BRN Discussion Ongoing

uiux

Regular
NOPE just feelin lied to by our CEO, no big Defence contractor contract signing as promised before the quarterly,or has everyone already forgotten that, as usual management are full of shit and it’s wearing thin


Do you have an extract with this promise in it ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users
So, like most, I've been checking out diff partners sites when I get the chance and this guy popped up on DeGirum from a couple of days ago.

Profile isn't public but full name is, so I searched that and this guy below stood out as a co-author on a paper from late last year titled "Spiking neural networks for autonomous driving: A review".

It was also co-authored by someone affiliated with VW and did contain sections on Akida as well as some other processors so I presume, rightly or wrongly, it could be this R Parada.

If so, it would appear he would like to get his hands on or run some models / code on Akida.

DeGirum can assist by the looks with their hosting set up.

Maybe BRN HO shpuld flip him a PCIe or M.2 to play and research with.

Further details of the paper etc below.



Screenshot_2025-02-12-18-38-39-68_4641ebc0df1485bf6b47ebd018b5ee76.jpg

Screenshot_2025-02-12-18-39-08-99_4641ebc0df1485bf6b47ebd018b5ee76.jpg



IMG_20250212_192640.jpg






Tha paper published Oct last year (didn't search if previously posted here).



IMG_20250212_185018.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 27 users

Diogenese

Top 20
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users
Thanks Diogenese , He has an exceptional resume in the field of Neuromorphic compute, interesting Dylan now resides in Perth. I wonder if he and Peter were mates or colleagues at some point.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Esq.111

Fascinatingly Intuitive.
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 11 users
View attachment 77536




What is “Joy-Con drift”?​

Joy-Con drift is an issue that Switch owners have been encountering over the last few months that causes the analog sticks on the controllers to randomly move around and input commands to the console, even when they’re not being physically moved.






Pre-cognitive controllers sound a little like science fiction, but the patent details a software feature that would learn from your gameplay. Over time it seems like the Switch 2 would learn from your gaming patterns and use that information to speed up button presses and other input.

It sounds a little unbelievable, but with AI on hand it might not be that unrealistic. However this sort of tech has the potential to cause problems.

The first big problem is that this feature would have to track and analyze all your gameplay in order to make these predictions. Which is something that a bunch of people may not want to see happening. There’s also the question of what happens if the console gets it wrong, and tries to initiate a button press that you didn’t intend on making.





Did I predict this Nintendo switch controller feature?

Does this patent potentially solve drift?
Brilliant
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

TheDrooben

Pretty Pretty Pretty Pretty Good
View attachment 77536




What is “Joy-Con drift”?​

Joy-Con drift is an issue that Switch owners have been encountering over the last few months that causes the analog sticks on the controllers to randomly move around and input commands to the console, even when they’re not being physically moved.






Pre-cognitive controllers sound a little like science fiction, but the patent details a software feature that would learn from your gameplay. Over time it seems like the Switch 2 would learn from your gaming patterns and use that information to speed up button presses and other input.

It sounds a little unbelievable, but with AI on hand it might not be that unrealistic. However this sort of tech has the potential to cause problems.

The first big problem is that this feature would have to track and analyze all your gameplay in order to make these predictions. Which is something that a bunch of people may not want to see happening. There’s also the question of what happens if the console gets it wrong, and tries to initiate a button press that you didn’t intend on making.





Did I predict this Nintendo switch controller feature?

Does this patent potentially solve drift?

Sony also looking at predictive gameplay........


Screenshot_20250213_092151_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20250213_092138_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20250213_091941_Chrome.jpg


Happy as Larry
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 43 users

7für7

Top 20
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 27 users

Tezza

Regular
If our product is so good why can we only join partnerships? If it's so good why can't we say " you want it you pay". If we keep joining partnerships without deals, surely someone somewhere will find a better way. IM NERVOUS
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Sad
Reactions: 11 users

suss

Regular
If our product is so good why can we only join partnerships? If it's so good why can't we say " you want it you pay". If we keep joining partnerships without deals, surely someone somewhere will find a better way. IM NERVOUS
Partner = enabler/channel for commercial products
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

jrp173

Member
Partner = enabler/channel for commercial products
How many of these partners have resulted commercial products? Until this happens, we're all just in a holding pattern.. The nervousness is understandable....
 

Bravo

If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
With any luck this standardized benchmarking framework will help BrainChip to validate Akida's performance and efficiency compared with conventional methods.




Screenshot 2025-02-13 at 11.55.22 am.png



 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 23 users

Iseki

Regular
We have entered that "period again"...the no solid news, but the solid speculative news !

Does anybody here think that Peters et al technology is being purposely held back, so other unnamed companies can "catch up" ?

The fact no company has signed a solid license agreement really bothers me, yes I know all about Renasas & MegaChips, but that in was 2020, wasn't it ?

Currently, the trading, (manipulation) pattern is so, so obvious, please don't give your shares away, that's not financial advice, that's " common sense"..hang tough, it's a real tug of war between "good and greedy".

No disrespect to my friend Peter, but I personally like how Tony speaks his truth on Linkedin and conducts himself on/in podcasts and interviews, he's honest and positive, and in many ways he is really blessed to have been given this opportunity from both Peter and Anil...when we "finally" succeed, please remember to acknowledge my friends, without them, Brainchip wouldn't exist.

Fact.....Akida we all ❤️ u....Tech.

Yes, absolutely.

eg It's hard to understand the delay in signing up the sub-contractor for the AFRL deal.

I asked TD if BRN would announce the signing when it happens on the ASX, and he replied that it most likely would.
But with the delay lengthening, the same thought came to my mind, that RTX, or whoever the subcontractor might be, are not as committed as the AFRL.

This pattern seems to be same as with MB, Renesas, and other companies who are not supporting us financially, the very same companies who, ironically, suffered badly with supply chain issues in the past, and who, with a bit of work, could own their own chip that could be manufactured in multiple countries.

Clearly potential customers wanting to trial us would be also looking at what alternatives like NVIDIA have to offer with non-neuromorphic NPU's

I'd say that we are probably being held back by the constant fear amongst our potential clients that mega companies like NVIDIA and INTEL will destroy us or anyone wanting to use us in the future. You know the (unwritten) spiel - If you add an Akida chip to an NVIDIA system, then you will lose all the NVIDIA support you are currently receiving.


Sean is a bit to blame, as his vision of us surviving in a few thousand drive-thru's or a few thousand satelites never looked feasible, especially since Akida was to be everywhere. Similarly the whole concept of an edge-box seems like waving the white flag: It's not up to BRN to find a use case for akida, so here, try yourself...

Whoever on the board stated that NVIDIA wasn't going to be a competitor but rather a partner, clearly doesn't know NVIDIA.

It will always seem impossible to break into the old boys club and I would love to see BRN do a joint venture in a product that goes up against a popular non-neuromorphic ai product. We retail investors are a hardy lot, so let the games begin.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 16 users
Yes, absolutely.

eg It's hard to understand the delay in signing up the sub-contractor for the AFRL deal.

I asked TD if BRN would announce the signing when it happens on the ASX, and he replied that it most likely would.
But with the delay lengthening, the same thought came to my mind, that RTX, or whoever the subcontractor might be, are not as committed as the AFRL.

This pattern seems to be same as with MB, Renesas, and other companies who are not supporting us financially, the very same companies who, ironically, suffered badly with supply chain issues in the past, and who, with a bit of work, could own their own chip that could be manufactured in multiple countries.

Clearly potential customers wanting to trial us would be also looking at what alternatives like NVIDIA have to offer with non-neuromorphic NPU's

I'd say that we are probably being held back by the constant fear amongst our potential clients that mega companies like NVIDIA and INTEL will destroy us or anyone wanting to use us in the future. You know the (unwritten) spiel - If you add an Akida chip to an NVIDIA system, then you will lose all the NVIDIA support you are currently receiving.


Sean is a bit to blame, as his vision of us surviving in a few thousand drive-thru's or a few thousand satelites never looked feasible, especially since Akida was to be everywhere. Similarly the whole concept of an edge-box seems like waving the white flag: It's not up to BRN to find a use case for akida, so here, try yourself...

Whoever on the board stated that NVIDIA wasn't going to be a competitor but rather a partner, clearly doesn't know NVIDIA.

It will always seem impossible to break into the old boys club and I would love to see BRN do a joint venture in a product that goes up against a popular non-neuromorphic ai product. We retail investors are a hardy lot, so let the games begin.
Games have been going on for years getting sick of them that’s for sure, however I still believe we will hear an announcement prior to AGM.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 5 users

Iseki

Regular
Games have been going on for years getting sick of them that’s for sure, however I still believe we will hear an announcement prior to AGM.
Hope so but this time last year we were all hoping for the same thing. The SP spiked from 16c to 48c in the weeks prior to the AGM on this same hope. Then the AGM was released with nothing new was announced and the SP slid back down to 16c after two months.

I guess the BoM can't really time their announcements to fit in with AGM's - if a deal comes in, it has to be announced straight away - so the ann. would have to be a matter of change of BRN strategy going forward.
 
  • Fire
Reactions: 1 users
Hope so but this time last year we were all hoping for the same thing. The SP spiked from 16c to 48c in the weeks prior to the AGM on this same hope. Then the AGM was released with nothing new was announced and the SP slid back down to 16c after two months.

I guess the BoM can't really time their announcements to fit in with AGM's - if a deal comes in, it has to be announced straight away - so the ann. would have to be a matter of change of BRN strategy going forward.
I disagree with your analogy and believe they are steering the ship not the shareholders and can time their announcements accordingly to a degree that works best for the company.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

toasty

Regular
I disagree with your analogy and believe they are steering the ship not the shareholders and can time their announcements accordingly to a degree that works best for the company.
They cannot time their announcements to suit the company. The regulations are quite clear about what can be announced and when. If it is a material matter, the board has no choice, except in some special circumstances. My current view is that there are a lot of parties interested but noone is yet willing to stump up the cash. The prospects may well be in the "noone ever got fired for buying big blue" stage...........
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Fire
Reactions: 8 users
Games have been going on for years getting sick of them that’s for sure, however I still believe we will hear an announcement prior to AGM.
1739416795741.gif
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

rgupta

Regular
Yes, absolutely.

eg It's hard to understand the delay in signing up the sub-contractor for the AFRL deal.

I asked TD if BRN would announce the signing when it happens on the ASX, and he replied that it most likely would.
But with the delay lengthening, the same thought came to my mind, that RTX, or whoever the subcontractor might be, are not as committed as the AFRL.

This pattern seems to be same as with MB, Renesas, and other companies who are not supporting us financially, the very same companies who, ironically, suffered badly with supply chain issues in the past, and who, with a bit of work, could own their own chip that could be manufactured in multiple countries.

Clearly potential customers wanting to trial us would be also looking at what alternatives like NVIDIA have to offer with non-neuromorphic NPU's

I'd say that we are probably being held back by the constant fear amongst our potential clients that mega companies like NVIDIA and INTEL will destroy us or anyone wanting to use us in the future. You know the (unwritten) spiel - If you add an Akida chip to an NVIDIA system, then you will lose all the NVIDIA support you are currently receiving.


Sean is a bit to blame, as his vision of us surviving in a few thousand drive-thru's or a few thousand satelites never looked feasible, especially since Akida was to be everywhere. Similarly the whole concept of an edge-box seems like waving the white flag: It's not up to BRN to find a use case for akida, so here, try yourself...

Whoever on the board stated that NVIDIA wasn't going to be a competitor but rather a partner, clearly doesn't know NVIDIA.

It will always seem impossible to break into the old boys club and I would love to see BRN do a joint venture in a product that goes up against a popular non-neuromorphic ai product. We retail investors are a hardy lot, so let the games begin.
If new sub contractor is still not assigned then how brainchip told us on asx that subcontractor costs can be around $800000 for the project.
Also if the team brainchip is so slow in such a big contract then what to expect from them?
That is where team brainchip jumps on a news without thinking ahead, how the market will perceive the same.
e.g last time about akida edge boxes, team brainchip start making noises somewhere mid 23 that it will be launched end 23 and even after end 24 we have no revenue from edge boxes.
To me it is a very communication, if it is right.
Dyor
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Top Bottom