stockduck
Regular
Hypothesis: 
A new company needs financial resources to launch a groundbreaking new technology and cover the associated costs. Specialized financial institutions exist that have earned the trust of other established, solvent companies and can lend this capital.
These financial institutions operate within the framework of trade secrets and the legitimate business interests of their respective countries of origin.
Now, there are one or more solvent clients with substantial capital who wish to invest in the new company with its groundbreaking technology but prefer to remain anonymous, perhaps to protect the competitive advantages of their own products.
The transfer of funds from these solvent clients to the startup is facilitated by these specialized financial institutions, which communicate the initial investment price of the client's shares to the startup. A legitimate business is emerging, operating under these usual business practices, over which neither management nor small investors can exert any influence.
Only when the new technology achieves market penetration will everyone benefit from the paradigm shift.
Could such an explanation be conceivable regarding the frustrating obstacles that small investors have to overcome, and is this what Kostolany meant back then with his "10 years of loyalty"?
This is just a hypothesis, and I certainly don't know anything about these things out there in the financial market and industrial business.
I wish all long-term strategists (and myself) continued success in our investments.
(translated by google translator)
 A new company needs financial resources to launch a groundbreaking new technology and cover the associated costs. Specialized financial institutions exist that have earned the trust of other established, solvent companies and can lend this capital.
These financial institutions operate within the framework of trade secrets and the legitimate business interests of their respective countries of origin.
Now, there are one or more solvent clients with substantial capital who wish to invest in the new company with its groundbreaking technology but prefer to remain anonymous, perhaps to protect the competitive advantages of their own products.
The transfer of funds from these solvent clients to the startup is facilitated by these specialized financial institutions, which communicate the initial investment price of the client's shares to the startup. A legitimate business is emerging, operating under these usual business practices, over which neither management nor small investors can exert any influence.
Only when the new technology achieves market penetration will everyone benefit from the paradigm shift.
Could such an explanation be conceivable regarding the frustrating obstacles that small investors have to overcome, and is this what Kostolany meant back then with his "10 years of loyalty"?
This is just a hypothesis, and I certainly don't know anything about these things out there in the financial market and industrial business.
I wish all long-term strategists (and myself) continued success in our investments.
(translated by google translator)
 
				 
 
		

 what’s wrong with the Autors those days ?
 what’s wrong with the Autors those days ?  In June 2025, Sony Semiconductor Solutions invested in BrainChip Holdings to co-develop neuromorphic processors for vision-based AI in autonomous vehicles and consumer electronics. Trials are underway with Japanese automotive OEMs.”
 In June 2025, Sony Semiconductor Solutions invested in BrainChip Holdings to co-develop neuromorphic processors for vision-based AI in autonomous vehicles and consumer electronics. Trials are underway with Japanese automotive OEMs.” 
					
				 
 
		 
	 
 
		 
 
		