BRN Discussion Ongoing

TheDrooben

Pretty Pretty Pretty Pretty Good
Not much on the sell side this morning.......
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

7für7

Top 20

View attachment 79132
Well, great… just fantastic… You (not you personally) complained about the wrinkled tablecloth, and now it looks like we can’t even afford one anymore… And that kid, still wet behind the ears, has his hands in his pockets like he’s at McDonald’s waiting for his meal… A DISASTER!!!!!



1741821830910.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Thinking
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

HopalongPetrovski

I'm Spartacus!
No more news about this?
Hi Pom and all.
I don't quite get the relevance of gesture recognition.
What are the practical applications that it addresses?
I can see that it may be a handy aid for deaf people that sign and perhaps in the vacuum of space where sound hasn't a medium to propagate within.
Is it something to do with the proposed Nintendo gaming system?
I am not familiar with it so may be missing something relevant there.
Appreciate it if anyone here can enlighten me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Intels new CEO
 

Attachments

  • FC7EA276-CC46-471C-8D79-454485D2AC94.jpeg
    FC7EA276-CC46-471C-8D79-454485D2AC94.jpeg
    212.6 KB · Views: 114
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 3 users

miaeffect

Oat latte lover
Hi Pom and all.
I don't quite get the relevance of gesture recognition.
What are the practical applications that it addresses?
I can see that it may be a handy aid for deaf people that sign and perhaps in the vacuum of space where sound hasn't a medium to propagate within.
Is it something to do with the proposed Nintendo gaming system?
I am not familiar with it so may be missing something relevant there.
Appreciate it if anyone here can enlighten me.


This is just an example

Not saying we are in BMW "stop thinking 7**"
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Thinking
Reactions: 8 users
From Phil on hotcrapper

Valuing BrainChip’s IP as a standalone asset (assuming the company were sold purely as an IP play) requires assessing several factors, including:

  • Patent Portfolio Strength & Breadth
  • Commercial Viability & Licensing Potential
  • Market Comparables (IP Sales & Acquisitions)
  • Total Addressable Market (TAM) for Neuromorphic AI

1. BrainChip’s IP Portfolio Strength

BrainChip’s core IP is centered around:

  • AKIDA™ Neuromorphic Processor – A low-power AI accelerator using event-based processing.
  • TENN (Temporal Event-based Neural Networks) – Optimized for always-on AI applications.
  • AI Edge Processing Capabilities – Strong positioning in IoT, automotive, industrial, and consumer electronics.
BrainChip holds over 30 patents globally in neuromorphic computing, making it a pioneer in this space. However, neuromorphic computing is still anemerging field, meaning its commercial value is not yet fully realized.

2. Revenue Potential & Licensing Model

  • BrainChip’s IP value is closely tied to its licensing revenue model.
  • If a company like Qualcomm, Intel, or AMD licensed AKIDA/TENN, BrainChip could generate royalty streams per chip sold.
  • Licensing deals typically range from 2–5% of the ASP (average selling price) of a chip.
  • If BrainChip were to capture even 1% of the edge AI market, estimated at $80B by 2030, royalties could be in the range of $500M+ annually at scale.

3. Market Comparables – How Similar IP Deals Have Been Valued

Looking at previous semiconductor IP sales and acquisitions provides a benchmark:

Company / IPBuyerValuationRelevance
Arm Holdings (IP)Nvidia (attempted)$40B (deal failed)Leading AI/CPU licensing model
Movidius (Edge AI)Intel$400MAI edge processing IP
Habana Labs (AI)Intel$2BDeep learning acceleration
MIPS (Processor IP)Wave Computing$65MCPU IP licensing model
Ceva (DSP IP)N/A (public)~$800M market capAI & signal processing licensing model
Based on this, BrainChip’s IP value alone (excluding product revenue) could be conservatively estimated between $500M–$2B, depending on its market adoption and future licensing agreements.

4. Potential Buyers & Strategic Value

BrainChip’s IP would be most valuable to companies looking to dominate edge AI with ultra-low-power processing:

  • Qualcomm – To enhance Snapdragon/Dragonwing with neuromorphic capabilities.
  • Intel – To complement its AI accelerator roadmap.
  • NVIDIA – To strengthen edge AI efficiency alongside its GPU dominance.
  • Apple – To enhance the Neural Engine in iPhones & Apple Silicon.
  • Tesla / Automakers – For next-gen autonomous vehicle AI.
If a bidding war occurred, the valuation could push toward the higher end of the estimated range.

5. Estimated Pure IP Value Today

Based on market comparables, licensing potential, and strategic interest, BrainChip’s IP alone could be worth:

  • Low Case: ~$500M (limited licensing deals, slow adoption)
  • Mid Case: ~$1B (steady licensing, first major integrations)
  • High Case: ~$2B+ (if a major player like Qualcomm or NVIDIA commits to integration/licensing)
If a full acquisition were pursued, the deal could price in future growth potential, possibly exceeding $2B–$3B in a competitive buyout scenario.

Conclusion

If BrainChip were sold today as a pure IP play, a fair valuation would likely fall in the $500M to $2B range, depending on market traction and licensing agreements. However, if a major semiconductor company commits to integrating AKIDA/TENN, the valuation could significantly increase, possibly pushing toward$3B+ in a strategic acquisition.

United States dollars $$$ - not Australian.

Cheers. Phil
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 15 users

7für7

Top 20


This is just an example

Not saying we are in BMW "stop thinking 7**"

😂 but we will be inside everywhere according to the previous statement… YOU NEVER KNOOOOOW
 

Diogenese

Top 20
Hi Pom and all.
I don't quite get the relevance of gesture recognition.
What are the practical applications that it addresses?
I can see that it may be a handy aid for deaf people that sign and perhaps in the vacuum of space where sound hasn't a medium to propagate within.
Is it something to do with the proposed Nintendo gaming system?
I am not familiar with it so may be missing something relevant there.
Appreciate it if anyone here can enlighten me.
It is banned in Italy ...
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 15 users

7für7

Top 20
Still wondering if we play a role in this game… 🧐

„January 13, 2025 – Mercedes-Benz and Google Cloud have announced an expansion of their strategic partnership. As part of this, the MBUX Virtual Assistant will receive new conversational capabilities enabled by Google Cloud’s new Automotive AI Agent.

The Automotive AI Agent from Google Cloud was developed with Gemini via Vertex AI and is specifically tailored to the automotive industry. It can access information from the Google Maps platform to provide users with detailed and personalized answers to questions about navigation, points of interest, and more.“


 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Esq.111

Fascinatingly Intuitive.
Chippers ,

Not related in any way shape or form .

Getting that feeling....



Regards,
Esq.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 8 users

manny100

Regular
Still wondering if we play a role in this game… 🧐

„January 13, 2025 – Mercedes-Benz and Google Cloud have announced an expansion of their strategic partnership. As part of this, the MBUX Virtual Assistant will receive new conversational capabilities enabled by Google Cloud’s new Automotive AI Agent.

The Automotive AI Agent from Google Cloud was developed with Gemini via Vertex AI and is specifically tailored to the automotive industry. It can access information from the Google Maps platform to provide users with detailed and personalized answers to questions about navigation, points of interest, and more.“


IR confirmed recently that we still have a commercial relationship with the marquee clients disclosed on the " Why Invest" section of the website.
Mercedes included as a major client.
If any of the marquee clients drop off that section of the website will be amended.
" Marquee brands include Mercedes, Valeo, Vorago, and NASA, and commercial IP licenses with Renesas and MegaChips. Commercial availability of semiconductor chips, IP, tools, and boards."
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 10 users

7für7

Top 20
Since Bravo has recently been using ChatGPT as a source more often, I thought I’d give it a try too… I should have just left it alone 😂😂

The probability that Mercedes will equip its new CLA with BrainChip Skids depends on several factors:

1. Previous Collaboration: Mercedes has already used BrainChip in the Vision EQXX, showing that they are open to the technology.

2. Technological Need: If Mercedes requires particularly energy-efficient AI processing for the CLA, BrainChip could be an option.

3. MB.OS Strategy: Mercedes is developing its own operating system, MB.OS. If they prioritize larger partners like Nvidia or Qualcomm, this could reduce BrainChip’s chances.

4. Skid Technology: If BrainChip’s Skids offer meaningful applications for the CLA (e.g., advanced driver assistance or infotainment), the likelihood increases.

Assessment:

Without insider information, it’s difficult to determine an exact probability. However, based on these factors, I would estimate a moderate to low probability – perhaps 20-40%, unless new information emerges.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

7für7

Top 20
IR confirmed recently that we still have a commercial relationship with the marquee clients disclosed on the " Why Invest" section of the website.
Mercedes included as a major client.
If any of the marquee clients drop off that section of the website will be amended.
" Marquee brands include Mercedes, Valeo, Vorago, and NASA, and commercial IP licenses with Renesas and MegaChips. Commercial availability of semiconductor chips, IP, tools, and boards."
Yes I know that. I’m just curious, if we are involved, on wich form. And if they will mention us or we will just be part of them without further details.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

MDhere

Top 20
Remember this corker of a quote from Spencer Huang, Chief Revenue Officer at Edge Impulse when he was being interviewed by Nandan Nayampally, CMO at BrainChip in the January 2024 podcast.

"I really applaud BrainChip for your technology and your intellectual property and I see every silicon vendor, every device will have your technology or neuromorphic-type technology in it. AI accelerate. This is going to be the norm."

11.54 mins



Then there was also the January 2025 podcast where Spencer Huang talked about how AKIDA is pushing the boundaries of what is possible in edge AI and "making science fiction a reality".

So, if AKIDA is pushing the boundaries of what is possible in edge AI and Qualcomm want to dominate the edge AI market, then wouldn't it make sense for Qualcomm to want to collaborate with us?





View attachment 78968

The other thing to note on this when Spencer Huang (Chief Revenue Officer) did the podcast in January 2025 with Steve Brightfield, it's very likely that the Qualcomm deal was already in play and being implemented as Qualcomm and Edge Impulse were very organised with new banners and lanyards to say the least for the upcoming event for March announcement.

On the 15 january 2025 podcast at the 16.30 min mark to 17:12 sums our our continued strong involvement which I a certain Spencer Huang would have known the Qualcomm deal.




16:28
all the these exciting new products and
16:30
Innovations yeah and and I want to thank
16:32
brain chip and the listeners you know um
16:34
I mentioned this earlier before there
16:36
was a a lot of this cool stuff maybe we
16:39
we talk about science fiction but with
16:41
brain chip and what we're doing and
16:43
we're pushing the boundaries and we're
16:45
we're making this science fiction into
16:47
reality and so we're making these
16:49
devices smarter one one one device at a
16:52
time and really do appreciate kind of
16:54
Through The Years working and partnering
16:56
with you as we're starting to turn this
16:57
into a reality
16:59
well Spencer thank you very much from
17:01
brain chip for your continued support
17:03
and our collaboration and we look to do
17:05
a lot of exciting uh uh you know
17:08
demonstrations and uh product
17:10
realizations in 2025 absolutely thank
17:12
you everyone thank you
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 14 users

TECH

Regular
From Phil on hotcrapper

Valuing BrainChip’s IP as a standalone asset (assuming the company were sold purely as an IP play) requires assessing several factors, including:

  • Patent Portfolio Strength & Breadth
  • Commercial Viability & Licensing Potential
  • Market Comparables (IP Sales & Acquisitions)
  • Total Addressable Market (TAM) for Neuromorphic AI

1. BrainChip’s IP Portfolio Strength

BrainChip’s core IP is centered around:

  • AKIDA™ Neuromorphic Processor – A low-power AI accelerator using event-based processing.
  • TENN (Temporal Event-based Neural Networks) – Optimized for always-on AI applications.
  • AI Edge Processing Capabilities – Strong positioning in IoT, automotive, industrial, and consumer electronics.
BrainChip holds over 30 patents globally in neuromorphic computing, making it a pioneer in this space. However, neuromorphic computing is still anemerging field, meaning its commercial value is not yet fully realized.

2. Revenue Potential & Licensing Model

  • BrainChip’s IP value is closely tied to its licensing revenue model.
  • If a company like Qualcomm, Intel, or AMD licensed AKIDA/TENN, BrainChip could generate royalty streams per chip sold.
  • Licensing deals typically range from 2–5% of the ASP (average selling price) of a chip.
  • If BrainChip were to capture even 1% of the edge AI market, estimated at $80B by 2030, royalties could be in the range of $500M+ annually at scale.

3. Market Comparables – How Similar IP Deals Have Been Valued

Looking at previous semiconductor IP sales and acquisitions provides a benchmark:

Company / IPBuyerValuationRelevance
Arm Holdings (IP)Nvidia (attempted)$40B (deal failed)Leading AI/CPU licensing model
Movidius (Edge AI)Intel$400MAI edge processing IP
Habana Labs (AI)Intel$2BDeep learning acceleration
MIPS (Processor IP)Wave Computing$65MCPU IP licensing model
Ceva (DSP IP)N/A (public)~$800M market capAI & signal processing licensing model
Based on this, BrainChip’s IP value alone (excluding product revenue) could be conservatively estimated between $500M–$2B, depending on its market adoption and future licensing agreements.

4. Potential Buyers & Strategic Value

BrainChip’s IP would be most valuable to companies looking to dominate edge AI with ultra-low-power processing:

  • Qualcomm – To enhance Snapdragon/Dragonwing with neuromorphic capabilities.
  • Intel – To complement its AI accelerator roadmap.
  • NVIDIA – To strengthen edge AI efficiency alongside its GPU dominance.
  • Apple – To enhance the Neural Engine in iPhones & Apple Silicon.
  • Tesla / Automakers – For next-gen autonomous vehicle AI.
If a bidding war occurred, the valuation could push toward the higher end of the estimated range.

5. Estimated Pure IP Value Today

Based on market comparables, licensing potential, and strategic interest, BrainChip’s IP alone could be worth:

  • Low Case: ~$500M (limited licensing deals, slow adoption)
  • Mid Case: ~$1B (steady licensing, first major integrations)
  • High Case: ~$2B+ (if a major player like Qualcomm or NVIDIA commits to integration/licensing)
If a full acquisition were pursued, the deal could price in future growth potential, possibly exceeding $2B–$3B in a competitive buyout scenario.

Conclusion

If BrainChip were sold today as a pure IP play, a fair valuation would likely fall in the $500M to $2B range, depending on market traction and licensing agreements. However, if a major semiconductor company commits to integrating AKIDA/TENN, the valuation could significantly increase, possibly pushing toward$3B+ in a strategic acquisition.

United States dollars $$$ - not Australian.

Cheers. Phil


Hi Smooth,

That just puts into prospective what T......Fact Finder allegedly said that, he wouldn't sell Brainchip shares for anything less than
$40.00 a share (I assume that if that is actually what he said, he was referring to AUD).

That would value our company as a stand-alone operator at around 84 Billion AUD.

As a great Australian quote, from the movie many would remember..........."Tell him he's dreaming" !!!!!!

I do know of someone who once upon a time mentioned 10.5 Billion AUD would be fair value based on todays shares listed on market.

We ALL KNOW WE HAVE SOMETHING SPECIAL, but sadly the market is still catching up, being allegedly 3 plus years ahead has presented
our company with some major headwinds, it's never ever an easy gig being so far ahead of the general masses, but once the adoption
commences, we are really positioned at the top of the grid......let the race commence.

Regards...........Tech.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Wow
Reactions: 10 users

manny100

Regular
Yes I know that. I’m just curious, if we are involved, on wich form. And if they will mention us or we will just be part of them without further details.
IR did not divulge that information. I guess it depends whether Mercedes want the 'future' now or later.
 

manny100

Regular
Hi Smooth,

That just puts into prospective what T......Fact Finder allegedly said that, he wouldn't sell Brainchip shares for anything less than
$40.00 a share (I assume that if that is actually what he said, he was referring to AUD).

That would value our company as a stand-alone operator at around 84 Billion AUD.

As a great Australian quote, from the movie many would remember..........."Tell him he's dreaming" !!!!!!

I do know of someone who once upon a time mentioned 10.5 Billion AUD would be fair value based on todays shares listed on market.

We ALL KNOW WE HAVE SOMETHING SPECIAL, but sadly the market is still catching up, being allegedly 3 plus years ahead has presented
our company with some major headwinds, it's never ever an easy gig being so far ahead of the general masses, but once the adoption
commences, we are really positioned at the top of the grid......let the race commence.

Regards...........Tech.
Yep, the market is catching up. One thing we know for sure is that we have had quite a few validation events since last Sept'24.
Traders in the main prefer Exponential moving averages (EMA's) rather than Simple moving averages because EMA's put more weight on recent events.
In our case we should be taking a leaf out of the EMA book and putting weight on the validation events since Sept'24.
Events prior to Sept'24 should be given little or no weight.
Not only is the market catching up but the future is starting to close in on us as well.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 2 users
Hi Smooth,

That just puts into prospective what T......Fact Finder allegedly said that, he wouldn't sell Brainchip shares for anything less than
$40.00 a share (I assume that if that is actually what he said, he was referring to AUD).

That would value our company as a stand-alone operator at around 84 Billion AUD.

As a great Australian quote, from the movie many would remember..........."Tell him he's dreaming" !!!!!!

I do know of someone who once upon a time mentioned 10.5 Billion AUD would be fair value based on todays shares listed on market.

We ALL KNOW WE HAVE SOMETHING SPECIAL, but sadly the market is still catching up, being allegedly 3 plus years ahead has presented
our company with some major headwinds, it's never ever an easy gig being so far ahead of the general masses, but once the adoption
commences, we are really positioned at the top of the grid......let the race commence.

Regards...........Tech.
I have good feeling our lead of 3 years has its benefits altho it has been slow on the uptake it also has given us Lea way to create many more models in preparation for the masses which are now awakened to Neuromorphic compute ready for 2025/6 mass production.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
From Phil on hotcrapper

Valuing BrainChip’s IP as a standalone asset (assuming the company were sold purely as an IP play) requires assessing several factors, including:

  • Patent Portfolio Strength & Breadth
  • Commercial Viability & Licensing Potential
  • Market Comparables (IP Sales & Acquisitions)
  • Total Addressable Market (TAM) for Neuromorphic AI

1. BrainChip’s IP Portfolio Strength

BrainChip’s core IP is centered around:

  • AKIDA™ Neuromorphic Processor – A low-power AI accelerator using event-based processing.
  • TENN (Temporal Event-based Neural Networks) – Optimized for always-on AI applications.
  • AI Edge Processing Capabilities – Strong positioning in IoT, automotive, industrial, and consumer electronics.
BrainChip holds over 30 patents globally in neuromorphic computing, making it a pioneer in this space. However, neuromorphic computing is still anemerging field, meaning its commercial value is not yet fully realized.

2. Revenue Potential & Licensing Model

  • BrainChip’s IP value is closely tied to its licensing revenue model.
  • If a company like Qualcomm, Intel, or AMD licensed AKIDA/TENN, BrainChip could generate royalty streams per chip sold.
  • Licensing deals typically range from 2–5% of the ASP (average selling price) of a chip.
  • If BrainChip were to capture even 1% of the edge AI market, estimated at $80B by 2030, royalties could be in the range of $500M+ annually at scale.

3. Market Comparables – How Similar IP Deals Have Been Valued

Looking at previous semiconductor IP sales and acquisitions provides a benchmark:

Company / IPBuyerValuationRelevance
Arm Holdings (IP)Nvidia (attempted)$40B (deal failed)Leading AI/CPU licensing model
Movidius (Edge AI)Intel$400MAI edge processing IP
Habana Labs (AI)Intel$2BDeep learning acceleration
MIPS (Processor IP)Wave Computing$65MCPU IP licensing model
Ceva (DSP IP)N/A (public)~$800M market capAI & signal processing licensing model
Based on this, BrainChip’s IP value alone (excluding product revenue) could be conservatively estimated between $500M–$2B, depending on its market adoption and future licensing agreements.

4. Potential Buyers & Strategic Value

BrainChip’s IP would be most valuable to companies looking to dominate edge AI with ultra-low-power processing:

  • Qualcomm – To enhance Snapdragon/Dragonwing with neuromorphic capabilities.
  • Intel – To complement its AI accelerator roadmap.
  • NVIDIA – To strengthen edge AI efficiency alongside its GPU dominance.
  • Apple – To enhance the Neural Engine in iPhones & Apple Silicon.
  • Tesla / Automakers – For next-gen autonomous vehicle AI.
If a bidding war occurred, the valuation could push toward the higher end of the estimated range.

5. Estimated Pure IP Value Today

Based on market comparables, licensing potential, and strategic interest, BrainChip’s IP alone could be worth:

  • Low Case: ~$500M (limited licensing deals, slow adoption)
  • Mid Case: ~$1B (steady licensing, first major integrations)
  • High Case: ~$2B+ (if a major player like Qualcomm or NVIDIA commits to integration/licensing)
If a full acquisition were pursued, the deal could price in future growth potential, possibly exceeding $2B–$3B in a competitive buyout scenario.

Conclusion

If BrainChip were sold today as a pure IP play, a fair valuation would likely fall in the $500M to $2B range, depending on market traction and licensing agreements. However, if a major semiconductor company commits to integrating AKIDA/TENN, the valuation could significantly increase, possibly pushing toward$3B+ in a strategic acquisition.

United States dollars $$$ - not Australian.

Cheers. Phil
Fact finders responded to the above

Thanks Philip 1965 for all your GENAi analysis.

There are always issues with GENAi analysis in my experience and these are the issues I see with what has been presented.

1. In the comparison with Snapdragon technology it is clear that it is only comparing AKD1000 but does not specify this to be the case using the generic AKIDA terminology. AKD1000 while exceptional technology has been improved in further developments of the AKIDA technology family with the introduction of AKD1500, AKIDA 2.0 TENNS/Vit and Pico. For example it makes the point about AKD1000 not being able to process camera feeds with the same accuracy yet this is what AKIDA 2.0 Vit addresses even before the later advances with TENNS comes into consideration.

2. Then in considering a valuation of Brainchip it ignores the ability of AKIDA Pico to bring LLM's and GENAi to micro dot chips in unconnected low powered devices. This being something which is clearly beneficial in mobile phones but which is way beyond anything Qualcomm can offer.

3. It ignores the fact that AKD1000 has been proven as being capable of replacing GPUs for various applications by Edge Impulse, ISL, Quantum Ventura, Bascom Hunter etc;

4. It ignores the fact that AKD1000 has been shown to be capable of ZeroEnergy applications in particular cognitive communications by Ericsson and ISL which opens up commercial opportunities in 5 & 6 G networks and Satellite communication systems.

5. It ignores the fact that AKD1000 has been proven by ISL to have the ability to make all radar intelligent in ultra low power small form factor.

6. It ignores the fact that TENNS, Pleiades, aTENNuate and Centaurus have the ability to be implemented in data centres to dramatically improve the power consumption and performance of conventional data centres even if not being implemented on AKIDA technology.

7. It ignores the cyber security applications for AKD1000 proven by Quantum Ventura.

I could go on but I think you should ask your GENAi platform how up to date the information is that it relies upon to provide the analysis as it has been the case that it was running about 2 years behind. I have had many apologies when I have asked it why it did not have regard to certain known facts it advising that these facts were too recent.

I also think it would be useful to ask it to specify which AKIDA technology it is referring to rather than lumping it under the term AKIDA when AKIDA technology covers multiple iterations and presently can be manufactured in one node configurations right through to 256 node configurations based upon AKD1000 IP, AKD1500 IP and AKIDA 2.0 IP.

My opinion only DYOR

Fact Finder
 
Top Bottom