BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
Chocolate HobNobs.
Bravo
If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
Whilst I was in a state of semi-consciousness, I began to question life, death and the universe and then all of a sudden a little green man appeared out of no-where and asked me why it was that we were evidently at more risk of someone leaking information about redomiciling to Serbia, Turkmenistan or the Bungle Bungles, rather than leaking information about any of our NDA's. We had a chat about that for a little while.
Then I woke up and put a load of washing on.
Then I woke up and put a load of washing on.
Agree, it appears the $9 mill, 10 engagements with large multi nationals and another 20 or so with subsidiaries of those Fortune 500 companies has gone under the radar.Entertainment value highest ever
Board knew they were going into a vipers pit of rusted on holders
But seriously wtf were some of those questions. I felt embarrassed through my phone, can only imagine it in the place.
Antonio stressed at the start of the meeting that it was just an investigation (re-domiciling), i believe the latest quarterly also stated the same.
Suggestions that the company should be advertising on radio and TV in Australia is honestly laughable, the company is scrutinised quarterly on their spending - as if they are going to spend on advertising to the uneducated public. Just so some of the oldies in the crowd get a few extra cents on the share price lmfao
So much grandstanding, im this and im that and i think this - the reason the company hasn't implemented your suggestions is because its 0 VALUE GAIN
The same questions get asked year on year, and you keep getting the same answer, when are you folks going to learn honestly
Shareholders whining about performance of CEO - CEO ties himself to book more than double current annual revenue this year$9,000,000
Whoever asked the question about fortune 500 companies - nice, they actually added that there are 10 engagements with those large multinational, multibillion dollar companies + an additional 20 or so subsidiaries of those companies
Sean said there are several US government submissions happening monthly
Company has more engagements going in the last 5 months than in the entire history of the company
Can the grandstanding self absorbed old fuddy duddies go elsewhere with their REVENUE NOW demands, BHP should suit you nicely lmfao
God speed Antonio, Sean and board.
That should put a few offside - Go BRN
Also we have had more engagements in the past 5 months than in the entire prior history of the company combined.
Once holders settle down focus will return to those types of engagements plus the enormous potential of projected Tech advancements.
You still got some left? Don't care whatever you smoke or inhale
I definitely need something today
Pom down under
Top 20
No the was another member from here
Pom down under
Top 20
They must have been pre selected before they reached the meeting room as I’m sure they answered all the questions provided to the board
Tothemoon24
Top 20
Pom down under
Top 20
Adoption of renumeration report failed then passed I smell a
FJ-215
Regular
Technically a third strike but the counter reset after last year.
Counts as a first stike.
Pom down under
Top 20
How many resets can they get?
Last edited:
FJ-215
Regular
What are the chances of that exchange being edited out of any AGM video that gets posted?
Seriously though, looking back, Antonio did seem genuinely surprised at the mention of moving to the US. Almost as if what he signed off on at Board level was not what was announced on the ASX.
Sorry, conspiracy theory....ignore!!!
FJ-215
Regular
No idea. If the board keeps surviving the second strike I guess it is business as usual
HopalongPetrovski
I'm Spartacus!
I guess you choose to either believe them or not.
It's really down to each investors judgement.
For what its worth these are my impressions of todays AGM which I watched online.
Some people have previously determined viewpoints and that tends to colour what they see appropriately.
Vianna, as chair of the meeting, is required to conduct it in a safe and orderly manner.
In that role he has the authority to shut down discussion when it is spiralling out of control, which is exactly what he did when that bloke got out of hand, trying to instigate a yelling match, towards the end.
Beyond that, I saw him take questions as they were offered.
I thought he did, as usual, a good job.
His very early remarks addressed the redomicile "elephant in the room", and as I see it he gave a credible response.
As the BOD wanted to discuss the possibility's with a wider set of consultants than they are normally dealing with, and knowing the hysteria a "leak" of said information may cause, they provided us with a heads up. This is reasonable, in my opinion.
I think he got somewhat flustered and lost his way a bit with the denying of the destination as USA, and in that regard I think he was in error.
It was good to hear FF and our Irish buddy put the issues of ASX announcements to them forcefully, and though it got a "noted" or two, I doubt we will get much movement on that. Antonio did claim the credit for this stance and as the Chair, I guess it's ultimately his call.
Sean does not present to a group well, which is a handicap in his position, but he is better, in my experience, and much less clunky, one on one.
He is driving his vision and whilst he is no show pony, I do think he is a good work horse.
As to whether we are on a profitable track, that is yet to be determined.
So far, and share price wise, which is of overwhelming importance to us, it is not performing.
But we are seeing some take up and the previous Tech roadmap was somewhat encouraging.
It also highlighted the need for constant and continuing innovation, which is best guided by continuing consultation with our still developing eco system and potential future clientele.
I wish Liebeskind would have made his presentation to us earlier than right before his vote, when he was clearly behind the eight ball given votes already cast. I thought him credible and did wind up voting for him even though I could see he wasn't likely to be successful.
I did this as a kind of non detrimental protest vote to boost his figures and perhaps give the current board some pause for thought.
There is obviously much they are privy too, that they cannot disclose publicly at this time.
This will always be the situation with an emerging tech company such as BrainChip.
It is easy to tar them with the lifestyle co meme and be disgruntled with their remuneration packages.
If it's all a con, we've done our dough.
If they are real, and the God's smile on us, we are maybe onto a multi bag winner.
I guess you choose to either believe in them or not.
It's really down to each investors judgement.
For what its worth these are my impressions of todays AGM which I watched online.
Some people have previously determined viewpoints and that tends to colour what they see appropriately.
Vianna, as chair of the meeting, is required to conduct it in a safe and orderly manner.
In that role he has the authority to shut down discussion when it is spiralling out of control, which is exactly what he did when that bloke got out of hand, trying to instigate a yelling match, towards the end.
Beyond that, I saw him take questions as they were offered.
I thought he did, as usual, a good job.
His very early remarks addressed the redomicile "elephant in the room", and as I see it he gave a credible response.
As the BOD wanted to discuss the possibility's with a wider set of consultants than they are normally dealing with, and knowing the hysteria a "leak" of said information may cause, they provided us with a heads up. This is reasonable, in my opinion.
I think he got somewhat flustered and lost his way a bit with the denying of the destination as USA, and in that regard I think he was in error.
It was good to hear FF and our Irish buddy put the issues of ASX announcements to them forcefully, and though it got a "noted" or two, I doubt we will get much movement on that. Antonio did claim the credit for this stance and as the Chair, I guess it's ultimately his call.
Sean does not present to a group well, which is a handicap in his position, but he is better, in my experience, and much less clunky, one on one.
He is driving his vision and whilst he is no show pony, I do think he is a good work horse.
As to whether we are on a profitable track, that is yet to be determined.
So far, and share price wise, which is of overwhelming importance to us, it is not performing.
But we are seeing some take up and the previous Tech roadmap was somewhat encouraging.
It also highlighted the need for constant and continuing innovation, which is best guided by continuing consultation with our still developing eco system and potential future clientele.
I wish Liebeskind would have made his presentation to us earlier than right before his vote, when he was clearly behind the eight ball given votes already cast. I thought him credible and did wind up voting for him even though I could see he wasn't likely to be successful.
I did this as a kind of non detrimental protest vote to boost his figures and perhaps give the current board some pause for thought.
There is obviously much they are privy too, that they cannot disclose publicly at this time.
This will always be the situation with an emerging tech company such as BrainChip.
It is easy to tar them with the lifestyle co meme and be disgruntled with their remuneration packages.
If it's all a con, we've done our dough.
If they are real, and the God's smile on us, we are maybe onto a multi bag winner.
I guess you choose to either believe in them or not.
I attended the AGM the venue was very hostile that's what I felt. regarding re-domicile was mentioned and clarified but it kept coming so it became bit tense. And also the attack on Peter himself was sad to see and hear.
I am done with the forum to much personal attack and very negative.
on the last note i found the shape BRN. and pipe line its taking very positive.
Sayonara
Humble Genius
Regular
What US market makes move? Apparently that announcement was posted by hackers from the PRC!
Pom down under
Top 20
FiveBucks
Regular
We're burning $26 million a year. My business generates $9 million in 6 months. If we are aiming for a market cap of at least a few billion, we're going to have to do a lot better than 9 million
Similar threads
