BRN Discussion Ongoing

[Diogenese]

Opinions are like assholes.

You can wipe them and start again?

 

[Esq.111]

Good evening Chippers ,

Hope we are all having a pleasant break.

Pressently watching a illuminating documentry on CLOUD STORAGE facilities.

SBS VICELAND HD
Channel 31 ( South Australia )

IS THE CLOUD DAMAGING THE PLANET?

Watch Is the Cloud Damaging the Planet?

Richard Bilton investigates the environmental cost of people moving their lives online and onto the Cloud. While convenient, the Cloud depends on processing factories and vast data centres that use enormous amounts of power and water.

www.sbs.com.au

* Any Chipper who has been here for any length of time, would know our tech could seriously help clean up this problem.... what the f@c€ are titans of industry doing ?????.

Any hooowls whilst we wait , in the fast paced ? , world we have invested in .....

‘The Great Moose Migration’: Swedish Slow-TV Sensation Charms Millions

Swedish public TV broadcaster SVT annually livestreams moose migrating toward summer pastures. The 2025 stream started this week, and loyal viewers are celebrating.

www.forbes.com

Hope we all have a plesant break & thankyou to all who contribute , large or small , collectively we have a group of enquiring minds who help illuminate the truely vast reach of our tech.

Appreciated.

Regards,
Esq.

 

[Getupthere]

My thoughts right now Get are ones of concern.

For mine, the announcement that Brainchip was considering moving to a US listing was a genuine shock. I contacted the company about my concerns, which centred around the following premise…that unless there was at least one major revenue generating deal announced, that would increase the share price significantly, then it would be grossly premature to move to a US listing. I added that existing shareholders value would be destroyed if the company moved without at least one major revenue producing deal in the kit bag.

The response from the company shocked me even more than their original announcement to consider moving. I was told, that because of the ASX disclosure rules, a major deal may never happen. I was told that the entities Brainchip was dealing with might never do business with us whilst we were listed on the ASX, because they were not prepared to risk being forced to reveal financial details, and information about how they were going to use our IP.

This prompted my discussions with the ASX about their interpretation of their very own disclosure rules, particularly rule 3.1A. They told me very clearly, that if Brainchip and a customer wanted to maintain confidentiality about a deal they were contemplating, then the onus was on both parties to remain silent about it. As long as confidentiality remained, there was no requirement to disclose the deal…it could remain confidential under ASX disclosure rule 3.1A.

When I told the company this, I used both the unnecessary Ford ASX announcement back in May 2020, that most likely caused Ford to end their collaboration with us, and Mercedes self outing themselves with press releases in January 2022, which has caused complete silence from them about us ever since.

Love them or hate them…after my discussions with the ASX, I cannot believe that the company would consider a premature, highly damaging for existing shareholders move to a US listing, because of the ASX disclosure rules.

Call me a conspiracy theorist…but I believe there is another agenda .

So these are my thoughts right now Get.

Thank you for taking the time to response

I can understand why the company’s response would raise red flags, especially if the reasoning doesn’t fully align with what the ASX itself clarified. The potential move to a US listing without a clear, revenue-generating anchor deal in place would understandably concern any long-term shareholder.

Something tells me this is more of a distraction leading up to the agm.

The more shareholders ask questions about a move to the USA the less they ask about managements results over the past 12 months.

 

[jrp173]

I was happy to have Pia fill the roll when it became vacant.
I think it good general policy to balance out the board with some female energy.
They do hold up half the sky after all.

Dunno that Steve Liebeskind really qualifies as "new blood"?
I am surprised that he throws his hat in the ring for a position and doesn't follow up with a pitch as to why any of us should vote for him?
What does he bring to the table?
Why would putting him in that position be in any way beneficial to either me or the company?

Perhaps my phrase "new blood" was incorrect, however I believe that Steve is the shake up that our board/company need.

I believe Steve's corporate background makes him a good candidate for this role. I've spoken to him a few times in the past and like him. Also you may recall from previous AGM, where he stood up and questioned the issue of shares to Manny Hernandez.

We need Australian NEDs that understand the ASX, and are prepared to go out on limb to make sure that Australian (actually any) shareholders are considered when decisions are made (for example, we are an ASX listed company and most Australian shareholders would expect announcements via the ASX and not just via media channels).

Another example where we need a NEDs who can see things from an Australian perspective - the price sensitive announcement saying they were thinking about moving to the US... I mean seriously, a NED with real corporate experience would surely have warned BRN that their announcement would not be well received and would in-fact hurt the share price. Why announcement something you are just considering??

Why would you not wait until you had some runs on the table, and could provide real information about the move, rather than what BRN did. I mean did they seriously think that shareholders would even entertain the idea with the share price where it is and with no "instantly profitable" deals that they keep talking about at AGMS?? I mean what next, an ASX announcement saying we are thinking of speaking to apple? seriously!!!

Some many other things that we need from our NEDs.

In my opinion, the board needs someone to call them out on the BS that is currently going on....

 

[Esq.111]

I'll just leave this here ,

 

[HopalongPetrovski]

Perhaps my phrase "new blood" was incorrect, however I believe that Steve is the shake up that our board/company need.

I believe Steve's corporate background makes him a good candidate for this role. I've spoken to him a few times in the past and like him. Also you may recall from previous AGM, where he stood up and questioned the issue of shares to Manny Hernandez.

We need Australian NEDs that understand the ASX, and are prepared to go out on limb to make sure that Australian (actually any) shareholders are considered when decisions are made (for example, we are an ASX listed company and most Australian shareholders would expect announcements via the ASX and not just via media channels).

Another example where we need a NEDs who can see things from an Australian perspective - the price sensitive announcement saying they were thinking about moving to the US... I mean seriously, a NED with real corporate experience would surely have warned BRN that their announcement would not be well received and would in-fact hurt the share price. Why announcement something you are just considering??

Why would you not wait until you had some runs on the table, and could provide real information about the move, rather than what BRN did. I mean did they seriously think that shareholders would even entertain the idea with the share price where it is and with no "instantly profitable" deals that they keep talking about at AGMS?? I mean what next, an ASX announcement saying we are thinking of speaking to apple? seriously!!!

Some many other things that we need from our NEDs.

In my opinion, the board needs someone to call them out on the BS that is currently going on....

Fair response, but again, why are we only hearing about him from you?
Sorry, but that smacks of arrogance in my opinion.
As he is putting himself up for the position, I expect to hear from him.
Here, or even on the crapper are zero cost options for him to talk directly to multiple share holders.
Share holders whose vote he is soliciting.
I can only assume he either does not need my vote or simply does not care.
His continued silence will not get it.

 

[DK6161]

I think most agree that good management deserves good rewards.
The share price is poor for sure.
The future looks bright for sure
But the big concern is the company revenue
For me personally Sean should be addressing this issue with his shareholders not how much people need to be paid.
I believe this shows no or very little respect for us.
I feel like pulling out of this investment to be honest
I have 300+ k tied up in the company and feel like I am being spat on at present
Thanks Sean

Sean acting like he is a big CEO from silicon valley and demanding to get similar size pay.
We make $40,000 per year and our share price is twenty cents.

 

[jrp173]

Fair response, but again, why are we only hearing about him from you?
Sorry, but that smacks of arrogance in my opinion.
As he is putting himself up for the position, I expect to hear from him.
Here, or even on the crapper are zero cost options for him to talk directly to multiple share holders.
Share holders whose vote he is soliciting.
I can only assume he either does not need my vote or simply does not care.
His continued silence will not get it.

It's not just from me. I've read the notice of AGM where you can read more about him and his background. Definitely worthwhile.

I think thats a little unfair. It would not be professional in my opinion for him to jump on here or HC...also did we hear from Pia or Carrick before they came onboard?

I'm viewing it as an improvement based on the position where we are now, and I believe he can only be of benefit to the company.

 

[jrp173]

I'll just leave this here ,

Wow.... blown away by this....

Disgraceful...

 

[HopalongPetrovski]

I think thats a little unfair. It would not be professional in my opinion for him to jump on here or HC...also did we hear from Pia or Carrick before they came onboard?

I've read the notice of AGM where you can read more about him and his background. Definitely worthwhile.

I'm viewing it as an improvement based on the position where we are now, and I believe he can only be of benefit to the company.

Both Pia and Carrick were invited onto the board.
Liebeskind is attempting to promote himself into a position on it.
I'm not saying he is or isn't qualified or that he would or would not be beneficial.
Frankly I don't know.
That is my point.
Frankly I think it more than a little unfair of him to expect my vote on zero information regarding his intentions.

 

[TheUnfairAdvantage]

I'll just leave this here ,

Wholly Fluck. That’s a Flucking Insult to all hard working shareholders putting in their hard earned $. WTF. That’s a years wages for some. What a joke.

 

[White Horse]

Sean acting like he is a big CEO from silicon valley and demanding to get similar size pay.
We make $40,000 per year and our share price is twenty cents.

You seem to forget that he (Sean) did not employ himself, he was picked by our board and founders of the company.
He would have been offered a package by them, considered commensurate with the requirements of the position.
So who is really responsible. And who first termed the phrase "rapid commercialization".

We need to stop thinking like peanuts, and realize this is not an Australia centric company, it's trying to be an international company, and should not be run by a bunch of geriatric Aussies.

 

[jrp173]

Both Pia and Carrick were invited onto the board.
Liebeskind is attempting to promote himself into a position on it.
I'm not saying he is or isn't qualified or that he would or would not be beneficial.
Frankly I don't know.
That is my point.
Frankly I think it more than a little unfair of him to expect my vote on zero information regarding his intentions.

Fair point from you too. But my view is, if we don't vote for something new, nothing will change.

 

[White Horse]

Wholly Fluck. That’s a Flucking Insult to all hard working shareholders putting in their hard earned $. WTF. That’s a years wages for some. What a joke.

Perhaps you and the others complaining about the compensation of the Board and management, should sit back and consider what you wish for.
Same goes for those wishing to replace management.
The cost might be more than crippling.

 

[Galaxycar]

Could,nt be any funnier Brainchip Management have seen the votes coming in against PIA and have panicked. Have we ever heard from her before, fuck no. Should have got rid of her at last AGM. if you don’t like the remuneration management are getting,easy vote against the person approving them. Self interest is what we are seeing, begging for her job and the rest of managements shitful remuneration scheme. Get rid of her if you have,nt voted yet,now’s your chance to send a clear message to the rest of the board,they are next. Look over the last three days here, forum user ears are starting to see the light and actually seem to have had enough too. The sheep herd is breaking. Vote the independent director in can’t hurt we already have a full board doing fuck all might as well pay another one.

 

[SERA2g]

Hi N...
Peter chose Pia, he has a lot of respect and belief in her, she's not only very well connected in business circles, she was part of the Brainchip team in the early days in Perth.

What goes on behind closed doors is very unfair to criticise unless you're privy to the other side of the door listening and watching what individuals are actually doing, having Pia on the Board from an Australian point of view is critical, unless you know of another Australian female to replace her with...just saying mate.

Ease up a touch, the fact that you still hold really says it all..hope you're enjoying being a Dad.

Best regards....Chris

Loving being a dad mate and yes I still hold, have never sold a share and am as confident as ever.

I didn't say anything about Pia.

I said:

"they've finally heard the complaints around visibility of the non execs who get shares for what looks like fuck all"

You've literally agreed with my comment around visibility by saying we can't judge what goes on behind closed doors.

Now that the AGM is coming up, we FINALLY hear from Pia after 2 years of literally nothing.

Note I also said "get shares for _what looks like_ fuck all". Again, we have no visibility to determine whether their performance shares are deserved or not, which comes right back to your comment around not being able to judge what goes on behind closed doors.

All of the above is why I'm saying wheeling Pia out for a podcast a month out from the AGM seems desperate.

I don't know how you could possibly argue with this.

It's a bit like political campaigns and seeing the PM visit regional areas for the first time in 3 years, a month before the election. Lol.

 

[Galaxycar]

AH here it is, the worry about what you wish for, arguement rolls out every agm. Mate it can’t be any worse, shareprice down the drain no support on the market, Management hiding shit for what 6 years behind NDA,s then trying to the run and hide to a USA bourse so they don’t have to disclose anything at all. And it will be covered up under the In the interest of the USA DEFENCE, we will know less than we know now.
Shareholders and the market have zero confidence in the management of Brainchip. The current share price is manipulation prior to the AGM so the shorters can push it down the day after the AGM. rinse and repeat happens every year. Remember who sold the 50 million share to the shorters last time to get them out of their shorts and make them millions. Yep Brainchip management did, 50 million shares and they called them sophisticated investor's to try and fool shareholders.

 

[The Pope]

Hi all,
There have been a lot of concerns, whinging with some positivity by a few regulars on key items in the lead up to this years AGM. I have already voted for the upcoming AGM and will be attending again. The latest podcast on renumeration smells a little but they are probably hoping this takes away atleast a few questions at the AGM on NED’s remuneration etc

One item that has dropped of the radar in the past 12 to 18 months by BRN management via ASX, annual reports and podcasts is updates on the submitted BRN patents awaiting approval. I recall the number of patents waiting approval was in high 20’s and many of these appeared to be dated back to 2022. It would be great to get an update from our CEO via a podcast before AGM as it’s my understanding these patents are essential to protect BRN IP etc and future revenue.

Anyone else been wondering how the BRN patents approvals is going ?

 

[Getupthere]

AH here it is, the worry about what you wish for, arguement rolls out every agm. Mate it can’t be any worse, shareprice down the drain no support on the market, Management hiding shit for what 6 years behind NDA,s then trying to the run and hide to a USA bourse so they don’t have to disclose anything at all. And it will be covered up under the In the interest of the USA DEFENCE, we will know less than we know now.
Shareholders and the market have zero confidence in the management of Brainchip. The current share price is manipulation prior to the AGM so the shorters can push it down the day after the AGM. rinse and repeat happens every year. Remember who sold the 50 million share to the shorters last time to get them out of their shorts and make them millions. Yep Brainchip management did, 50 million shares and they called them sophisticated investor's to try and fool shareholders.

Absolutely agree with you. It’s the same tired playbook every year—AGM rolls around, and suddenly we’re supposed to be optimistic while the share price tanks and management ducks behind NDAs and vague promises. The attempted shift to a U.S. exchange feels like nothing more than distraction before the AGM

There’s no transparency, no accountability, and no trust left. And as you said, the so-called “sophisticated investors” somehow getting the magic number shares they need to exit last year. —what a joke.
That move was a lifeline for the shorters, not shareholders. It’s a rinse-and-repeat cycle that leaves retail holders holding the bag while insiders and institutions play their games.

The lack of confidence in Brainchip’s management is completely justified. It’s not about wishing for something worse—it’s already at rock bottom.

 

[TheUnfairAdvantage]

Perhaps you and the others complaining about the compensation of the Board and management, should sit back and consider what you wish for.
Same goes for those wishing to replace management.
The cost might be more than crippling.

Old white man. You have banged on in favour of every move of this board of directors. You are so blind with your grey boomer glasses. Common man. How much value have you and I lost with blind faith.

Tha argument here is not talent. It is about directors telling shareholders how much they are worth. They are telling us they are worthy of their mega $ package. Really. Have you considered what sitting in a board meeting once a month is worth? Hmmm. My thinking from your previous posts of your years gone by ( many years) is you are a little out of touch with reality and modern equity.