Pom down under
Top 20
Beat me to it Bravo!
Anduril to Acquire Klas to Build the Future of Tactical Compute and Communications
Transforming US & allied military capabilities with advanced technology.
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
Getupthere
Regular
Well we all got our answer today.
The Pope
Regular
Yes I know but Iâm not going into anymore what he said to me at last AGM before the AGM started.
Wouldnât have responded earlier but been reading through 10 plus pages of amusing stuff today on TSE
BTW, do we have to call you "Your Donaldness" now?
Frangipani
Top 20
Personally, I am not at all keen for BrainChip to partner with Anduril, due to Palmer Luckeyâs long-standing support for Trump, whom I despise.
I just wanted to share, though, that a former BrainChip employee, Thao Tran, has been working for Anduril since February.
Mind you, this reveal doesnât necessarily mean there has to be some sort of engagement between the two companies. Iâve been checking in on Thao Tranâs LinkedIn profile from time to time ever since I had noticed a green âOpen to Workâ circle around his profile pic. So I strongly doubt he was delegated by our company to work for Anduril behind an NDA (as Iâm sure some forum users are immediately gonna try to spin it).
More likely, Thao Tran - like a number of other employees at the BrainChip Laguna Hills office in recent months - decided it was time for a change. Of course we can only speculate about the individual reasons why they left our company, but if you ask me, somebody who is totally happy with their current job for a company that describes itself as âthe worldwide leader in edge AI on-chip processing and learningâ and/or the workplace environment wouldnât usually publicly announce on LinkedIn to be âOpen to Workâ. And the way I see it, weâve had plenty of LinkedIn comments by ex-BrainChip employees that hint at there being something amiss.
Anyway, three months ago, I noticed that the green circle around the profile pic had suddenly gone and that the BrainChip logo was greyed out, even though it still listed our company as Thao Tranâs current employer at the time (screenshot taken on 4 February):
A month later, I noticed Thao Tranâs LinkedIn profile said he was now working as a Test Engineer for a âA Defense Companyâ (screenshot taken 5 March):
And when I checked back just now, I saw that the new employer has meanwhile been revealed to be Anduril.
www.linkedin.com
I just wanted to share, though, that a former BrainChip employee, Thao Tran, has been working for Anduril since February.
Mind you, this reveal doesnât necessarily mean there has to be some sort of engagement between the two companies. Iâve been checking in on Thao Tranâs LinkedIn profile from time to time ever since I had noticed a green âOpen to Workâ circle around his profile pic. So I strongly doubt he was delegated by our company to work for Anduril behind an NDA (as Iâm sure some forum users are immediately gonna try to spin it).
More likely, Thao Tran - like a number of other employees at the BrainChip Laguna Hills office in recent months - decided it was time for a change. Of course we can only speculate about the individual reasons why they left our company, but if you ask me, somebody who is totally happy with their current job for a company that describes itself as âthe worldwide leader in edge AI on-chip processing and learningâ and/or the workplace environment wouldnât usually publicly announce on LinkedIn to be âOpen to Workâ. And the way I see it, weâve had plenty of LinkedIn comments by ex-BrainChip employees that hint at there being something amiss.
Anyway, three months ago, I noticed that the green circle around the profile pic had suddenly gone and that the BrainChip logo was greyed out, even though it still listed our company as Thao Tranâs current employer at the time (screenshot taken on 4 February):
A month later, I noticed Thao Tranâs LinkedIn profile said he was now working as a Test Engineer for a âA Defense Companyâ (screenshot taken 5 March):
And when I checked back just now, I saw that the new employer has meanwhile been revealed to be Anduril.
THAO TRAN - Anduril Industries | LinkedIn
Experience: Anduril Industries ¡ Education: DeVry Institute of Technology ¡ Location: Westminster ¡ 75 connections on LinkedIn. View THAO TRANâs profile on LinkedIn, a professional community of 1 billion members.
Last edited:
Frangipani
Top 20
Be careful what you wish for:
âEven amid a rightward turn for the tech industry, Anduril stands out for its MAGA-alignment and closeness to the Trump administration of its top executives and investors.â
theintercept.com
Sam Biddle
May 1 2025, 4:30 p.m.
Share
The logo of Anduril Industries, the American defense technology company, at a conference in Australia on March 25, 2025. Photo: Alexander Bogatyrev/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images
TRUMPâS NOMINEE FOR under secretary of the Army, Michael Obadal, retired from a career in the Army in 2023, then spent the past two years working for Anduril, the ascendant arms maker with billions of dollars in Army contracts.
If confirmed to the Pentagon post â often described as the âchief operating officerâ position at the largest branch of the U.S. military â Obadal plans to keep his stock in Anduril, according to an ethics disclosure reviewed by The Intercept.
âThis is unheard of for a presidential appointee in the Defense Department to retain a financial interest in a defense contractor,â said Richard Painter, the top White House ethics lawyer during the George W. Bush administration. Painter said that while the arrangement may not be illegal, it certainly creates the appearance of a conflict of interest. Under the norms of prior administrations, Painter said, ânobody at upper echelons of the Pentagon would be getting anywhere near contracts if heâs sitting on a pile of defense contractor stock.â
Obadal has been a senior director at Anduril since 2023, according to his LinkedIn profile, following a nearly 30-year career in the U.S. Army. While the revolving door between the Pentagon and defense industry is as old as both of those institutions, federal law and ethical norms require employees of the executive branch to unload financial interests and relationships that might create a conflict of interest in the course of their duties.
Obadalâs April 11 financial disclosure letter, filed with the Office of Government Ethics, states âUpon confirmation, I will resign from my position as Senior Director at Anduril Industriesâ and forfeit his right to unvested stock options. But crucially, Obadal says he will retain his restricted stock units that have already vested â i.e., Anduril stock he already owns. That means he will continue to own a piece of the company, whose valuation has reportedly increased from $8.5 billion when Obadal joined to $28 billion today on the strength of its military contracts, and stands to materially benefit from anything that helps Anduril.
In his ethics letter, Obadal says he âwill not participate personally and substantially in any particular matter that to my knowledge has a direct and predictable effect on the financial interests of Anduril Industriesâ â unless heâs given permission by his boss, the secretary of the Army.
Don Fox, former acting director of the Office of Government Ethics, told The Intercept Obadalâs Anduril shares could pose a clear conflict of interest if he is confirmed. âThe general reason an appointee would be allowed to maintain a potentially conflicting interest is because divestiture is either not possible or highly impractical.â Anduril is privately held, meaning shares in the company canât be quickly disposed of on the stock market.
But Painter, the Bush-era ethics lawyer, suggests that Obadal could liquidate his stake in Anduril through the lively secondary market in its shares. âIn the Bush years, weâd just say âYouâre not going to the Pentagon,â said Painter.
Fox said that if Obadal adheres to whatâs in his ethics agreement and recuses himself from anything that touches Anduril, he will stay in compliance with federal law. âThatâs going to be a pretty broad recusal,â added Painter, who speculated, âHeâs going to have to recuse from any weapons systems that might use [Anduril] equipment, anything having to do with contracts, even competitor companies.â
Fox, who spent decades as a lawyer at the Air Force and Navy, speculated that a vast recusal from budgetary matters âis feasible, but heâs going to have to be really scrupulous about it,â to the point of literally leaving the room whenever Anduril, its capabilities, or those of its competitors are discussed. âOnce we get into areas that involve hardware and software, Iâd say donât even be in the room,â he said. âAt a really senior level, people are not only looking for what you say but what you donât say,â Fox added. âIt poses a significant risk to him personally of crossing that line, no matter how scrupulous he may be.â
William Hartung, a senior research fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft who focuses on the U.S. arms industry, describes the situation as âthe very definition of a conflict of interestâ given the vast business interests between Obadalâs current and new employer. âThe fact that the administration and the Congress have accepted this arrangement is a commentary on the sad state of ethics in Washington â an indication that too many of our elected officials wonât even try to take steps to make it harder to engage in corrupt practices,â Hartung added.
AS ITS SECOND-HIGHEST ranking civilian at the Army, Obadal will have considerable sway over what weapons the Army purchases, what technologies it prioritizes, and when and how the U.S. wages war. Having a former employee and current shareholder in that position may prove lucrative for Anduril as the company seeks to add to its billions of dollars of federal contracts.
In the past year alone, during Obadalâs time at the company, Anduril announced it was taking over the Armyâs Integrated Visual Augmentation System, a troubled $22 billion program intended to provide soldiers with augmented reality goggles and selling the Army components for its rocket artillery systems and a fleet of miniature âGhost-Xâ helicopter drones. Anduril is also working on the Armyâs TITAN system, a truck-mounted sensor suite, and an experimental U.S. Armyâs Robotic Combat Vehicle program.
Last year, DefenseOne reported that the Armyâs âunfunded prioritiesâ tech wishlist included â$4.5 million in research and development for Andurilâs Roadrunner-M drone interceptor.â Obadal described that jet-powered bomb drone in a LinkedIn post as ârevolutionary.â
The White House declined to comment on the ethics agreement and referred The Intercept to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, which also declined to comment and referred The Intercept to the Army, which referred The Intercept back to the White House. Neither Anduril nor Obadal responded to a request for comment.
Even amid a rightward turn for the tech industry, Anduril stands out for its MAGA-alignment and closeness to the Trump administration of its top executives and investors.
In December, the New York Times reported Trumpâs transition team offices were âcrawling with executives from defense tech firms with close ties to Mr. Trumpâs orbit,â including Anduril. The month before, Anduril co-founder and longtime Trump booster Palmer Luckey told Bloomberg he was already âin touchâ with the incoming administration about impending nominees: âI donât want to throw any (names) out there because I would be happy with all of them.â
âEven amid a rightward turn for the tech industry, Anduril stands out for its MAGA-alignment and closeness to the Trump administration of its top executives and investors.â
Trump's Pick for a Top Army Job Works at a Weapons Company â And Won't Give Up His Stock
Mike Obadalâs plan to keep his stock in Anduril if nominated as under secretary of the Army is a blatant conflict of interest, experts say.
theintercept.com
TRUMPâS PICK FOR A TOP ARMY JOB WORKS AT A WEAPONS COMPANY â AND WONâT GIVE UP HIS STOCK
Mike Obadalâs plan to keep his stock in Anduril if nominated as under secretary of the Army is a blatant conflict of interest, experts say.Sam Biddle
May 1 2025, 4:30 p.m.
Share
The logo of Anduril Industries, the American defense technology company, at a conference in Australia on March 25, 2025. Photo: Alexander Bogatyrev/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images
TRUMPâS NOMINEE FOR under secretary of the Army, Michael Obadal, retired from a career in the Army in 2023, then spent the past two years working for Anduril, the ascendant arms maker with billions of dollars in Army contracts.
If confirmed to the Pentagon post â often described as the âchief operating officerâ position at the largest branch of the U.S. military â Obadal plans to keep his stock in Anduril, according to an ethics disclosure reviewed by The Intercept.
âThis is unheard of for a presidential appointee in the Defense Department to retain a financial interest in a defense contractor,â said Richard Painter, the top White House ethics lawyer during the George W. Bush administration. Painter said that while the arrangement may not be illegal, it certainly creates the appearance of a conflict of interest. Under the norms of prior administrations, Painter said, ânobody at upper echelons of the Pentagon would be getting anywhere near contracts if heâs sitting on a pile of defense contractor stock.â
Obadal has been a senior director at Anduril since 2023, according to his LinkedIn profile, following a nearly 30-year career in the U.S. Army. While the revolving door between the Pentagon and defense industry is as old as both of those institutions, federal law and ethical norms require employees of the executive branch to unload financial interests and relationships that might create a conflict of interest in the course of their duties.
Obadalâs April 11 financial disclosure letter, filed with the Office of Government Ethics, states âUpon confirmation, I will resign from my position as Senior Director at Anduril Industriesâ and forfeit his right to unvested stock options. But crucially, Obadal says he will retain his restricted stock units that have already vested â i.e., Anduril stock he already owns. That means he will continue to own a piece of the company, whose valuation has reportedly increased from $8.5 billion when Obadal joined to $28 billion today on the strength of its military contracts, and stands to materially benefit from anything that helps Anduril.
In his ethics letter, Obadal says he âwill not participate personally and substantially in any particular matter that to my knowledge has a direct and predictable effect on the financial interests of Anduril Industriesâ â unless heâs given permission by his boss, the secretary of the Army.
Don Fox, former acting director of the Office of Government Ethics, told The Intercept Obadalâs Anduril shares could pose a clear conflict of interest if he is confirmed. âThe general reason an appointee would be allowed to maintain a potentially conflicting interest is because divestiture is either not possible or highly impractical.â Anduril is privately held, meaning shares in the company canât be quickly disposed of on the stock market.
But Painter, the Bush-era ethics lawyer, suggests that Obadal could liquidate his stake in Anduril through the lively secondary market in its shares. âIn the Bush years, weâd just say âYouâre not going to the Pentagon,â said Painter.
Fox said that if Obadal adheres to whatâs in his ethics agreement and recuses himself from anything that touches Anduril, he will stay in compliance with federal law. âThatâs going to be a pretty broad recusal,â added Painter, who speculated, âHeâs going to have to recuse from any weapons systems that might use [Anduril] equipment, anything having to do with contracts, even competitor companies.â
Fox, who spent decades as a lawyer at the Air Force and Navy, speculated that a vast recusal from budgetary matters âis feasible, but heâs going to have to be really scrupulous about it,â to the point of literally leaving the room whenever Anduril, its capabilities, or those of its competitors are discussed. âOnce we get into areas that involve hardware and software, Iâd say donât even be in the room,â he said. âAt a really senior level, people are not only looking for what you say but what you donât say,â Fox added. âIt poses a significant risk to him personally of crossing that line, no matter how scrupulous he may be.â
William Hartung, a senior research fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft who focuses on the U.S. arms industry, describes the situation as âthe very definition of a conflict of interestâ given the vast business interests between Obadalâs current and new employer. âThe fact that the administration and the Congress have accepted this arrangement is a commentary on the sad state of ethics in Washington â an indication that too many of our elected officials wonât even try to take steps to make it harder to engage in corrupt practices,â Hartung added.
AS ITS SECOND-HIGHEST ranking civilian at the Army, Obadal will have considerable sway over what weapons the Army purchases, what technologies it prioritizes, and when and how the U.S. wages war. Having a former employee and current shareholder in that position may prove lucrative for Anduril as the company seeks to add to its billions of dollars of federal contracts.
In the past year alone, during Obadalâs time at the company, Anduril announced it was taking over the Armyâs Integrated Visual Augmentation System, a troubled $22 billion program intended to provide soldiers with augmented reality goggles and selling the Army components for its rocket artillery systems and a fleet of miniature âGhost-Xâ helicopter drones. Anduril is also working on the Armyâs TITAN system, a truck-mounted sensor suite, and an experimental U.S. Armyâs Robotic Combat Vehicle program.
Last year, DefenseOne reported that the Armyâs âunfunded prioritiesâ tech wishlist included â$4.5 million in research and development for Andurilâs Roadrunner-M drone interceptor.â Obadal described that jet-powered bomb drone in a LinkedIn post as ârevolutionary.â
The White House declined to comment on the ethics agreement and referred The Intercept to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, which also declined to comment and referred The Intercept to the Army, which referred The Intercept back to the White House. Neither Anduril nor Obadal responded to a request for comment.
Even amid a rightward turn for the tech industry, Anduril stands out for its MAGA-alignment and closeness to the Trump administration of its top executives and investors.
In December, the New York Times reported Trumpâs transition team offices were âcrawling with executives from defense tech firms with close ties to Mr. Trumpâs orbit,â including Anduril. The month before, Anduril co-founder and longtime Trump booster Palmer Luckey told Bloomberg he was already âin touchâ with the incoming administration about impending nominees: âI donât want to throw any (names) out there because I would be happy with all of them.â
Frangipani
Top 20
Havenât come across any concrete links, but here is an observation that may be of interest:
A couple of months ago, I noticed that Steve Harbour had left Southwest Research Institute aka SwRI (which has been closely collaborating with Intel on neuromorphic research for years) to become Director of AI Hardware Research at Parallax Advanced Research, a non-profit research institute headquartered in Dayton, OH that describes its purpose as âSolving critical challenges for the Nation's security and prosperity.â
He has since liked a few LinkedIn posts by BrainChip, if I remember correctly (sorry, donât have the time right now to search for them).
This may not mean anything (especially given he seems to be quite a prolific liker in general), but who knowsâŚ
Definitely good to know that he is aware of our company and its technology.
View attachment 72606
View attachment 72607
View attachment 72605
Home | Parallax Research
We are a 501(c)(3) nonprofit research institute. We solve critical challenges for the Nation's security and prosperity. We do this by focusing on creating impact by accelerating investments in the U.S. science and technology enterprise.parallaxresearch.org
View attachment 72608
In this 29 April article about the Future of Neuromorphic AI in Electronic Warfare, Steven Harbour not only confirms a partnership between Parallax Advanced Research and Intel (no surprise here, as he already used to collaborate with them closely for years while at SwRI), but also one between Parallax Advanced Research and BrainChip:
Parallax Advanced Research and the Future of Neuromorphic Artificial Intelligence in Electronic Warfare
Published on
Apr 29, 2025
The convergence of artificial intelligence and defense technologies is poised to redefine the future of electronic warfare (EW). This shift, driven by third-generation AI techniques like spiking neural networks (SNN) and neuromorphic research, represents a critical step forward in equipping the U.S. military with innovative and adaptable solutions. We spoke with Dr. Steven Harbour, Parallax Advanced Research director of AI Hardware Research and a leading expert in neuromorphic research, to explore how his team is advancing AI capabilities and addressing emerging challenges in defense.
Parallax Advanced Research and Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) EW Team; left to right: Mr. Justin S. Tieman, Principal Engineer, SwRI; Mr. Keith G. Dufford, Senior Program Manager, SwRI; Mr. David A. Brown, Institute Engineer; and Director AI Hardware Research and Neuromorphic Center of Excellence, Parallax; Dr. Steven D. Harbour
Exploring AIâs Next Frontier
Traditional AI excels in tasks it has been trained on, demonstrating precision in recognizing familiar patterns and processing expected queries. However, Harbour highlights a significant limitation: AI's brittleness when confronted with the unexpected.
Humans, on the other hand, adapt to the unknown through cognitive problem-solving, a capability that AI systems must emulate to address future challenges effectively.
SNNs, inspired by the human brainâs functionality, offer a promising solution. Unlike traditional feedforward neural networks rooted in inferential statistics, SNNs excel in rapid decision-making under uncertainty, making them particularly suited for dynamic environments like electronic warfare.
Scaling Neuromorphic Systems
Parallax is at the forefront of advancing third-generation AI algorithms, partnering with Intel and Brainchip to develop scalable neuromorphic hardware.In terms of deployment, neuromorphic processors can be integrated into existing electronic countermeasure (ECM) pods, widely used in both Air Force and Navy operations. These pods, which are part of strike packages including crewed and uncrewed aircraft, offer a clear pathway for fielding these advanced systems across the Department of Defense (DoD).
The Role of Partnerships in Shaping AI Research
Collaboration plays a pivotal role in advancing neuromorphic research. Parallax, headquartered in Dayton, Ohio, benefits from proximity to leading institutions like the University of Dayton and the University of Cincinnati. Harbourâs connections with researchers like Professors Dr. Tarek Taha, Dr. Chris Yakopcic, and Dr. Vijayan K. Asari University of Dayton and Dr. Kelly Cohen an Endowed Chair and Lab Director at the University of Cincinnati have led to innovative projects, including combining âfuzzyâ logic with Neuromorphic SNNs to enhance AI decision-making.Parallaxâs independent research efforts are further bolstered by partnerships with institutions like Intel and Brainchip, ensuring access to cutting-edge neuromorphic technologies. These collaborations not only drive technological innovation but also foster a thriving research ecosystem essential for addressing the unique challenges of EW.
Evolving Applications in Defense Technologies
Over the next few years, an AFLCMC initiative will focus on developing and deploying third-generation AI algorithms on neuromorphic platforms. According to Harbour, the initiative aims to create âfieldable systems that can operate effectively in air, sea, land, and space environments.â This vision extends to supporting broader DoD efforts, including AFRLâs test facilities and ongoing collaboration with Southwest Research Institute.The adaptability of these systems will be critical for countering emerging threats. Harbour envisions a future where AI-powered EW solutions can address the unknown, enhancing situation awareness and enabling rapid response in high-stakes scenarios.
AI and the Future of EW
As neuromorphic research progresses, its impact on EW solutions for the U.S. military is undeniable. From enhancing strike packages to integrating AI into naval, land, and space operations, the potential applications are vast. Harbour emphasizes the importance of continued innovation and collaboration:Through its pioneering work in AI and defense technologies, Parallax is shaping a future where adaptability and innovation are the cornerstones of national security. By bridging the gap between academic research and practical deployment, the team is ensuring that the U.S. military remains at the cutting edge of electronic warfare capabilities.
###
About Parallax Advanced Research & The Ohio Aerospace Institute (OAI)
Parallax is a 501(c)(3) private nonprofit research institute that tackles global challenges through strategic partnerships with government, industry, and academia. It accelerates innovation, addresses critical global issues, and develops groundbreaking ideas with its partners. With offices in Ohio and Virginia, Parallax aims to deliver new solutions and speed them to market. In 2023, Parallax and OAI formed a collaborative affiliation to drive innovation and technological advancements in Ohio and for the nation. OAI plays a pivotal role in advancing the aerospace industry in Ohio and the nation by fostering collaborations between universities, aerospace industries, and government organizations, and managing aerospace research, education, and workforce development projects.
SERA2g
Founding Member
Incorrect.
I asked the question about whether the $9m is net of costs or gross revenue. My question couldn't have been more clear but I am an accountant and Antonio is not.
I expected him to direct the question to Ken but he chose not too which then resulted in the question having to be repeated so he could understand.
He gave the example that if they had sales of $2m and had direct costs of $1.9m then it would count as $100k in bookings.
This is what we as shareholders want because bookings being gross revenue means $9m in revenue is all that is required and it's therefore lot easier for Sean to get his RSU's and means lower revenue outcome.
If it's based on net then revenue will need to be higher than $9m, and depending on gross margins, could need to be several million higher. In the case of the AFRL contract, it was $1.8m revenue and $800k in subcontractor costs, meaning a gross profit of $1m and gross profit margin of 44.44%
If every deal was based on the same margin they'd need $16.2m in bookings to meet $9m in gross profit and therefore the bookings target.
The only thing I would note is that I would assume most of our deals will probably just have a contract sale amount that is both the gross and net amount. AFRL contract is as far as I'm aware the first one where we had the on cost of a subcontractor to help deliver the project, so it would be misleading to say we need $16.2m to get the $9m, but you get the picture.
Last thing I'd want to happen is they win a $9m contract, pay Sean his RSU's and then we have to fork out (using 44.44% margin) $4m in subcontractor fees. I would be livid if the true value of the deal was only $5m to Brainchip yet Sean's targets were considered met.
Good question on the currency, I didn't think to ask that but would assume USD. If I remember tomorrow I will ask Ken.
Last edited:
Frangipani
Top 20
In this 29 April article about the Future of Neuromorphic AI in Electronic Warfare, Steven Harbour not only confirms a partnership between Parallax Advanced Research and Intel (no surprise here, as he already used to collaborate with them closely for years while at SwRI), but also one between Parallax Advanced Research and BrainChip:
Parallax Advanced Research and the Future of Neuromorphic Artificial Intelligence in Electronic Warfare
Published on
Apr 29, 2025
The convergence of artificial intelligence and defense technologies is poised to redefine the future of electronic warfare (EW). This shift, driven by third-generation AI techniques like spiking neural networks (SNN) and neuromorphic research, represents a critical step forward in equipping the U.S. military with innovative and adaptable solutions. We spoke with Dr. Steven Harbour, Parallax Advanced Research director of AI Hardware Research and a leading expert in neuromorphic research, to explore how his team is advancing AI capabilities and addressing emerging challenges in defense.
Parallax Advanced Research and Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) EW Team; left to right: Mr. Justin S. Tieman, Principal Engineer, SwRI; Mr. Keith G. Dufford, Senior Program Manager, SwRI; Mr. David A. Brown, Institute Engineer; and Director AI Hardware Research and Neuromorphic Center of Excellence, Parallax; Dr. Steven D. Harbour
Exploring AIâs Next Frontier
Traditional AI excels in tasks it has been trained on, demonstrating precision in recognizing familiar patterns and processing expected queries. However, Harbour highlights a significant limitation: AI's brittleness when confronted with the unexpected.
Humans, on the other hand, adapt to the unknown through cognitive problem-solving, a capability that AI systems must emulate to address future challenges effectively.
SNNs, inspired by the human brainâs functionality, offer a promising solution. Unlike traditional feedforward neural networks rooted in inferential statistics, SNNs excel in rapid decision-making under uncertainty, making them particularly suited for dynamic environments like electronic warfare.
Scaling Neuromorphic Systems
Parallax is at the forefront of advancing third-generation AI algorithms, partnering with Intel and Brainchip to develop scalable neuromorphic hardware.
In terms of deployment, neuromorphic processors can be integrated into existing electronic countermeasure (ECM) pods, widely used in both Air Force and Navy operations. These pods, which are part of strike packages including crewed and uncrewed aircraft, offer a clear pathway for fielding these advanced systems across the Department of Defense (DoD).
The Role of Partnerships in Shaping AI Research
Collaboration plays a pivotal role in advancing neuromorphic research. Parallax, headquartered in Dayton, Ohio, benefits from proximity to leading institutions like the University of Dayton and the University of Cincinnati. Harbourâs connections with researchers like Professors Dr. Tarek Taha, Dr. Chris Yakopcic, and Dr. Vijayan K. Asari University of Dayton and Dr. Kelly Cohen an Endowed Chair and Lab Director at the University of Cincinnati have led to innovative projects, including combining âfuzzyâ logic with Neuromorphic SNNs to enhance AI decision-making.
Parallaxâs independent research efforts are further bolstered by partnerships with institutions like Intel and Brainchip, ensuring access to cutting-edge neuromorphic technologies. These collaborations not only drive technological innovation but also foster a thriving research ecosystem essential for addressing the unique challenges of EW.
Evolving Applications in Defense Technologies
Over the next few years, an AFLCMC initiative will focus on developing and deploying third-generation AI algorithms on neuromorphic platforms. According to Harbour, the initiative aims to create âfieldable systems that can operate effectively in air, sea, land, and space environments.â This vision extends to supporting broader DoD efforts, including AFRLâs test facilities and ongoing collaboration with Southwest Research Institute.
The adaptability of these systems will be critical for countering emerging threats. Harbour envisions a future where AI-powered EW solutions can address the unknown, enhancing situation awareness and enabling rapid response in high-stakes scenarios.
AI and the Future of EW
As neuromorphic research progresses, its impact on EW solutions for the U.S. military is undeniable. From enhancing strike packages to integrating AI into naval, land, and space operations, the potential applications are vast. Harbour emphasizes the importance of continued innovation and collaboration:
Through its pioneering work in AI and defense technologies, Parallax is shaping a future where adaptability and innovation are the cornerstones of national security. By bridging the gap between academic research and practical deployment, the team is ensuring that the U.S. military remains at the cutting edge of electronic warfare capabilities.
###
About Parallax Advanced Research & The Ohio Aerospace Institute (OAI)
Parallax is a 501(c)(3) private nonprofit research institute that tackles global challenges through strategic partnerships with government, industry, and academia. It accelerates innovation, addresses critical global issues, and develops groundbreaking ideas with its partners. With offices in Ohio and Virginia, Parallax aims to deliver new solutions and speed them to market. In 2023, Parallax and OAI formed a collaborative affiliation to drive innovation and technological advancements in Ohio and for the nation. OAI plays a pivotal role in advancing the aerospace industry in Ohio and the nation by fostering collaborations between universities, aerospace industries, and government organizations, and managing aerospace research, education, and workforce development projects.
Given the above confirmation by Steve Harbour that he and his neuromorphic team from Parallax Advanved Research have been exploring both Loihi and Akida, there is a good chance we might get a mention at the Space Enterprise Consortiumâs Virtual Pitch Day today, where they will presenting âNeuromorphic Event-Driven IR Perception for Low Latency Missile Warning and Typing (NEDIR-MWT)â:
Parallax Advanced Research is Pitching at Space Enterprise Consortium (SpEC) OTR Innovator NETWORX | Parallax Advanced Research
Parallax Advanced Research is Pitching at Space Enterprise Consortium (SpEC) OTR Innovator NETWORX Weâre proud to announce that our neuromorphic team, led by Dr. Dr. Steve Harbour, PhD , will be presenting our groundbreaking research: Neuromorphic Event-Driven IR Perception for Low-Latency...
The talk is part of the Virtual Pitch Day: AI/ML Applications to Enhance OPIR Data Processing.
I looked up OPIR:
âOverhead Persistent Infrared (OPIR) refers to a technology that utilizes infrared sensors mounted on satellites or airborne platforms to provide continuous surveillance and monitoring of the Earth's surface.â
All the usual defence giant suspects are already working on Next-Gen OPIRâŚ
Space Force hails progress in missile-warning satellite program
Space Force hails progress in missile-warning satellite program
spacenews.com
Space Force grants Northrop Grumman $1.8B to build missile warning birds for polar orbit - Breaking Defense
The two Northrop Grumman satellites, which will take highly elliptical orbits over the Earth's poles, are expected to be launched in 2028.
breakingdefense.com
On the Parallex Advanced Research website, there is also the following article published on 2 May about a ~USD 4 million DARPA contract awarded in mid-2023. It does not mention the use of neuromorphic technology as such, but refers to future versions of the functional prototype:
âThe Parallax effort is focused on creating trustworthy AI systems that can make complex, real-time decisions in high-stakes situationsâ where existing AI systems may make unethical decisions or fail to decide.
Parallax worked in close collaboration with Drexel University and Knexus Research Corporation to advance human-aligned decision-making in medical triage and mass casualty care environments.â
(âŚ) Future versions of the TAD system are expected to dramatically improve emergency medical decision-makingâoffering essential support in both military and civilian contexts. It could change how care is delivered when time, resources, and clarity are limited.â
Drexel University is of course also partnered with us - see the endorsement of BrainChipâs technology by Drexel Universityâs Anup Das that can be found on https://brainchip.com/akida-generations/:
Knexus AI - Live - Knexus AI
knexus.ai
ABOUT US
Knexus delivers AI solutions beyond-state-of-the-art.
For nearly two decades, Knexus has worked with dozens of agencies across the US Government as a trusted partner to deliver tailored solutions to mission-critical problems. With clients spanning 10+ years, the results speak for themselves as they continually return and rely on Knexus for innovative, practical solutions tailored to their problem sets.
In-the-Moment (ITM) Milestone: A New Era in Human-AI Interaction
parallaxresearch.org
In-the-Moment (ITM) Milestone: A New Era in Human-AI Interaction
Published on
May 2, 2025
From Input to Understanding
Artificial intelligence systems are typically designed to respond to specific commands. The Trustworthy Algorithmic Delegate (TAD) project, led by Parallax Advanced Research, takes this further by developing systems that align to user priorities like mission and quality of life, based on their responses to example situations. The goal is to enable AI to make autonomous decisions that align to human priorities, even when ethics and tradeoffs are unclear, and experts disagree. This is intended to increase the trustworthiness of AI decisions across a range of applications.
On July 6, 2023, Parallax Advanced Research was awarded a $4.067 million contract from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) for the In the Moment (ITM) initiative. The Parallax effort is focused on creating trustworthy AI systems that can make complex, real-time decisions in high-stakes situationsâ where existing AI systems may make unethical decisions or fail to decide.
Parallax worked in close collaboration with Drexel University and Knexus Research Corporation to advance human-aligned decision-making in medical triage and mass casualty care environments.
After months of foundational development, the TAD team has reached a significant technical milestone: transitioning from exploratory research to functional prototypes. This shift signals a pivotal momentânot only for the team, but for the future of natural human-AI collaboration.
The TAD system leverages breakthroughs in natural language processing, symbolic reasoning, and explainable case-based reasoning to create agents capable of recognizing and applying human priorities. Unlike conventional AI models that rely on statistical regularities to generate middle-of-the-road responses, TAD analyzes the context and meaning of a unique situation in terms of human viewpoints and considers what a human decision-maker would likely prioritize.
At the core of this achievement is a modular framework that translates ambiguous language into structured meaning representations. These are then grounded in real-world tasks using an expanding set of inference engines and domain-specific interpreters.
From Concept to Capability
Over the last quarter, the ITM team successfully demonstrated TAD capabilities in human-subject experiments, meeting or exceeding all DARPA metrics for success. The system demonstrated the ability to:
- Make decisions in multiple domains
- Acquire representations of human characteristics underlying their decisions
- Encourage willingness to delegate in subjects with medical expertise
What makes TAD especially transformative is its potential to redefine how humans and machines collaborate under pressure. By enabling AI systems to reason about goals, constraints, and preferences, TAD supports applications ranging from mission planning and decision support to critical care and education.
Future versions of the TAD system are expected to dramatically improve emergency medical decision-makingâoffering essential support in both military and civilian contexts. It could change how care is delivered when time, resources, and clarity are limited.
Project Closeout
As the TAD project concludes, the team reflects on its transition from idea to prototype and the valuable collaborations forged with government, academic, and commercial partners. These partnerships have played a pivotal role in demonstrating ITMâs potential to scale and influence the future of intelligent, trustworthy systems.
While the active research phase has ended, TAD leaves behind a flexible architecture and a robust foundation validated through real-world engagement. For those continuing the pursuit of AI that advances from mere responsiveness to genuine understanding and alignment with human values, TAD offers a compelling blueprint for what comes next.
###
About Parallax Advanced Research & The Ohio Aerospace Institute (OAI)
Parallax is a 501(c)(3) private nonprofit research institute that tackles global challenges through strategic partnerships with government, industry, and academia. It accelerates innovation, addresses critical global issues, and develops groundbreaking ideas with its partners. With offices in Ohio and Virginia, Parallax aims to deliver new solutions and speed them to market. In 2023, Parallax and OAI formed a collaborative affiliation to drive innovation and technological advancements in Ohio and for the nation. OAI plays a pivotal role in advancing the aerospace industry in Ohio and the nation by fostering collaborations between universities, aerospace industries, and government organizations, and managing aerospace research, education, and workforce development projects.
Frontgrade rubbing shoulders with Ericsson, Volvo and Saab?
www.linkedin.com
Annalena Johansson is the Business Development Manager at Frontgrade⌠| Frontgrade Gaisler
Annalena Johansson is the Business Development Manager at Frontgrade Gaisler and she is also on the board of the Rymdforum Association. Today Annalena did an excellent job leading the session on Space Supporting Commercial Needs at the Swedish Space Forum 2025, which offered a view by...
Last edited:
When the dusts settles and we have moved on from the ' he said/she said' stuff we can look for the positives.
It certainly has been a slow grind but as another poster said we are gaining traction.
Even Tony V said last AGM and again yesterday he is not happy with the pace.
Yes, we might be moving faster with a different CEO and or chairman but we will never know because the BOD and holders (via elections) are committed to the course and plan.
So we are seeing a lot of human nature venting on forums. That is just part of the journey. I note however despite setbacks a lot of poster holders have 'toughed' it out for what seems forever.
Once we land decent contract with a Big brand fish such as the US AFRL the 'takeup' dominoes will fall.
It will happen.
The Tech plan is sensational. Zero shot learning is evidently around but not on the Edge. We are in the process of moving/converting LLMs to the Edge.
That tells us that the Edge will be huge.
We are are still the leader at the Neuromorphic Edge.
The DOD transition to the Edge is real.
Cybersecurity is real.
I remain positive.
It certainly has been a slow grind but as another poster said we are gaining traction.
Even Tony V said last AGM and again yesterday he is not happy with the pace.
Yes, we might be moving faster with a different CEO and or chairman but we will never know because the BOD and holders (via elections) are committed to the course and plan.
So we are seeing a lot of human nature venting on forums. That is just part of the journey. I note however despite setbacks a lot of poster holders have 'toughed' it out for what seems forever.
Once we land decent contract with a Big brand fish such as the US AFRL the 'takeup' dominoes will fall.
It will happen.
The Tech plan is sensational. Zero shot learning is evidently around but not on the Edge. We are in the process of moving/converting LLMs to the Edge.
That tells us that the Edge will be huge.
We are are still the leader at the Neuromorphic Edge.
The DOD transition to the Edge is real.
Cybersecurity is real.
I remain positive.
Smoothsailing
Regular
Brainchip is a winning company that is back on track in a big way thanks to the hard working management Donât let the Parasites bring you down , their negativity that is constantly buzzing around requires a lot of fly spray remember they arenât worth a penny of your time itâs only their ignorance on display.
This company has brilliant tech and a brilliant team we are over the highest hurdleâs and about to be on center stage across many verticals. Have a wonderful day
Go brainchip
This company has brilliant tech and a brilliant team we are over the highest hurdleâs and about to be on center stage across many verticals. Have a wonderful day
Go brainchip
Quiltman
Regular
I also attended the AGM, for the duration, yesterday.
I strangely find myself emotionally detached from proceedings, and perhaps worthy of some reflection of what was said & transpired.
Basically, I witnessed a US board and executive management team struggling to communicate with an Australian shareholder base. There was a clear cultural divide. The forthright manner, and at times brash, manner of Australian shareholders visibly threw Antonio & Sean (in Australia, respect is earnt, not given). In Antonio, the fight or flight response was to fight. Make of that what you will. No doubt it was not Antonio's finest hour.
However, my take-out is that any redomicile is on the back-burner for a while. Any move to de-list would require 75% vote via a special resolution, there is no chance that is getting up when they can't get 50% for the renumeration package. This was made clear early in the AGM, and IMO in Antonio's attempt to backtrack on the re-domicile subject tripped himself up and looked rather silly. However, when all is said in done, I reckon no move to the US ( unless dual listing ) in the immediate future.
On the journey over the last couple of years, a difficult pill to swallow. Essentially, the tech wasn't "commercial ready" , and the BrainChip team were unable to complete any enduring commercial deals. The licensing deals that were done seemed to be adhoc in nature, without integration between the companies involved (essentially selling a shelf item, with no idea what happens when it leaves the store). As a result of the commercial failure, the last 2 years have been a "pivot", or what I would describe as a desperate push to build & correct the deficiences in the product offer to make it "commercial ready" before the whole house of cards caves in. Communication has been lacking, perhaps partly because internally they knew they had to get their "shit" together before any major PR campaigns ( or else risk exposure for what was lacking, and completely decimate shareholder value ). All a bit depressing, and just my view.
However, the good news, very good news in fact, is that it would seem that we are now "commercial ready". The technical position seems very strong. The technology path for the next few years, strong. The real proof however, is in the companies that are finally putting pen to paper and doing deals with BrainChip ( in an integrated partnership, with full sight on progress )- the ultimate proof that BrainChip is now " commercial ready". This list includes RTX, Onsor, Chelpis, Frontgrade and Information System Labs.
The discussions around how we renumerate & reward US executives and employees, in a highly competitive environment, in a pre-revenue listed entity, against a backdrop of an ASX listing with associated benchmarks ( RSU's vs Options is a great example ), will continue to generate much angst. I can see no way of resolving this tension until such time as BrainChip has delivered success ( as measured by revenue, not "bookings" ), and will need to be managed as well as is possible.
Believe it or not, after this ramble, I actually think Brainchip is in the best position it has been in "ever", and remove the emotion, because now would be exactly the wrong time to sell, and probably what many institutional investors are depending on.
I strangely find myself emotionally detached from proceedings, and perhaps worthy of some reflection of what was said & transpired.
Basically, I witnessed a US board and executive management team struggling to communicate with an Australian shareholder base. There was a clear cultural divide. The forthright manner, and at times brash, manner of Australian shareholders visibly threw Antonio & Sean (in Australia, respect is earnt, not given). In Antonio, the fight or flight response was to fight. Make of that what you will. No doubt it was not Antonio's finest hour.
However, my take-out is that any redomicile is on the back-burner for a while. Any move to de-list would require 75% vote via a special resolution, there is no chance that is getting up when they can't get 50% for the renumeration package. This was made clear early in the AGM, and IMO in Antonio's attempt to backtrack on the re-domicile subject tripped himself up and looked rather silly. However, when all is said in done, I reckon no move to the US ( unless dual listing ) in the immediate future.
On the journey over the last couple of years, a difficult pill to swallow. Essentially, the tech wasn't "commercial ready" , and the BrainChip team were unable to complete any enduring commercial deals. The licensing deals that were done seemed to be adhoc in nature, without integration between the companies involved (essentially selling a shelf item, with no idea what happens when it leaves the store). As a result of the commercial failure, the last 2 years have been a "pivot", or what I would describe as a desperate push to build & correct the deficiences in the product offer to make it "commercial ready" before the whole house of cards caves in. Communication has been lacking, perhaps partly because internally they knew they had to get their "shit" together before any major PR campaigns ( or else risk exposure for what was lacking, and completely decimate shareholder value ). All a bit depressing, and just my view.
However, the good news, very good news in fact, is that it would seem that we are now "commercial ready". The technical position seems very strong. The technology path for the next few years, strong. The real proof however, is in the companies that are finally putting pen to paper and doing deals with BrainChip ( in an integrated partnership, with full sight on progress )- the ultimate proof that BrainChip is now " commercial ready". This list includes RTX, Onsor, Chelpis, Frontgrade and Information System Labs.
The discussions around how we renumerate & reward US executives and employees, in a highly competitive environment, in a pre-revenue listed entity, against a backdrop of an ASX listing with associated benchmarks ( RSU's vs Options is a great example ), will continue to generate much angst. I can see no way of resolving this tension until such time as BrainChip has delivered success ( as measured by revenue, not "bookings" ), and will need to be managed as well as is possible.
Believe it or not, after this ramble, I actually think Brainchip is in the best position it has been in "ever", and remove the emotion, because now would be exactly the wrong time to sell, and probably what many institutional investors are depending on.
Jacob Kiraz
Member
Can someone tell me if the Renesas deal is dead in the water,
Are we in the Nitendo switch thru a megachips deal
Are we in the Nitendo switch thru a megachips deal
Morning Quiltman,
That was an excellent appraisal, I agree.
I notice that no one appears to have made comment on the excellent presentation that Dr. Johnathan, I thought he was great, he spoke
clearly, is an excellent asset to our engineering team and explained our future runway, finishing with the comment that Akida 3 will see us clear for the next decade (or words to that effect) ...a very precise, easy to follow presentation.
Noting that he has made the commitment to Sean that Akida 3 will be ready during the first quarter of 2026, as they are further down the
design phase than they had originally anticipated, so he has given a clear timeline, which I like.
To say or think that the staff have been cruising is not only very disrespectful but totally false, the entire team at Brainchip have been
digging in and working hard.
For Steve to gain entry to the Board, either someone had to step down or the Board? decided to increase the number to 7, he is well
qualified in my opinion, but the timing wasn't/isn't quite right, regarding the shareholder targeting Peter at the end was a disgrace, knowing Peter he would have been rather embarrassed, some of the comments I have read on this forum regarding this personal attack on our Founder were also disgusting!
Peter was clearly happy to chat with the shareholder privately, which is his right, rather than having his personal comments recorded forever
on the record, Peter has the highest integrity, loves this company, showed great respect in standing up and backing his CEO.
I'll always defend him, such a pity there aren't more humans on this planet with his heart, mind and attitude towards his fellow man.
God bless you Peter
Smoothsailing
Regular
No one knows about Nintendo yet as it wasnât discussed so itâs still on the table.
Renesas we were told hasnât use their license yet.
TheDrooben
Pretty Pretty Pretty Pretty Good
Might be wrong SS but I thought Sean said we wouldn't know if Renesas are using their licence until any products containing Akida are commercialised.......due to the licencee wanting to maintain their competitive advantage.
I did miss the last half hour or so though so it could have been mentioned again then
Happy as Larry
Andes are a big auto supplier to Renesas of RICS-V chips albeit to date the 32 version.
Appears we are integrating into their 64 chip.
If Renesas want access to access Neuromorphic AI at the Edge for auto they can back-door via Andes.
Tony V said they have no line of sight on what Renesas is doing - its their business. He or Sean also said some will buy a licence and never use it.
A growing Edge industry means Renesas IMO will have to at some point get access.
I think we all thought the original BOD 5 year approved plan must have been a typo and they really meant 2 years.
Turns out they meant 5 years after all.
After reading forums you would think we are in a mess and falling apart.
If it really is and always has been a 5 year plan then maybe we really are on course?
Turns out they meant 5 years after all.
After reading forums you would think we are in a mess and falling apart.
If it really is and always has been a 5 year plan then maybe we really are on course?
Smoothsailing
Regular
Yes 100% we are on course with a great company 2025 is our year
Go brainchip
Go brainchip
Similar threads
