BRN Discussion Ongoing

7für7

Top 20
Lynch mob, even THE POM is scratching his head, May explain why the shorters are so confident if they know nothing will be announced until a certain date. But where is the 2 million where has it shown up in the financials, Where is the announcement of IP DEALS, But don’t worry the may have announced it on the back page under the sex ads of the Zimbabwean news🤣😂🤣😂

Fould we all fell now fir???

brian regan what GIF
 

7für7

Top 20
The 2 million was predicted by the megachips license according to that article

“He led BrainChip technical team in securing a multi-year license agreement for its Intellectual Property (IP) of Akida AI accelerator with MegaChips, a japanese based global fabless semiconductor company. The multi-year licensing valued in millions and a $2 million forecast expected in royalties”

 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Frangipani

Top 20
Of course, it is totally possible whoever remaining at Brainchip is smart enough to continue this line of work. But may be hard to tell until there is a concrete patent filing or publication in top AI conferences for TENNs, which we have yet to seen without Olivier or Rudy. So does TENNs even have a future at Brainchip, or would the company take another 5 years pivoting to a new product line? "Could be, who knows?" as eloquently remarked by Dr. Tony Lewis ..

Engineers are logging their work down for others in the company to see, so anyone with expertise in this field can carry on where they left, it's not like they have done a Nobel Prize worthy discovery, is it?
Those 2 guys are not gods, O made problems and got 5 cold toes in the ass. R wanted to work for N and left. And that's that, end of story!

O and R are not gods, but I doubt Brainchip can just easily hire "experts in the field" off the street either. Maybe try a deep research with ChatGPT to see whoever left really have the "expertise". And I'm talking about engineers who do actual work, not yappers

Well said, @bludybludblud.

And @Guzzi62 is doing them injustice, seemingly blind to their major contributions over the years. Anyone who disagrees with me on this, please take the time to read the following:

Take a look at the names of the five inventors of BrainChip’s award-winning Eye-Tracking TENNs model. Sadly, our company will no longer benefit from this creative quintet’s synergistic mix of talents for future TENNs models:



9C8260C1-7F77-422E-AEC2-2F032339386A.jpeg




Sébastian Crouzet and Rudy Pei have since both left our company.
Five weeks ago, Olivier Coenen shared on LinkedIn that he was fired.
It looks as if we are also about to lose Sasskia Brüers-Freyssinet, judging from the changes she made in her LinkedIn profile shortly after Olivier Coenen was let go - all of a sudden, she uploaded a profile photo and changed her status to “Open To Work”.
That would leave Douglas McLelland as the only remaining-with-BrainChip inventor of this SOTA-leading TENNs model.

Keep this in mind when rereading Olivier Coenen’s 6+month-old LinkedIn post that he titled “On the Importance of Talent and Expertise in Innovation”. While all the TENNs patents would highly likely have been assigned to the inventors’ employer, ie. BrainChip, our former Senior Research Scientist warned of the potential consequences when crucial staff are not retained:

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/olivierjmdcoenen_on-the-importance-of-talent-and-expertise-activity-7314016757499711489-gCAg?

“Patents, while valuable, are often meaningless without the continued involvement and expertise of the individuals who created them. True innovation is fundamentally driven by talent, knowledge and experience - not merely by patents alone. Investing in people is equally, if not more, important than investing in technology itself.”

Only time will tell whether or not he will be right with respect to TENNs.
One thing is indisputable, though: there would be no TENNs models today without Olivier Coenen and Rudy Pei.

While our company may possibly attract equally gifted talent to replace those that are no longer employed with us (whatever the reason), no one should blame us shareholders, the co-owners of this company, to be concerned about the exodus of some of those brilliant minds who were instrumental in getting the company to where it is today thanks to their talent, passion, perspiration and perseverance, in an environment where they were able to flourish - at the time.

The recent return of Nikunj Kotecha is wonderful news, but doesn’t alter my opinion that the departure of numerous valuable experts has been an unfortunate loss for our company.

And I find it highly disrespectful of you, @Guzzi62, to dismiss Rudy Pei and Olivier Coenen as “some uninteresting ex employees”, thereby virtually ignoring their immensely valuable contributions to our company over the years.

And I’m not only referring to TENNs here. Let’s also not forget the USD 1.8 million AFRL award (of which USD 800,000 are payable to our subcontractor Raytheon/RTX). As I mentioned at the time of his sacking, it seems Olivier Coenen was instrumental in securing this SBIR II award and also served as the project’s PI:


550FB7A4-C4FF-4DC3-AF7F-91362B1D6AF7.jpeg



I'd advise everyone to listen to what our CTO Tony Lewis said about his (now ex-) colleagues 18 months ago during his presentation at NICE 2024 (Neuro Inspired Computational Elements Conference):




From 0:05 min:

"So a lot of the work that I'm gonna talk about is work, where the foundation was really made by two of my co-authors here - Rudy and Olivier. They laid the foundation to [?] this work a couple of years ago, and this is in turn based on other work that's been going on for 40 or 50 years. But we finally figured out a way of putting it all together and doing some kind of interesting things."

From 20:04 min:

"This polynomial space is really intriguing. And it would never have come into my knowledge set if I hadn't collaborated with the two physicists who are on my team."



And please also take a minute to read what Anil Mankar and Kris Carlson commented under another of Olivier Coenen’s LinkedIn posts, which he published shortly before the one I quoted above:

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/olivierjmdcoenen_innovation-is-often-viewed-as-driven-solely-activity-7313242078317056004-H8oU?

IMG_3060.jpeg




“Some uninteresting ex employees”? Seriously?
That’s plain ridiculous!
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Well said, @bludybludblud.

And @Guzzi62 is doing them injustice, seemingly blind to their major contributions over the years. Anyone who disagrees with me on this, please take the time to read the following:

Take a look at the names of the five inventors of BrainChip’s award-winning Eye-Tracking TENNs model. Sadly, our company will no longer benefit from this creative quintet’s synergistic mix of talents for future TENNs models:



View attachment 92655



Sébastian Crouzet and Rudy Pei have since both left our company.
Five weeks ago, Olivier Coenen shared on LinkedIn that he was fired.
It looks as if we are also about to lose Sasskia Brüers-Freyssinet, judging from the changes she made in her LinkedIn profile shortly after Olivier Coenen was let go - all of a sudden, she uploaded a profile photo and changed her status to “Open To Work”.
That would leave Douglas McLelland as the only remaining-with-BrainChip inventor of this SOTA-leading TENNs model.

Keep this in mind when rereading Olivier Coenen’s 6+month-old LinkedIn post that he titled “On the Importance of Talent and Expertise in Innovation”. While all the TENNs patents would highly likely have been assigned to the inventors’ employer, ie. BrainChip, our former Senior Research Scientist warned of the potential consequences when crucial staff are not retained:

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/olivierjmdcoenen_on-the-importance-of-talent-and-expertise-activity-7314016757499711489-gCAg?

“Patents, while valuable, are often meaningless without the continued involvement and expertise of the individuals who created them. True innovation is fundamentally driven by talent, knowledge and experience - not merely by patents alone. Investing in people is equally, if not more, important than investing in technology itself.”

Only time will tell whether or not he will be right with respect to TENNs.
One thing is indisputable, though: there would be no TENNs models today without Olivier Coenen and Rudy Pei.

While our company may possibly attract equally gifted talent to replace those that are no longer employed with us (whatever the reason), no one should blame us shareholders, the co-owners of this company, to be concerned about the exodus of some of those brilliant minds who were instrumental in getting the company to where it is today thanks to their talent, passion, perspiration and perseverance, in an environment where they were able to flourish - at the time.

The recent return of Nikunj Kotecha is wonderful news, but doesn’t alter my opinion that the departure of numerous valuable experts has been an unfortunate loss for our company.

And I find it highly disrespectful of you, @Guzzi62, to dismiss Rudy Pei and Olivier Coenen as “some uninteresting ex employees”, thereby virtually ignoring their immensely valuable contributions to our company over the years.

And I’m not only referring to TENNs here. Let’s also not forget the USD 1.8 million AFRL award (of which USD 800,000 are payable to our subcontractor Raytheon/RTX). As I mentioned at the time of his sacking, it seems Olivier Coenen was instrumental in securing this SBIR II award and also served as the project’s PI:


View attachment 92656


I'd advise everyone to listen to what our CTO Tony Lewis said about his (now ex-) colleagues 18 months ago during his presentation at NICE 2024 (Neuro Inspired Computational Elements Conference):




From 0:05 min:

"So a lot of the work that I'm gonna talk about is work, where the foundation was really made by two of my co-authors here - Rudy and Olivier. They laid the foundation to [?] this work a couple of years ago, and this is in turn based on other work that's been going on for 40 or 50 years. But we finally figured out a way of putting it all together and doing some kind of interesting things."

From 20:04 min:

"This polynomial space is really intriguing. And it would never have come into my knowledge set if I hadn't collaborated with the two physicists who are on my team."



And please also take a minute to read what Anil Mankar and Kris Carlson commented under another of Olivier Coenen’s LinkedIn posts, which he published shortly before the one I quoted above:

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/olivierjmdcoenen_innovation-is-often-viewed-as-driven-solely-activity-7313242078317056004-H8oU?

View attachment 92654



“Some uninteresting ex employees”? Seriously?
That’s plain ridiculous!

Should I be concerned about the companies future
Do we have the ability and knowledge to get contracts with out tenns.
That’s why the rollout of the chips
We are deep in the shit by the sounds of it.
 
Top Bottom