That's right, it went nowhere (so far), so why are we all hyped up that this time will be different?And what?
Don't know what you are talking about?
That's right, it went nowhere (so far), so why are we all hyped up that this time will be different?And what?
Don't know what you are talking about?
It appears the USAFRL and Navy transition via believes we are up to it. Both potentially huge.Totally agree.
Currently, the company earns $0 in royalty fees, and our revenue doesn’t even come close to covering Sean’s salary. This leaves us with only two possible conclusions: either our product/technology is subpar, or our management is failing. Earlier this year, Sean loudly celebrated landing a “huge deal,” which turned out to be a partnership with a small company Onsor that sells student iPads. As expected, the deal brought in zero revenue. Sean has failed to deliver — it’s time for him to go.
I really don't think the ASX are terribly interested in looking after "mum and Dad retail" or anyone else in particular.It appears the USAFRL and Navy transition via believes we are up to it. Both potentially huge.
QV/Lockheed- Martin as well - game changer cybersecurity. Plus others that have come to light since Sept'24.
Example of how long it takes.
Renesas licenced AKIDA in Dec'20. Two years later after negotiating with clients it announced in Dec'22 it announced it was taping out a chip of its own containing AKIDA.
The taping process likely took 3 to 6 months.
The client was likely auto so the testing process could take years and if not safety related we may see something later this year. If its safety related testing takes a lot longer.
But the chip is surely with a client otherwise why would Renesas bother.
Because BRN is around 74% public/retail owned and the ASX knows its highly shorted and traded BRN cannot announce the slightest information that may have the slightest chance of creating a false market.
The ASX puts up with trader created pumps and dumps but would not tolerate BRN giving traders a sniff. Eg Merc news which were not even BRN created.
The reason is that the ASX knows in false markets shorters and traders take money from mum and dad retailers who often buy near tops when the excitement peaks.
BRN, a predominately retail held stock is easy money for them. They are out to take your money.
BRN cannot even give qualified estimates of Engagements ongoing, projected revenue timeframes etc. Traders would jump on and pump like no tomorrow and dump leaving mums and dads watching as it falls.
Sorry our revenue is not enough even to cover CFO salaries.Totally agree.
Currently, the company earns $0 in royalty fees, and our revenue doesn’t even come close to covering Sean’s salary. This leaves us with only two possible conclusions: either our product/technology is subpar, or our management is failing. Earlier this year, Sean loudly celebrated landing a “huge deal,” which turned out to be a partnership with a small company Onsor that sells student iPads. As expected, the deal brought in zero revenue. Sean has failed to deliver — it’s time for him to go.
They did not like the press BRN got covering the excitement and the huge number of complaints from those caught out.I really don't think the ASX are terribly interested in looking after "mum and Dad retail" or anyone else in particular.
All they want is volume transactions occurring as they make money every time a share changes hands.
This is why they not only tolerate but actively encourage both traders and shorter behaviour.
It pumps up the volume traded and they make more revenue.
FYI,
Under ASX Listing Rule 3.1A.1, incomplete engagements may not need to be disclosed if they meet certain criteria. Specifically, the rule provides an exception to disclosure if:
However, if the incomplete engagements are likely to have a material effect on the price or value of the company's securities, or if the ASX believes a false market exists due to rumors or speculation, the company may be required to disclose the information to correct or prevent the false market.
- The information concerns an incomplete proposal or negotiation.
- The information is confidential and has not been disclosed to the market.
- A reasonable person would not expect the information to be disclosed.
The problem is if they make any hints or announcements concerning engagements in any way, shape or form and there are rumors which creates a false market BRN is expected to breach NDA agreements by the ASX.
They may lose the deal as a result.
That is why we can't get the slightest sniff of what is happening in relation to engagements.
It may be frustrating but it's just the way it is.That is another problem in the Early Adoption cycle stage of techs - many clients do not want their competitors to know what they are doing hence NDA's.
Do you have any evidence that Renesas taped out an Akida chip? What sort of chip was it? Did they manufacture the chip after tape-out? Please provide any evidence you have. This could change everything!It appears the USAFRL and Navy transition via believes we are up to it. Both potentially huge.
QV/Lockheed- Martin as well - game changer cybersecurity. Plus others that have come to light since Sept'24.
Example of how long it takes.
Renesas licenced AKIDA in Dec'20. Two years later after negotiating with clients it announced in Dec'22 it announced it was taping out a chip of its own containing AKIDA.
The taping process likely took 3 to 6 months.
The client was likely auto so the testing process could take years and if not safety related we may see something later this year. If its safety related testing takes a lot longer.
But the chip is surely with a client otherwise why would Renesas bother.
Because BRN is around 74% public/retail owned and the ASX knows its highly shorted and traded BRN cannot announce the slightest information that may have the slightest chance of creating a false market.
The ASX puts up with trader created pumps and dumps but would not tolerate BRN giving traders a sniff. Eg Merc news which were not even BRN created.
The reason is that the ASX knows in false markets shorters and traders take money from mum and dad retailers who often buy near tops when the excitement peaks.
BRN, a predominately retail held stock is easy money for them. They are out to take your money.
BRN cannot even give qualified estimates of Engagements ongoing, projected revenue timeframes etc. Traders would jump on and pump like no tomorrow and dump leaving mums and dads watching as it falls.
Agree, BRN can claim any ongoing engagements should not be disclosed to the market and that would be fine.Hi Manny,
As you stated, "Under ASX Listing Rule 3.1A.1, incomplete engagements may not need to be disclosed".
The criteria above is VERY easy to meet IMO.
SIMPLES!!!
Don't disclose said engagements because they are incomplete and confidential!
That way, no one knows anything and you maintain complete CONFIDENTIALITY!
PS: Remember when the photo went up on LinkedIn or whatever, showing the employees from Raytheon?
Well, that wasn't as a result of the ASX demanding disclosure of an NDA or anything, it was just someone at BrainChip uploading a photo and claiming they were partners. BrainChip weren't forced to do that! Then later the photo was removed. But it wasn't because of the ASX disclosure rules as far as I understand it.
If I have have misread or misinterpreted any of this, please feel free to elaborate?
No direct evidence but there are 33 references to AKIDA on the Renesas website which i cannot get access to so not sure how reliable these references are. So losing a bit of confidence.Do you have any evidence that Renesas taped out an Akida chip? What sort of chip was it? Did they manufacture the chip after tape-out? Please provide any evidence you have. This could change everything!
Totally agree.
Currently, the company earns $0 in royalty fees, and our revenue doesn’t even come close to covering Sean’s salary. This leaves us with only two possible conclusions: either our product/technology is subpar, or our management is failing. Earlier this year, Sean loudly celebrated landing a “huge deal,” which turned out to be a partnership with a small company Onsor that sells student iPads. As expected, the deal brought in zero revenue. Sean has failed to deliver — it’s time for him to go.
That’s a question for Renesas they will keeping their secrets to them self IMODo you have any evidence that Renesas taped out an Akida chip? What sort of chip was it? Did they manufacture the chip after tape-out? Please provide any evidence you have. This could change everything!
Great. So why isn't Sean talking to all the 6G wireless networking companies? Why is he going to consumer expos instead? Is there a pico-chip we can fab and hand out? Does BRN have a 6G department/person actively reviewing how we can interact with the 6G companies? I don't get it.6G Wireless Networks: The Coming Convergence with Edge AI and Neuromorphic Computing
As the world begins to explore what comes after 5G, 6G wireless networks are rapidly emerging as a foundational technology for the next era of connectivity. With projected data rates of up to 1 Tbps, sub-millisecond latency, and the integration of terahertz (THz) spectrum, 6G is expected to redefine how we interact with machines, environments, and each other.
But raw speed alone won’t be enough. What will truly set 6G apart is its ability to support intelligence at the extreme edge—from autonomous vehicles and aerial drones to real-time holographic communication and tactile internet experiences. To meet these demands, neuromorphic computing and edge AI are becoming essential building blocks in the 6G ecosystem.
⸻
Why Neuromorphic Computing Matters for 6G
Unlike traditional CPUs or GPUs, neuromorphic processors are designed to mimic the brain’s event-driven, energy-efficient processing. In a 6G world where billions of edge devices need to make split-second decisions—without relying on centralized cloud computing—neuromorphic chips offer a low-power, high-speed solution