BRN Discussion Ongoing

[smoothsailing18]

Rayz

Department of Energy (DOE) and Missile Defense Agency (MDA)-Funded AI-driven Cyberthreat management Platform Offers Zeek and Corelight Compatibility with Neuromorphic Edge Computing; Live Demonstrations at BrainChip Venetian Exhibit Suite 29-116, January 6-9; Available via Software Licensing or Managed Services

*Is Zeek/Corelight compatibility a big deal for BrainChip?​

Yes — it’s a very big deal.

Akida’s compatibility with Zeek and Corelight turns edge cybersecurity from a theoretical use case into a practical, deployable, near-term commercial opportunity, exactly in line with what the podcast framed as the most promising wedge.

What Zeek is — and why it’s foundational​

Zeek (formerly Bro) is one of the most widely deployed network security monitoring (NSM) platforms in the world.

It is open-source, mature (originating at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), and deeply embedded in serious security environments.

 

[schuey]

Good afternoon/evening or even morning,

With CES 2026 fast approaching, we have never been in a more (solid) position to continue engaging with our clients
and potentially new clients, as always, we will get to see some recorded interviews, product demos and with a little luck
some new announcements with regards new partners or maybe a loosening of the NDA hangman's noose.

Still a little early in my opinion, and happy to stick with a 12-month growth spurt between July 2026 and June 2027, just
a rusted-on long termer airing his thoughts.

Why is this event so important to any small company trying to change people's perceptions of the future, because it's
all about being given the opportunity to be heard and seen, to network, to expand on engagements that may have stalled
because of no roadmap, not enough support padding, a one trick pony scenario, lack of finance, clients just hellbent on not
changing or even the timing within their own organization just simply doesn't/didn't match up with our timelines.

So many variables that a shareholder would not even consider, why, because he/she/they are simply focused possibly on
making a quick buck, in where disruptive technology is concerned doesn't just roll off the tongue like that.

Sean has hinted and hinted something is about to happen, maybe a joint announcement as we head into CES 2026, but that's
just me, no fact involved, just Tech's opinion, it's a real journey into the unknown, isn't it.

Regards...Tech.

So now 2027.....keep changing the goal post hey.....

 

[Deleted member 3781]

So now 2027.....keep changing the goal post hey.....

No one knows, bro. We were all wrong with our predictions. It could be next week, next month, or never … we’re not prophets. All we can do is guess. Tech is changing fast: year to year, month to month. Programmers, engineers, and scientists are working hard every day. A breakthrough can come out of nowhere. The year just started, and we don’t have the power to change anything. We’re on the sidelines, watching the game … and we cheer when our team scores, stay positive and watch them now

 

[manny100]

Weebit has a license with Onsemi .

View attachment 93966

Trio platform for industrial and automotive applications .

View attachment 93969



Weebit has automotive qualification .

View attachment 93967

Brainchip and Weebit discussions on multiple fronts .

View attachment 93968

Despite claims over on the crapper by shorters you are actually 'on the ball'.
We do have a contract with Parsons for 'volume'.
See Parsons/Brainchip reference to contract pricing for large volume deployment.
"The supply framework includes committed volumes for manufacturing scale, continuity-of-supply provisions, and tiered pricing for high-volume deployment. "
Obviously volumes will not occur straight away but its clear volumes are the intention by both parties.
Looking forward to Raytheon , Bascom Hunter and Onsor following suit with contracts for volume commitments.

BrainChip & Parsons Partner to Boost Edge AI Defense

 

[FJ-215]

Podcast out

20 minutes in and this is hard going!!!!!

What is the point of interviewing a journalist????

FFS.....................

Jesus.....................Is it so hard to have a BRN podcast about BRN....... and with BRN customers.............talking about their products with BRN tech inside..........

 

[Bravo]

Good post Doz. He says there are discussions ( with Brainchip) but I can't go into that.
That says it all.
We can only guess how many 'discussions' Brainchip is having with other companies.
There would be a lot. Sean in his video interviews of late is not shy about talking up the number of engagements in progress.

Hi Manny,

I’m not convinced that Weebit is really “in like Flynn” with BrainChip.

In fact, in the podcast I linked below dated 27 October 2025, Weebit specifically touched on neuromorphic computing.

While Weebit was generally positive about neuromorphic computing's long-term potential, they clearly characterised it as still being largely in the research phase, suggesting it’s several years away from meaningful commercial adoption.

Mark Makenis agrees as well that neurmorphic computing is a few more years away from commercialization than near-memory compute (in other word's Weebit's offering).

For clarity, I’ve linked directly to the relevant video so people can hear it for themselves, rather than relying on my interpretation only.

At 8 mins, Erin Briman says something along the lines of "In a few years time the future is neuromorphic computing really mimicking the brain, but that is still in research and it's gonna take a few years from now too mature."

Why did he say it's in research still? If we are working so closely with Weebit wouldn't they know we're not at research phase, because anyone close would know we are commercial now?



This isn’t my opinion. It’s what was actually said. So please don't shoot the messenger down.

Separately, Weebit has also announced a collaboration with the NEMO Consortium, which appears to be targeting similar use cases and applications to those BrainChip is pursuing. According to the NEMO website, they are developing analog neuromorphic cores (as distinct from BrainChip’s digital approach), based on IP from Professor Shahar Kvatinsky at Technion.

Before anyone jumps down my throat, I’d encourage people to check the facts. I haven’t invented this. It's publicly available information. Whether people like it or not, this is simply what’s been stated by the parties involved.

I’ve said this before, I believe in the technology. But belief doesn’t mean switching off your critical thinking.

 

[jrp173]

So now 2027.....keep changing the goal post hey.....

yup Tech is full of it...

All his secret squirrel conversations with PDVM, all the innuendo, and now he's saying between July 2026 and June 2027... He is totally delusional....

He's from the school of thought, that even a broken clock is correct twice a day!

 

[Flenton]

yup Tech is full of it...

All his secret squirrel conversations with PDVM, all the innuendo, and now he's saying between July 2026 and June 2027... He is totally delusional....

He's from the school of thought, that even a broken clock is correct twice a day!

Not to mention his post 3 to 4 years ago saying something about an explosion of sales which supposedly came from PVDM.
There was once a time I really valued what he had to say.

 

[Diogenese]

Hi Manny,

I’m not convinced that Weebit is really “in like Flynn” with BrainChip.

In fact, in the podcast I linked below dated 27 October 2025, Weebit specifically touched on neuromorphic computing.

While Weebit was generally positive about neuromorphic computing's long-term potential, they clearly characterised it as still being largely in the research phase, suggesting it’s several years away from meaningful commercial adoption.

Mark Makenis agrees as well that neurmorphic computing is a few more years away from commercialization than near-memory compute (in other word's Weebit's offering).

For clarity, I’ve linked directly to the relevant video so people can hear it for themselves, rather than relying on my interpretation only.

At 8 mins, Erin Briman says something along the lines of "In a few years time the future is neuromorphic computing really mimicking the brain, but that is still in research and it's gonna take a few years from now too mature."

Why did he say it's in research still? If we are working so closely with Weebit wouldn't they know we're not at research phase, because anyone close would know we are commercial now?



This isn’t my opinion. It’s what was actually said. So please don't shoot the messenger down.

Separately, Weebit has also announced a collaboration with the NEMO Consortium, which appears to be targeting similar use cases and applications to those BrainChip is pursuing. According to the NEMO website, they are developing analog neuromorphic cores (as distinct from BrainChip’s digital approach), based on IP from Professor Shahar Kvatinsky at Technion.

Before anyone jumps down my throat, I’d encourage people to check the facts. I haven’t invented this. It's publicly available information. Whether people like it or not, this is simply what’s been stated by the parties involved.

I’ve said this before, I believe in the technology. But belief doesn’t mean switching off your critical thinking.

Hi Bravo,

I'm not sure about any synergies between BRN and Weebit.

The podcast with Coby Hanoch at 19 minutes differentiates between the use of ReRAM for memory, which is a thing now, and ongoing development of its future use for neuromorphic compute-in-memory (analog)

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/bu...g/news-story/7be732f46c8a8ca3cb9e7d5bb93e31b6

The fact that they can claim a licence with Texas instruments would seem to validate their technology for memory applications under 14 nm, which SRAM apparently cannot achieve.

Basically, the fundamental reproducibility problem with analog is yet to be overcome to enable its use in NNs. Memory is fine - just single bits storing information, but when calculations involving thousands of bits which may vary by, eg, 1%, the result can be unreliable. To some extent, NNs can tolerate some variability because they operate on probability, not mathematical precision, but it becomes problematic when the variability exceeds the allowable tolerance,

 

[Deleted member 3781]

Take care guys… bravo want your cheap shares !

 

[Deleted member 3781]

Did you watch the video?

Starting at the point that Weebit says what Weebit says about neuromorphic computing?

No I didn’t..Honestly, I don’t give a tired penny what anyone is saying right now. It’s all just a power struggle over market share. Some claim it’s still a long way off because they’ve got nothing to show themselves yet. Others say that soon every device will be equipped with neuromorphic tech, etc. Everyone’s trying to position themselves.

And even if it takes longer—I’m not selling a single share.

I still remember how I got torn apart here and on the other forum just because I called out a CEO from another company for implying—between the lines—that his product was better than Akida. So why should I care what other CEOs say now? Nope. I’ll just wait and see what happens. The year has barely started, if that.

 

[Space Cadet]

Probably been put up before. Apologies in advance.


https://arxiv.org/html/2507.15958v1

SC

 

[Space Cadet]

https://www.elprocus.com/ai-enabled-safe-locker-with-brainchip-project/

Maybe this has been up before. I've lost count.

SC

 

[manny100]

Hi Manny,

I’m not convinced that Weebit is really “in like Flynn” with BrainChip.

In fact, in the podcast I linked below dated 27 October 2025, Weebit specifically touched on neuromorphic computing.

While Weebit was generally positive about neuromorphic computing's long-term potential, they clearly characterised it as still being largely in the research phase, suggesting it’s several years away from meaningful commercial adoption.

Mark Makenis agrees as well that neurmorphic computing is a few more years away from commercialization than near-memory compute (in other word's Weebit's offering).

For clarity, I’ve linked directly to the relevant video so people can hear it for themselves, rather than relying on my interpretation only.

At 8 mins, Erin Briman says something along the lines of "In a few years time the future is neuromorphic computing really mimicking the brain, but that is still in research and it's gonna take a few years from now too mature."

Why did he say it's in research still? If we are working so closely with Weebit wouldn't they know we're not at research phase, because anyone close would know we are commercial now?



This isn’t my opinion. It’s what was actually said. So please don't shoot the messenger down.

Separately, Weebit has also announced a collaboration with the NEMO Consortium, which appears to be targeting similar use cases and applications to those BrainChip is pursuing. According to the NEMO website, they are developing analog neuromorphic cores (as distinct from BrainChip’s digital approach), based on IP from Professor Shahar Kvatinsky at Technion.

Before anyone jumps down my throat, I’d encourage people to check the facts. I haven’t invented this. It's publicly available information. Whether people like it or not, this is simply what’s been stated by the parties involved.

I’ve said this before, I believe in the technology. But belief doesn’t mean switching off your critical thinking.

Hi Bravo, Yes, what you say is true. It appears everyone in AI is talking to everyone. Even Sean says he can get a meeting with virtually anyone. Not every meeting/talks will lead to an engagement and then progress to a deal but sales is a 'probability game' and the more leads you chase the more business you eventually get.
You miss one you get another.
Weebit is talking/spoke (according to another vide posted) with Brainchip but it may or may not lead to anything.
There would be a lot of BRN talks and/or engagments in progress we do not know about.

 

[manny100]

yup Tech is full of it...

All his secret squirrel conversations with PDVM, all the innuendo, and now he's saying between July 2026 and June 2027... He is totally delusional....

He's from the school of thought, that even a broken clock is correct twice a day!

Name calling is straight from the shorters handbook.
Despite name calling appearing 'childish' its a technique used to put down posters who have a bullish outlook. Most posters by now see right through it.

 

[IloveLamp]

Apologies if posted already

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260102430038/en/MetaGuard-AI-Debuts-Defense-Grade-Cybersecurity-Platform-at-CES-2026-with-Industry-First-Full-Source-Code-Access-and-BrainChip-Neuromorphic-Support?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=linkedin&utm_source=socialnetwork

MetaGuard AI Debuts Defense-Grade Cybersecurity Platform at CES 2026 with Industry-First Full Source Code Access and BrainChip Neuromorphic Support | Aaron Goldberg

Pleased to be demonstrating the power of our IoT Network Intrusion Detection software on Brainchip’s Akida Edge Box at CES next week!

www.linkedin.com

 

[TECH]

So now 2027.....keep changing the goal post hey.....

2031 probably

 

[Jacob Kiraz]

Hi Bravo, Yes, what you say is true. It appears everyone in AI is talking to everyone. Even Sean says he can get a meeting with virtually anyone. Not every meeting/talks will lead to an engagement and then progress to a deal but sales is a 'probability game' and the more leads you chase the more business you eventually get.
You miss one you get another.
Weebit is talking/spoke (according to another vide posted) with Brainchip but it may or may not lead to anything.
There would be a lot of BRN talks and/or engagments in progress we do not know about.

Probably does talk to Peter hence why the 2025 call, obviously timelines change but a guy in the podcast said everything is A.I at the CES This year, look at WBT Signing deals, BrainChip will have its moments

 

[manny100]

Apologies if posted already

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260102430038/en/MetaGuard-AI-Debuts-Defense-Grade-Cybersecurity-Platform-at-CES-2026-with-Industry-First-Full-Source-Code-Access-and-BrainChip-Neuromorphic-Support?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=linkedin&utm_source=socialnetwork

MetaGuard AI Debuts Defense-Grade Cybersecurity Platform at CES 2026 with Industry-First Full Source Code Access and BrainChip Neuromorphic Support | Aaron Goldberg

Pleased to be demonstrating the power of our IoT Network Intrusion Detection software on Brainchip’s Akida Edge Box at CES next week!

www.linkedin.com

View attachment 94013

MetaGuard being commercially available now and Defence grade is further validation of our product and definitely will have a positive effect on our portfolio safety net value.
The CES26 demos are happening inside our own allocated space, which positions us as a 'big'player in neuromorphic cybersecurity.
Its also a signal that our commercial reach is growing.
Fortunately the cybersecurity market is growing rapidly and our defense wide connections will only add further credibility to our products.
The big advantage this new system has that most AI security are Blackbox systems (as are traditional AI Provenance systems) - that is a huge advantage for us. Once we get Provence software on the shelf Provenance will make it a must have.

 

[Space Cadet]

Little confusing. Nearly 2 years to go, yet we are ready to demo with frontgrade now?

We knew about Rapidity Space but ESA still evaluating GR801 until Nov 2027?

Hopefully more like evaluating what use cases it can be used for!

https://esaphilab.se/vaias-project/

SC