor has made his investment through an affiliated company under Congolese law, such a company is considered, for the purposes of the ICSID Convention, to be a national of the State of which the Investor is a national.

Without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph 5 of this article, holders who are not nationals of another Contracting State may submit disputes arising during the interpretation or application of the provisions of this Code to any competent arbitral tribunal of their choice provided that this tribunal is not governed by the laws of their country and does not sit there.

Holders who are not nationals of another Contracting State notify the Mining Cadastre of the names, contact details and rules of three arbitral tribunals chosen by them, within thirty days of the issuance of the mining title. The State approves an arbitral tribunal among the three proposed, subject to it objecting, for the reasons mentioned in the preceding paragraph in fine, within three months from the date of notification of the choice of courts. arbitrators.

In the absence of approval or objection by the State within the three-month period, the holder notifies the Mining Cadastre within thirty days of the arbitral tribunal of its choice among the three proposed.''


Article 320 on ''Arbitration rules and decisions''regarding arbitration decisions, judgments and orders says that they are enforceable in the Democratic Republic of Congo :

''In accordance with the previous article, the arbitration is carried out in French at the place agreed by the State and the holder.

For the purposes of arbitration, the arbitral body shall refer to the provisions of this Code, the laws of the Democratic Republic of Congo and its own rules of procedure. The decisions rendered by the arbitrator are enforceable and their execution may be requested before any competent court in the National Territory according to the form provided for by the Congolese Code of Civil Procedure or in the country to which the holder belongs. In the event of application of the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the State waives the right to avail itself of any immunity from jurisdiction or execution.''


Finally, Article 322 regarding ''The service of procedural documents'' clearly stipulates that: ''Any appeal, any judgment, any judgment and other procedural documents are served on the State at the Office of the Minister or at the Office of its local representation. Any service made in any other place in the National Territory or abroad is null and void.''

For Congolese civil society and especially the TOUS POUR LA DRC Coalition which has been closely following the issue for years, the only solution is " an arrangement outside of legal proceedings between Cominière and AVZ in order to develop the Dathcom mining project without the Chinese from Zijin , who must develop the Kabamba Mining partnership and without Dathomir taking into account the IGF Report and the clauses of the partnership agreement. This will protect the interests of all and especially of the country and the population of Manono without wasting time and money in court, given the unviable financial situation of Cominière which has no partnership in production to date. whereas Dathcom should have been there since July 2023 if there had not been artificial blockages.''

By Ben Nkaya for FKF Softpress

 

Dave Evans

Regular
20/11/2023
Sam Posted




The Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce of Paris blocks @cominiereSA, Zijin and Manono Lithium in the meantime and rules in favor of @AvzMinerals. Its decisions are enforceable to all and in the countries that go there (Art 318-322 Mining Code of DRC). Reminder to the liars! :LOL:

 

Dave Evans

Regular
20/11/2023
Sam Posted




Screenshot_20231120_212755_Google.jpg
 

Dave Evans

Regular
22/11/2023
9cardomaha posted


Massive win at ICC has trickled into ICSID, where the ICSID tribunal has taken notice of the measures that have been handed down:

ICSID has noted the following in OP2 (procedural order 2):
  1. Suspend all work for PR 13359 and PR 15775 for entities other than Dathcom - so Manono lithium, Z and C can all fuck right off.
  2. DRC (all ministerial departments, government authorities) to be restricted from taking any actions on the above-mentioned permits.
These are provisional at the moment with a hearing set for December 11 to hear the case and make these enforceable - expecting a verdict before Christmas.
 

Dave Evans

Regular
22/11/2023
TITS Posted


We have all seen what Cominiere and Zijin have been doing as those imbeciles have been parading it all over X. They have been ordered not to aggravate the situation.

Rule 39 Provisional Measures (1) At any time after the institution of the proceeding, a party may request that provisional measures for the preservation of its rights be recommended by the Tribunal.

On November 6, 2023, the Claimants filed a request for interim measures pursuant to Article 39(1) of
the Arbitration Rules in order to obtain protection of their procedural rights, in particular their rights to
non-aggravation of the dispute between the Parties and the preservation of the right to an enforceable
arbitral award


Non-aggravation of the dispute you say, well this hearing only goes one way.

Bring on December 11th hearing - and the verdict for a Christmas present.

If the MMGA defeat tomorrow (hence failed promises by Chinese and MMGA crooks to DRC officials) doesn't wake up the DRC Government then the ICSID agreement will, where they order a halt to any work by any Zijin/Cominiere affiliated companies on the implicated assets will surely provide a HUGE wake up call.

It will be effectively frozen until arbitration results or an agreement outside of ICSID & ICC, which we ALL know (DRC included) is in DRC's best interests as ICSID they simply cannot afford.
 

Dave Evans

Regular
29/11/2023
9cardomaha posted

What's the back up if Locke decide it's not worth the risk ? Would Nigel then need to go to share holders ? Apart from progress behind the scenes share holders are not privy to , I'm trying to wrap my head around why anyone would loan $20 mil to a company in this situation . Essentially AVZ is paying Locke US$200K to decide whether Locke would like to loan AVZ $20mil, and they have until end of March 2024 to make a decision . I think the meat of the $20 mil announcement got lost in the headline . So my question is , what's AVZ's back up plan if they cannot raise the $$$$ ?
Click to expand...

I'd probably say Locke might have even been a backup plan.

Enforcement of injunctive breach is higher than 20mil already. This one is basically a slamdunk, you did read the second ruling where Cominiere was asked to pay the court fees and legal fees etc. Just waiting for the tribunal to come together and we can be on our way to getting that cash - late Jan. Also measures from ICSID have a penalty attached but they move a little slower, but still lightspeed for legal cases.

All these small things are pushing the needle in our favour for the dominoes to fall, ICC win, trickled into ICSID etc. When the dominoes come crashing down, the other parties will be paying DLA's fees as seen in the injunctive relief already obtained.

Note: these aren't the final verdicts which are for full damages and remedies, these are injunctive breaches which are payable basically as soon as a verdict is rendered, these move much faster and will all occur before March 2024.

To illustrate:
  • ICC Emergency injunction submitted April 18, Emergency ruling May 4.
  • ICC Emergency injunction 2 (post 15775) submitted October 30, emergency ruling Nov 15.
  • ICC tribunal already formed and waiting for submissions before Dec 15 - enforcement will come around January for breaches already incurred.
  • Emergency measures request ICSID Nov 7, Tribunal response Nov 20 with measures and timetables, sets Dec 11 hearing - verdict likely before Christmas.
MMGA's bullshit about LOCKE is just a scare tactic - and clearly has sown doubt so hopefully this helps people focus a little.

Don't go drinking the MMGA cool-aid...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Dave Evans

Regular
04/12/2023
9cardomaha posted

ZJ v AVZ - ICC


Claim: AVZ does not recognize Zijin as a shareholder in Dathcom (15% ROFR)

Sep 2023 - hearing on jurisdiction completed
Nov 2023 - submissions on jurisdiction
Feb 2024 - verdict on jurisdiction - likely to rule in our favour

Nov 2023 - emergency submission to throw the case out in light of 15775 and the return of shares in Dathcom.
Dec 2023 - ruling on emergency submission to throw the case out - pending, but unlikely


AVZ v Dathomir - ICC

Claim: 10% from Dathomir which has been illegally terminated

Oct 2023 - provisional measures requested by AVZ to remove Dathomir's request to dissolve DATHCOM JV (given it is no longer part of the JV)
Verdict pending, highly likely to rule in our favour, Jan 2024


AVZ v Dathomir - ICC

Claim: 5% from Dathomir which has been illegally terminated

DLA requested consolidation with the above case to address all 15% at once.
Verdict will likely come alongside the provisional measures, likely to consolidate.


AVZ v Cominiere - ICC

Claim: Cominiere illegally terminated JVA and breached contractual obligations (including ROFR)

May 2023 - Emergency injunction 1 granted, 50k euros daily penalty for any action cominiere takes with adverse effects to Dathcom
Nov 2023 - Emergency injunction 2 granted, additional 50K penalty which now includes 15775 and restricts cominiere from working on the tenement
Dec 2023 - Panel constituted and hearing on measures for enforcement.
Verdict likely to come mid Jan 2024 on the enforcement of Emergency Injunction, before going into other remedies and issues


Cominiere + ZJ v AVZ - ICC

Claim: AVZ triggered ministerial decree 00031, and detractors claiming damages of $1b

Sep 2023 - ICC refused ZJ's request to delay and consolidate case with ZJ v AVZ.
Dec 2023 - Tribunal to be constituted followed by submissions
Verdict won't come till late 2024 - pure fund drainer IMO


AVZ v DRC - ICSID

Claim: DRC breached mining code and unlawful termination of 13359

Oct 2023 - AVZ files emergency request to maintain status quo
Nov 2023 - ICSID takes note of ICC and issues provisional measures to be heard in Dec 2023
Dec 2023 - first virtual hearing 11th Dec
Verdict will come before Christmas to order complete stop of development at Manono by companies other than Dathcom.
 

Dave Evans

Regular
04/12/2023
9cardomaha posted

So Zijin are drilling the north, our Management seem to not be phased by this but it worries me greatly - they are purposely making themselves entrenched yet Nigel says no worries, assume that's just a front and do not trust his judgement given what he has said the last 2 years.

These guys care little for international laws its fkn mental
It's the way Fasken has been arguing the cases - ZJ is not part of the proceedings, so the Arbitrator does not have the authority to order their subsidiary to stop works. Cominiere sitting idle but ZJ continuing to drill is technically not in breach of the injunction etc.

But ZJ communicating with Cominiere and CKK the dumbfuck keeps posting 'their' magnificent work on X.... So let's get to enforcement of EA and then see who's laughing.

My comment on Fasken getting in on ICSID being not ideal for us still remains true, but i don't think ICSID will say it doesn't have jursidiction.... So bring on provisional measures from ICSID and then apply international legal pressure on ZJ not just Cominere.
 

Dave Evans

Regular
A few recent comments from Carlos about the ICC and Cominiere just to update this thread

15/01/2024


20240115_101108.jpg

20240115_101546.jpg

20240115_101055.jpg

20240115_101128.jpg

20230510_144120.jpg

20230510_144139.jpg

20230510_144159.jpg

20230510_144217.jpg

20230510_144236.jpg



17/01/2024

20240117_181859.jpg

20240117_182050.jpg


18/01/2024

Have reported Shane the fuckwit - Hey @Carlos Dangerwhere did you source those transcripts in regards to DLA calling out Cominere?

Any other juicy details?
It's from the ICC ruling in November. Link of translation below. Juiciest detail is when the ICC said that their prima facie reading of the Dathcom JVA indicates they clearly have jurisdiction and anyone that says they don't like Cominiere is a fucking idiot.

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5934d2ae6b8f5beeb5ba23f3/t/65577f9e3ceec52a0ea0145a/1700233132219/Affaire+CCI+27720+SP+(EA)-Ordonnance+CS+15-11-23+-+Eng+Translation.pdf
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

Dave Evans

Regular
25/01/2024
Carlos Posted


Here is the timeline of events in question for the 15% from Cominiere. I have the receipts in English and French to back all of these dates up.

2/10/19 – AVZ offers $15m USD for the 15% from Cominiere. This is before the DFS is completed which will establish market value of the project.

18/2/20 – The Minister of Portfolio (old one not green goblin) responds to AVZ and says sale can’t be approved until DFS is completed to establish market value. Encourages AVZ to ‘speed up work’ on the DFS. Tells AVZ that final price will be subject to a working session with AVZ.

21/4/20 – AVZ completes Dathcom’s DFS which establishes market value of the entire Manono project at $1,028m USD

21/7/21 – Cominiere writes to AVZ asking for our ‘opinion’ on them approving the sale of the 15% to Zijin. Also ask us for money as they broke. Crucially they do not mention the offer price. According to Cominiere this purportedly starts the 40 day time limit for enforcing FROR outlined in Article 9 of the Dathcom JVA.

4/8/21 – AVZ responds to Cominiere through Momentum Lawyers reminding them of our initial interest to purchase the 15% and their request for us to discuss the offer with the MoP. Notifies them of our desire to enforce the FROR. Reminds them of their commitment to cede 10% to the DRC government under the Dathcom JVA. Invites them to discuss the offer price with us as we have FROR and are still interested in buying the 15%. AVZ received no response to this letter from Cominiere.

30/8/21 – Cominiere’s purported 40 day time limit expires

20/9/21 – AVZ submits offer to purchase the 15% from Cominiere to the MoP at the market valuation of $154m USD established in the DFS

8/11/21 – AVZ writes a formal notice to Cominiere and Zijin saying they have been made aware that the purported sale of the 15% has been executed (I don’t know the exact date this occurred but it was sometime in September 2021 according to Zijin). Reminds them both of our FROR rights. Puts them both on notice to cease actions on this matter immediately.

9/5/22 – Zijin finally updates its shareholders and the market of its purported acquisition of the 15% of Dathcom from Cominiere at the below market value established in the DFS price of $33.4m USD. Weird silence from them for over 6 months there lol

11/5/22 – AVZ announces to the ASX that Zijin have initiated proceedings through the ICC to be recognised in Dathcom

30/11/22 – The IGF report is released to the public outlining the loss of revenue of $120.7m USD to the DRC people from the below market value of the purported sale of the 15% from Cominiere to Zijin. Says management of Cominiere and the MoP are responsible for the DRC people being rat fucked out of the $120.7m USD. Also says the $33m USD received by Cominiere was squandered and nothing has been allocated to the operation of Cominiere and they are broke because of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users
A few recent comments from Carlos about the ICC and Cominiere just to update this thread

15/01/2024


20240115_101108.jpg

20240115_101546.jpg

20240115_101055.jpg

20240115_101128.jpg

20230510_144120.jpg

20230510_144139.jpg

20230510_144159.jpg

20230510_144217.jpg

20230510_144236.jpg



17/01/2024

20240117_181859.jpg

20240117_182050.jpg


18/01/2024


It's from the ICC ruling in November. Link of translation below. Juiciest detail is when the ICC said that their prima facie reading of the Dathcom JVA indicates they clearly have jurisdiction and anyone that says they don't like Cominiere is a fucking idiot.

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5934d2ae6b8f5beeb5ba23f3/t/65577f9e3ceec52a0ea0145a/1700233132219/Affaire+CCI+27720+SP+(EA)-Ordonnance+CS+15-11-23+-+Eng+Translation.pdf
@Dave Evans, do you the the original french version of the most recent ICC ruling please?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Dave Evans

Regular
@Dave Evans, do you the the original french version of the most recent ICC ruling please?

Nice to hear from you Mr I.

@Carlos Danger is the man who seems to be able to access the original information in French. Send him a private message or have a look through his information.

I saved most of his information but it’s got so voluminous that it’s gotten hard to just go back through it searching for specific things.

I’ve done it all on my phone the last couple of months, where I used to do it my laptop and sort it into documents and folders to make it easy to find.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Top Bottom