CrabmansFriend
Regular
I just finished listening to latest episode of the "Brains and Machines" Podcast. It's an interview with Professor Gordon Cheng of the Technical University of Munich in Germany about creating artificial skin for machines. The title of the episode is "Event-Driven E-Skins Protect Both Robots and Humans".
Once again, I found it a very interesting interview. But what particularly caught my attention was a statement at about 28:19 and 29:00 where Gordon Cheng talks about Intel Munich shutting down their neuromorphic efforts and a certain telephone company. I'm not sure if this telephone company is meant to be a part of Intel or if he's referring to another company.
Anybody has a guess which company he's talking about?
The relevant quote from the available transcript is:
Another section I found quite interesting was part of the discussion between Sunny Bains, Giulia D’Angelo and Ralph Etienne-Cummings about the interview afterwards:
Once again, I found it a very interesting interview. But what particularly caught my attention was a statement at about 28:19 and 29:00 where Gordon Cheng talks about Intel Munich shutting down their neuromorphic efforts and a certain telephone company. I'm not sure if this telephone company is meant to be a part of Intel or if he's referring to another company.
Anybody has a guess which company he's talking about?
The relevant quote from the available transcript is:
SB: Absolutely. And you wouldn’t like to tell me which companies these are that have dropped their neuromorphic efforts, would you?
GC: I think Intel closed the lab in Munich already, and the other big company is the, you know, the telephone company that they are.
Another section I found quite interesting was part of the discussion between Sunny Bains, Giulia D’Angelo and Ralph Etienne-Cummings about the interview afterwards:
GDA:
[...]
But anyway, one thing that I think is very important—he talks finally about the elephant in the room! He said that Intel already closed the neuromorphic lab, and many other companies are leaving us. And he’s mentioning the chicken-and-egg problem: people would use technology if it has a use case, but the technology hasn’t been created enough to satisfy the use case. What do you think about this specific point that he made?
REC: So I think timing is everything in the development of these types of technologies. Something that comes too early does not get turned into an actual application as quickly as something that comes at the right time. And you can see that all along the way, right? In fact, Intel itself, before the Loihi—back in the ’90s there was the ETANN chip, right? Which was, for all intents and purposes, an entire replication, if you will, of neural networks and implementation of backprop, and so on and so forth. That was done at that time, but that died as well. And then Loihi came back in the 2000s and survived a bit. And now we’re saying that it’s going away.
But, at the end of the day, we have a number of startups now that are looking at the application space. And you have companies that have well-developed—you look at PROPHESEE, right? Yes, they’re having a little bit of difficulty recently but, on the other hand, you had 120 people and they still have 70 people doing this stuff. And that’s in the vision space. And you have a company like BrainChip. I know that there’s a few other big neuromorphs—meaning people who’ve been doing neuromorphic engineering for a long time in our field—who are now running the technology part of that company.
SB: There’s got to be at least 30 or 40 people at BrainChip, because I was there last year—it’s quite a lot of people.
REC: Yeah. And they are putting out ideas and chips that are being developed very much with ideas of application right into it.