BRN Discussion Ongoing

[Tezza]

Just an example...

For all the arguments and reasons that BrainChip throw out about why they can't make ASX announcements, they should take a leaf out of Droneshield's book. No naming of their customer..

I'd encourage every shareholder to read, to see how other ASX companies make ASX announcements without naming client names.

https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02961561-2A1604770&v=4a466cc3f899e00730cfbfcd5ab8940c41f474b6

View attachment 88096

Maybe send that ann to Antonio!

 

[manny100]

Nicely worded, maybe things will change moving forward, but at present my opinion is that they won't...but I'm always wrong

I agree with you. The ASX are not concerned at all about News releases in the US not being announced here so change is unlikely.
The ASX may prefer it this way as they may be concerned that an announcement for example concerning the Chelpis (and others) partnership might get investors over excited.
If the ASX disagreed with BRN concerning ANNs they would have been onto them a long time ago.

 

[manny100]

I can see a massive IP deal coming next week!
Honest!
Please believe me, I can see it!!


View attachment 88100

Off to spec savers next week with the rest of us.

 

[jrp173]

Maybe send that ann to Antonio!

Yes I plan to send several different posts to IR and BRN to show what other companies are doing.. although I feel it's a waste of time, as that's exactly what Lancaster Grove should be doing (eg advising BRN on how to make announcements that won't get them in strife!

 

[Diogenese]

DJI is the largest drone manufacturer in the World, so would be great to be involved, but seeing as they're Chinese, I don't think it's likely..


"Skydio is the leading U.S. drone manufacturer and world leader in autonomous flight technology"

Anduril, is probably a good bet for our tech, in "their" various land/sea/air military drone technologies, but seeing as they have a philosophy of being able to easily outsource the production of their products, I can see Skydio (not to be confused with a high Dio) as being a recipient of US government funds, to bolster "their" Enterprise..

As well as Skydio itself, looks like a perfect fit for our technology, seeing as they already claim to be "World leaders" in autonomous flight..

BrainChip, would have purposely used, a "generic" DJI drone, as using a Skydio one, would literally "spill the beans"..

View attachment 88099

And we wouldn't want any unnecessary excitement here, would we...



Edit... Of course Dallas's post, on chips to China, now possibly opens the door to DJI, but we would be well behind there, as we wouldn't have been able to entertain that prospect earlier..

Not keen on dealing with China anyway..

... but I didn't inhale!!!!

 

[Bennysmadness]

Hi @TECH ,

I'm afraid I agree with the general consensus - that the excuses from BrainChip’s Board are starting to wear thin. So thin, in fact, they’re practically invisible at this point.

If Weebit can issue non-price-sensitive announcements, why can’t BrainChip? The only logical explanation for me is that the Board fears these partnerships are too fragile to even support a basic market update.

It’s time for some serious reflection.

Has anyone here actually received a response from the new IR team? Because I haven’t seen a single person say they’ve heard anything.

Have we found ourselves in a situation where the new IR team is somehow even less communicative than the old one-person setup?

The time for excuses is over.

Let's not forget that we are the ones who’ve kept the faith. We’ve supported this company through its formative years, weathered the seemingly endless delays, and defended it when it mattered.

We’re not asking for miracles, just a basic level of respect and transparency.

Surely, a good-faith attempt at proper communication is not too much to expect.

After-all Antonio admitted at the AGM that the hesitancy to announce anything was due to his own overly-conservative approach and he gave assurances that something would be done to improve this In future.

You stated "Brainchip continues making forward strides". But how can we trust this is true if so little is being officially reported and communication with shareholders has become virtually nonexistent?

Drama Queen!!, like a chicken sit on it and wait. The company will grow and prosper without continual updates. It seems that a post like this shows a negative view to your investment decision. If you can't sleep at night it's time to sell

 

[IloveLamp]

Let's Learn Together 🙃 #Day114 | Chetan Shidling

Let's Learn Together 🙃 #Day114 . 🚗💡 Neuromorphic Computing: The Brain Behind the Wheel! 🧠⚙️ The automotive industry is evolving faster than ever, and the next big leap is already here—Neuromorphic Computing. Inspired by the human brain, this technology brings incredible benefits like real-time...

www.linkedin.com

 

[Bravo]

Recent article about neuromorphic computing in the automotive industry which mentions BrainChip.

Neuromorphic Computing In The Automotive: Driving The Future With Brain-Inspired Intelligence​

June 30, 2025 Chetan Shidling

Car insurance
Hello guys, welcome back to our blog. In this article, I will discuss neuromorphic computing in the automotive industry, neuromorphic computing is the future with brain-inspired intelligence, and its associated challenges.
Ask questions if you have any electrical, electronics, or computer science doubts. You can also catch me on Instagram – CS Electrical &

Neuromorphic Computing In The Automotive​

Nearby car dealerships
The automotive industry is in the midst of a technological revolution. From electric vehicles to autonomous systems, the demand for intelligent, responsive, and efficient computing platforms is growing. Amid this evolution, Neuromorphic Computing—a brain-inspired paradigm—is emerging as a game-changer.
Neuromorphic systems offer a way to bring real-time learning, ultra-low power consumption, and robust decision-making to vehicles. This article explores how neuromorphic computing is redefining the automotive landscape.
Nearby car dealerships

What is Neuromorphic Computing?​

Neuromorphic computing mimics the structure and functioning of the human brain using electronic circuits. Unlike conventional von Neumann architectures that separate memory and computation, neuromorphic systems integrate them, leading to higher efficiency and parallelism.
Key Characteristics:

• Spike-based processing (Spiking Neural Networks)
• Event-driven computation
• Low power consumption
• On-chip learning capabilities

These features make neuromorphic systems highly suitable for edge applications, like those found in modern vehicles.

Neuromorphic vs Traditional Computing​

Feature	Traditional Computing	Neuromorphic Computing
Architecture	Von Neumann	Brain-inspired (Non-Von Neumann)
Processing	Sequential	Parallel
Power Consumption	High	Ultra-low
Learning	Offline (Cloud-based)	On-chip, real-time
Efficiency	Limited for real-world dynamics	Optimized for dynamic environments

The Need for Neuromorphic Systems in Automotive​

Nearby car dealerships
Modern vehicles process data from cameras, LiDAR, radar, ultrasonic sensors, and ECUs. With growing reliance on ADAS and autonomous functions, traditional CPUs and GPUs struggle to meet latency, power, and cost constraints, especially at the edge.
Neuromorphic chips are purpose-built to handle:

• Massive parallel data streams
• Event-based sensor inputs
• Local learning and adaptation
• Real-time decision-making with minimal latency

Thus, neuromorphic computing is not just an upgrade—it’s a necessity for next-gen vehicles.

Core Applications in Automotive​

Nearby car dealerships

a. Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)
Neuromorphic chips can enhance:

• Lane detection
• Pedestrian recognition
• Traffic sign interpretation
• Emergency braking decisions

Because these tasks require ultra-fast image processing and pattern recognition under varying conditions, neuromorphic processors deliver both speed and robustness.
b. Autonomous Driving
Car insurance

Autonomous vehicles need to understand dynamic environments with human-like perception. Neuromorphic processors enable:

• Real-time learning from driving scenarios
• Improved decision-making under uncertainty
• Adaptability to new roads or weather conditions without cloud retraining
• Car insurance

c. In-Vehicle Monitoring Systems
Driver and occupant monitoring (e.g., drowsiness detection, facial recognition) benefits from neuromorphic capabilities like:

• Low-latency visual recognition
• Continuous, low-power surveillance
• Fast adaptation to different lighting or driver behaviors

d. Predictive Maintenance
Neuromorphic systems process vibration, sound, and thermal sensor data in real-time to:

• Detect anomalies
• Predict component failures
• Recommend maintenance without cloud-based analytics

e. Real-Time Sensor Fusion
Neuromorphic processors can fuse data from multiple sensors (camera, radar, IMU) in parallel, allowing:

• 3D scene reconstruction
• Obstacle tracking
• Environmental understanding—all with low energy use

Leading Companies & Projects​

neuromorphic computing
Intel – Loihi
Intel’s Loihi chip simulates 130,000 neurons and supports on-chip learning, ideal for automotive edge applications. Research projects have shown Loihi achieving >1000x energy efficiency compared to CPUs in real-time inference.
Nearby car dealerships

IBM – TrueNorth
IBM’s TrueNorth was one of the earliest large-scale neuromorphic platforms. While not automotive-focused initially, its architecture inspired further developments.

BrainChip – Akida
Akida is a neuromorphic processor specifically designed for edge AI. It has already been deployed for vehicle occupant monitoring and gesture recognition.

SynSense
This startup focuses on ultra-low-power neuromorphic vision sensors, making them highly suitable for automotive vision systems.
Nearby car dealerships

Mercedes-Benz & Bosch
In collaboration, these companies are exploring neuromorphic computing for real-time driver assistance and intelligent camera systems.

Integration with Other Emerging Technologies​

Neuromorphic computing does not operate in isolation. It works synergistically with:

• Edge AI: Enabling intelligence without constant cloud connectivity
• Event-based cameras (DVS): Complementing neuromorphic processing
• 5G and V2X: Facilitating rapid data exchange while neuromorphic chips handle real-time decision-making
• Software-Defined Vehicles (SDV): Allowing updates and reconfigurable neuromorphic modules

Challenges in Implementation​

Despite its promise, several hurdles remain:

• Lack of Standardization: No unified software stack or programming model for automotive neuromorphic systems
• Hardware Availability: Most chips are still in experimental or early-commercial stages
• Scalability: Scaling neuromorphic systems to entire vehicle platforms is non-trivial
• Integration Complexity: Blending neuromorphic chips with conventional ECUs and architectures
• Nearby car dealerships

Future Roadmap​

By 2030, neuromorphic computing is expected to:

• Become mainstream in the premium and autonomous vehicle segments
• Power entire sensor-fusion modules for L4 and L5 autonomy
• Replace conventional edge AI systems in resource-constrained ECUs
• Enable dynamic, personalized in-vehicle AI that learns and evolves with the user
• Facilitate sustainability by significantly reducing automotive compute power consumption
• Nearby car dealerships

Governments and automakers are investing heavily in AI research, and neuromorphic tech will be a key pillar in this transformation.

Conclusion​

Neuromorphic computing stands at the crossroads of neuroscience and automotive engineering. With its potential to revolutionize everything from ADAS to autonomous navigation and predictive maintenance, it’s poised to become a foundational technology for future vehicles.
Nearby car dealerships

As challenges are addressed through industry collaboration, standardization, and silicon advancements, neuromorphic systems will drive the next wave of automotive intelligence, making vehicles smarter, safer, and more energy-efficient.

Neuromorphic Computing In The Automotive: Driving The Future With Brain-Inspired Intelligence - CSEE

In this article, I will discuss neuromorphic computing in the automotive industry, neuromorphic computing is the future...

cselectricalandelectronics.com

 

[Diogenese]

Drama Queen!!, like a chicken sit on it and wait. The company will grow and prosper without continual updates. It seems that a post like this shows a negative view to your investment decision. If you can't sleep at night it's time to sell

Do you come here often?

If you were paying attention you would know that @Bravo is the most respected and supportive contributor on this thread.

ad hominem insults add nothing to the discussion.

Several contributors here are fully supportive of the tech, but have a few gripes about management, not the least of which being management's apparent reluctance to make ASX announcements.

My understanding is that the company has taken advice and undertaken consultation on the subject, and I'm not in a position to second guess their decision.

Would I like to see more announcements? Yes.

Would I like to see BRN penalized for perceived pumping? ...

Do I expect BRN to redomicile when conditions suit? Yes.

Would a few black marks on our ASX report card complicate our chances of redomiciling? ...

 

[7für7]

Drama Queen!!, like a chicken sit on it and wait. The company will grow and prosper without continual updates. It seems that a post like this shows a negative view to your investment decision. If you can't sleep at night it's time to sell

On your next post you will explain that you are already 10 year invested and aktive on TSE…

GET OUTTA HERE

 

[Bravo]

Just came across this company called Neurmorphica.

It's a European deep-tech company specializing in neuromorphic computing, cybersecurity, and advanced communication systems.

The website shows it has offices in Sofia, Bulgaria, and Turin, Italy, and it focuses on delivering energy-efficient, brain-inspired AI solutions for various sectors, including autonomous vehicles, industrial robotics, medical devices, and secure communication networks.

I've included a screen shot below of their products page which describes:

• NMS731 - a neuromorphic system-on-chip (SoC) platform using SNNs, designed for ultra-low power, edge-based inference.
• NMT194 - a flexible software-defined radio (SDR) solution optimized for IoT and field-deployable smart devices.

Can't find anything publicly that links them to us or any of our competitors, so it's unclear whether they have developed their own proprietary solutions.

 

[TECH]

"Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company."

One enormous problem with your comments, this is not a private company that belongs to Antonio, this is a publicly listed company, it belongs to ALL shareholders. He doesn't get to decide...

This is clearly your opinion only and not Antonio's, as we can all see from Sean and Antonio's comments at the AGM this year..

Firstly from Sean at the AGM..., As we look into 25, our focus is laser sharp on 4 critical objectives, Objective Three, improve our investor relations to give stakeholders clear, transparent and top tier communication that reflect our commitment to shareholder engagement.

And from Antonio at the AGM - If we do a deal with customer A, right, trust me, Brainchip has no problem at all, right, trying to get information out, whether it be to the ASX or to the general market that we did business with Customer A, we absolutely want to do that. It, it promotes our brand, it shows the market that more people are utilizing our technology. It makes shareholders happy.

We have a relationship with the ASX. We've talked to the ASX. We have made it clear to the ASX how we do business. Right. And we will absolutely, when something we deem is truly material to the shareholders, we will absolutely put it on ASX. We understand that obligation.

And it is an active discussion at the board in terms of how we can fulfill non price sensitive announcements. That message has been heard. Look, I'll fall on the sword, right? Given the history of the company, I have swung whoops, apologies, I have swung the pendulum the other way in terms of being conservative, right? I don't want to get the company into trouble. I'm being too conservative.

I'll take the heat. Please shoot all arrows at me. Not my fellow board members, not Sean, that is Antonio. I'm too conservative, right?

I'm gonna fix that. I will fix that.

---------------------------------------------

It's amazing that any shareholder would try and excuse or justify Antonio's (and the company's) behaviour that is hurting the company and the share price.

Nice post, and yes "Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company." that's 100% my opinion, which is what this forum is all about, opinions and facts.

This quote that you posted really sums it up in my opinion:

We have a relationship with the ASX. We've talked to the ASX. We have made it clear to the ASX how we do business. Right. And we will absolutely, when something we deem is truly material to the shareholders, we will absolutely put it on ASX. We understand that obligation.

"We deem is truly material"....and that appears to be the real stumbling block, our company just can't make up earnings figures, it's such an immature business model (the edge AI market) it would currently be, pure guesswork, that's how a one-eyed believer views
the situation.

I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not.

Anyway, I'll finish there.........cheers Tech.

 

[7für7]

Nice post, and yes "Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company." that's 100% my opinion, which is what this forum is all about, opinions and facts.

This quote that you posted really sums it up in my opinion:

We have a relationship with the ASX. We've talked to the ASX. We have made it clear to the ASX how we do business. Right. And we will absolutely, when something we deem is truly material to the shareholders, we will absolutely put it on ASX. We understand that obligation.

"We deem is truly material"....and that appears to be the real stumbling block, our company just can't make up earnings figures, it's such an immature business model (the edge AI market) it would currently be, pure guesswork, that's how a one-eyed believer views
the situation.

I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not.

Anyway, I'll finish there.........cheers Tech.

“I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not.”

There will always be people who jump in at the all-time high…and if it drops just 10 cents, the same conversations start again.
Same with short-term thinking… you’ll find that attitude everywhere.
In fact, it’s the same with Tesla, Mercedes, Amazon… there’s always someone complaining, no matter how good the fundamentals are.


But some people .. like me
even I am an Professor Emeritus of Emotional Stability & Certified HODL Philosopher
… just want to let off some steam sometimes.
We had expectations, and the price is simply what it is right now. It’s frustrating.

I think it’s important to distinguish:

Is the criticism just coming from human weakness, from someone who’s been waiting and just wants to finally be rewarded?
Or is it malicious, just trying to stir up negativity because they have nothing better to do?
Just my opinion.

 

[Rskiff]

Nice post, and yes "Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company." that's 100% my opinion, which is what this forum is all about, opinions and facts.

This quote that you posted really sums it up in my opinion:

We have a relationship with the ASX. We've talked to the ASX. We have made it clear to the ASX how we do business. Right. And we will absolutely, when something we deem is truly material to the shareholders, we will absolutely put it on ASX. We understand that obligation.

"We deem is truly material"....and that appears to be the real stumbling block, our company just can't make up earnings figures, it's such an immature business model (the edge AI market) it would currently be, pure guesswork, that's how a one-eyed believer views
the situation.

I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not.

Anyway, I'll finish there.........cheers Tech.

"I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not."

I think that if the share price was $1.50 again, then there would have been news issued in some form. imo

 

[7für7]

I asked ChatGPT to run a deep research analysis of Akida.

Nothing radically new for those who’ve been following closely, but the tone is different. Less “next week to the moon,” and more “this is the groundwork of something long-term.”

Summary:
A close look at the technical features and partnerships surrounding BrainChip’s Akida chip reveals a consistent and compelling picture: Akida is more than just an Edge-AI accelerator. Through patented architectural innovations—such as on-chip learning SNNs, STDP mechanisms, and Temporal Event-Based Neural Networks (TENN)—it offers capabilities that conventional AI chips currently do not. These technologies are attracting serious attention within academic and industrial research communities.

At the same time, BrainChip is strategically positioning itself through targeted collaborations across key future markets. From energy-constrained vehicles and space systems to military-grade sensing and smart industrial automation—Akida is being deployed where traditional AI hits limitations. Its neuromorphic design aims to bring brain-like efficiency and autonomy directly to the edge.

These strategic alliances—from Mercedes-Benz to NASA to Renesas—suggest that BrainChip is actively building the foundation to become a pioneering force in the next era of AI silicon: where intelligence is local, adaptive, and sustainable.

Sources:
All the above insights are drawn from primary technical sources, including peer-reviewed papers, patent filings, official press releases by BrainChip and its partners, and specialist electronics publications. These materials confirm the technical claims and strategic initiatives mentioned here.

 

[Bravo]

"I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not."

I think that if the share price was $1.50 again, then there would have been news issued in some form. imo

Hi @Rskiff, like you, some would argue, quite reasonably, that our current share price is not just an unfortunate anomaly. Rather, that the reason it's sitting nowhere near $1.50 is a direct byproduct of the company’s persistent lack of material announcements. And therein lies the core issue IMO.

In a market driven by clarity and forward-looking signals, prolonged silence from a company - especially one working on cutting-edge technology like ours, breeds uncertainty, which fosters hesitation among potential investors and angst among existing shareholders.

I genuinely believe our product is world-class, and some of our partnerships appear to be extremely promising. The potential here is enormous. But if that promise isn’t regularly and confidently reinforced through formal communication, the market tends to assume the worst - or at best, assumes nothing is happening at all.

Without regular validation through updates, even non-price-sensitive announcements - the story simply fades away, along with the share price.

Some may not agree with my view on this, and that’s perfectly fine. We’re all entitled to our opinions. Ideally, we should be mature enough to hear differing perspectives respectfully and with an open mind.

I note @jrp173's earlier post regarding the AGM, where Antonio reportedly said, “It is an active discussion at the board in terms of how we can fulfil non price sensitive announcements.”

And @Diogenese, whose contributions I always respect, mentioned earlier that “the company has taken advice and undertaken consultation on the subject.”

Hopefully these matters are being discussed in depth and that the right advice is being sought to bridge the communication gap, for the benefit of all shareholders.

 

[7für7]

Hi @Rskiff, like you, some would argue, quite reasonably, that our current share price is not just an unfortunate anomaly. Rather, that the reason it's sitting nowhere near $1.50 is it’s a direct byproduct of the company’s persistent lack of material announcements. And therein lies the core issue IMO.

In a market driven by clarity and forward-looking signals, prolonged silence from a company - especially one working on cutting-edge technology like ours, breeds uncertainty, which fosters hesitation among potential investors and angst among existing shareholders.

I genuinely believe our product is world-class, and some of our partnerships appear to be extremely promising. The potential here is enormous. But if that promise isn’t regularly and confidently reinforced through formal communication, the market tends to assume the worst - or at best, assumes nothing is happening at all.

Without regular validation through updates, even non-price-sensitive announcements - the story simply fades away, along with the share price.

Some may not agree with my view on this, and that’s perfectly fine. We’re all entitled to our opinions. Ideally, we should be mature enough to hear differing perspectives respectfully and with an open mind.

I note @jrp173's earlier post regarding the AGM, where Antonio reportedly said, “It is an active discussion at the board in terms of how we can fulfil non price sensitive announcements.”

And @Diogenese, whose contributions I always respect, mentioned earlier that “the company has taken advice and undertaken consultation on the subject.”

Hopefully these matters are being discussed in depth and that the right advice is being sought to bridge the communication gap, for the benefit of all shareholders.

 

[jrp173]

Nice post, and yes "Antonio has simply had enough of the ASX, their attitude, their nastiness towards our company." that's 100% my opinion, which is what this forum is all about, opinions and facts.

This quote that you posted really sums it up in my opinion:

We have a relationship with the ASX. We've talked to the ASX. We have made it clear to the ASX how we do business. Right. And we will absolutely, when something we deem is truly material to the shareholders, we will absolutely put it on ASX. We understand that obligation.

"We deem is truly material"....and that appears to be the real stumbling block, our company just can't make up earnings figures, it's such an immature business model (the edge AI market) it would currently be, pure guesswork, that's how a one-eyed believer views
the situation.

I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not.

Anyway, I'll finish there.........cheers Tech.

I'm sorry but the excuses from BrainChip as to why they don't make ASX announcements just doesn't cut it any more. Here's another example of a company who can make price sensitive announcements with caveats.

This is just an example, but if people do some digging you will find many other examples where other companies can and DO make ASX price sensitive and non price sensitive announcements without hiding behind the nonsense that we are fed by BrainChip.

Not that hard if you have the balls, and if BrainChip truly believe that all of these partnership and collaborations will actually lead to deals!

 

[Esq.111]

Hi @Rskiff, like you, some would argue, quite reasonably, that our current share price is not just an unfortunate anomaly. Rather, that the reason it's sitting nowhere near $1.50 is a direct byproduct of the company’s persistent lack of material announcements. And therein lies the core issue IMO.

In a market driven by clarity and forward-looking signals, prolonged silence from a company - especially one working on cutting-edge technology like ours, breeds uncertainty, which fosters hesitation among potential investors and angst among existing shareholders.

I genuinely believe our product is world-class, and some of our partnerships appear to be extremely promising. The potential here is enormous. But if that promise isn’t regularly and confidently reinforced through formal communication, the market tends to assume the worst - or at best, assumes nothing is happening at all.

Without regular validation through updates, even non-price-sensitive announcements - the story simply fades away, along with the share price.

Some may not agree with my view on this, and that’s perfectly fine. We’re all entitled to our opinions. Ideally, we should be mature enough to hear differing perspectives respectfully and with an open mind.

I note @jrp173's earlier post regarding the AGM, where Antonio reportedly said, “It is an active discussion at the board in terms of how we can fulfil non price sensitive announcements.”

And @Diogenese, whose contributions I always respect, mentioned earlier that “the company has taken advice and undertaken consultation on the subject.”

Hopefully these matters are being discussed in depth and that the right advice is being sought to bridge the communication gap, for the benefit of all shareholders.

Afternoon Bravo ,

110% Agreeance.

Regards,
Esq.

 

[Getupthere]

“I realize that many are getting rather pissed off with our company for a variety of reasons, I just wonder if the share price was hanging around the $1.50 mark and we still weren't receiving the level of communication or ASX announcements, price sensitive or not, would the attitude of a large number of shareholders still be the same?? I think not.”

There will always be people who jump in at the all-time high…and if it drops just 10 cents, the same conversations start again.
Same with short-term thinking… you’ll find that attitude everywhere.
In fact, it’s the same with Tesla, Mercedes, Amazon… there’s always someone complaining, no matter how good the fundamentals are.


But some people .. like me
even I am an Professor Emeritus of Emotional Stability & Certified HODL Philosopher
… just want to let off some steam sometimes.
We had expectations, and the price is simply what it is right now. It’s frustrating.

I think it’s important to distinguish:

Is the criticism just coming from human weakness, from someone who’s been waiting and just wants to finally be rewarded?
Or is it malicious, just trying to stir up negativity because they have nothing better to do?
Just my opinion.

I don’t think you understand. It’s not about the share price being at 20 cents or $1.50.
It’s about progress.
Akida 1 was released in 2020, and Akida 2 has been out for over two years. It’s time for Brn to either manage to deliver results or step aside.
In my opinion, if Sean and Antonio can’t get results by the end of the year, they can get their last lot of allocated shares and move on.