Maybe they are reluctant to be seen using IBM's trade mark/reputation for self-promotion, especially if there's something going on under the NDA covers.
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
HopalongPetrovski
I'm Spartacus!
Of course I'd like the share price to be sitting somewhere over $2 by now.
I'd be much more comfortable in my skin than I am with it being depressed down here at 13 cents.
Most of us here have put our money where our mouth's are and backed BrainChip in the expectation that we will be rewarded financially for both our provision of capital and/or our purchase at market, demonstrating our faith in both the product and the company's ability to sell it in the market place.
Though these last 4 years since the MB spike have been a long hard slog, technical progress, eco system development, much more validation from potential partners and technical journals and articles has shown the growing relevance of our particular type of tech in an ever evolving landscape.
We are getting contracts and seeing interest in niche's within the demanding and critical arenas of both space and defence.
We are seeing interest in wearables, medical devices, cyber security and general inferencing applications across a broad and growing spectrum at the edge, and, more recently, as an easily implemented, fast, reliable and cost effective filter, closer to the traditional heavy lifting data centres.
Whilst these are all welcome, from an investors point of view, not much of it has had a particularly positive impact on the fundamental indicator most dear to our hearts.
It's coming up on Sean's 5 year plan anniversary, I think around November this year (Is that right?), which has been both endorsed and backed by the BOD, and if he hasn't been able to show us reasonable commercial success or let us in on an amended version which makes sense to me, he and they will likely lose both my confidence and backing.
I know that is already the case for many of you.
But until that time, management retain my support because it seems stupid to me to be knocking something I want to succeed, and which, in doing so, will benefit me.
If and when I lose faith in a company here on the ASX I either sell and take the loss, hold until I can exit even or with profit and just shut up, particularly once I have left.
I don't start white anting it out of spite or some sick requirement for revenge.
Of course, I'm not interested in trying to manipulate other holders mind set's into acting contrary to their own benefit and entirely with mine in mind, such as we see exemplified over on the crapper.
The traders who praise whilst encouraging increase to maximise their margin at sale, and then disparage with torrents of Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt whilst trying to drive the price down for another entry.
Personally I find such behaviour distasteful.
Hopefully we get commercial traction soon with contracts and revenue.
GLTAgenuineHolders.
I'd be much more comfortable in my skin than I am with it being depressed down here at 13 cents.
Most of us here have put our money where our mouth's are and backed BrainChip in the expectation that we will be rewarded financially for both our provision of capital and/or our purchase at market, demonstrating our faith in both the product and the company's ability to sell it in the market place.
Though these last 4 years since the MB spike have been a long hard slog, technical progress, eco system development, much more validation from potential partners and technical journals and articles has shown the growing relevance of our particular type of tech in an ever evolving landscape.
We are getting contracts and seeing interest in niche's within the demanding and critical arenas of both space and defence.
We are seeing interest in wearables, medical devices, cyber security and general inferencing applications across a broad and growing spectrum at the edge, and, more recently, as an easily implemented, fast, reliable and cost effective filter, closer to the traditional heavy lifting data centres.
Whilst these are all welcome, from an investors point of view, not much of it has had a particularly positive impact on the fundamental indicator most dear to our hearts.
It's coming up on Sean's 5 year plan anniversary, I think around November this year (Is that right?), which has been both endorsed and backed by the BOD, and if he hasn't been able to show us reasonable commercial success or let us in on an amended version which makes sense to me, he and they will likely lose both my confidence and backing.
I know that is already the case for many of you.
But until that time, management retain my support because it seems stupid to me to be knocking something I want to succeed, and which, in doing so, will benefit me.
If and when I lose faith in a company here on the ASX I either sell and take the loss, hold until I can exit even or with profit and just shut up, particularly once I have left.
I don't start white anting it out of spite or some sick requirement for revenge.
Of course, I'm not interested in trying to manipulate other holders mind set's into acting contrary to their own benefit and entirely with mine in mind, such as we see exemplified over on the crapper.
The traders who praise whilst encouraging increase to maximise their margin at sale, and then disparage with torrents of Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt whilst trying to drive the price down for another entry.
Personally I find such behaviour distasteful.
Hopefully we get commercial traction soon with contracts and revenue.
GLTAgenuineHolders.
TheDrooben
Pretty Pretty Pretty Pretty Good
Larry is giving Sean until the AGM in May to deliver his $9M in "bookings". From watching and listening to Antonio at last year's AGM, and quite frankly no one has heard of him since, he comes across as an arrogant, brash, typical US executive flog who needs to go (NOTED!!!). As far as Sean goes, every investor needs to ask themselves what the SP (therefore the market) would do if he was voted against at the next AGM. At the moment Larry is thinking the SP would go up if this happened.
Larry bought more last week.......but yeah that's absolutey all I am willing to invest
Happy as Larry
As much as I don't like the slimy ell either (The CoB), changing the CEO will be a bad idea IMO.
He now knows the products, customers and other potential customers very well, how far they are in informal talks and so on.
I don't think if we had another CEO back then when he was appointed that it would have changed anything as to where we are now.
Remember, the CEO answer to the BoD and if they are not happy with him, they can boot him out.
However, saying: watch us now (The CEO) and nothing happens isn't doing himself any favours seen by shareholders, they are entitled to know the truth without any lipstick.
I don't think announcements on the ASX is lacking.
Just because a high ranking IBM person buys a M2 card from DigiKey don't justify one IMO.
Let's see, he still got a little time getting the 9 mill in bookings, or he is in for a stormy AGM!
Similar threads
