Just so long as the hiring of sales staff isn't a 'Hail Mary' from the company because the current staff have failed to get results.
Just so long as the hiring of sales staff isn't a 'Hail Mary' from the company because the current staff have failed to get results.
I see the potential here otherwise I’d have sold, but many (tech) companies have done very well despite poor global economics.
I’m just saying I and other expected more, and if we don’t want to crash and burn, we need to start seeing some revenue. We aren’t government funded R&D, we’re a publicly funded company and the expectation at this stage is commercial interest, revenue, and a ROI.
This is they the SP is dropping and this is why shorts are raising.
Show me some contracts!
JB you've done it again!Apologies if already shared. Note the case study on page 6.
wouldn't you know it?!Are you sure @Fact Finder is not ChatGPT?
After all where else would find such encyclopedic recall and analysis?
Great find generously shared.Apologies if already shared. Note the case study on page 6.
Proof?Just so long as the hiring of sales staff isn't a 'Hail Mary' from the company because the current staff have failed to get results.
I will be seeking to join my action against you to their proceedings so you might like to let your lawyers know.wouldn't you know it?!
Even after the homily I delivered the other day about the danger of defaming someone on the internet, immediately after comparing @Fact Finder and ChatGPT, I received a defamation suit from
...
ChatGpt!
Yep that was a strange thing to say!!!!!Proof?
Stop misleading new investors.
Enough is enough.
Had to do a little digging on that as with most thing you post
For what it's worth, I'm appreciative of your narrative mate. Granted, it's leaning towards the pessimistic, but I think that's needed and warranted. It'd be a shame to see you pull back, but if it's for your wellbeing, then by all means.I’m sick of hearing my own voice at this stage, and can see I’m ruffling feathers so I think I need to stop posting for a while.
I’ll be the first to congratulate the team if something positive is announced.
Cheers,
Mark
The thing is AKD2000 or ACE or whatever it’s called is to have both transformers and LSTM and while I am an old technophobe the reading I did on Transformers confirmed an interplay between them and LSTM.I also thought this tweet looked promising when I first saw it, but in the referenced article they state that transformers are superior to LSTM. And they go on to give an example of visual processing where the parallel processing of distant pixels, gives transformers another advantage.
I did not see that article as supporting BrainChip’s LSTM aspirations.
From the referenced article:
”Unlike RNNs and LSTMs that must read a string of text sequentially, transformers are significantly more parallelizable and can read in a complete sequence of words at once, allowing them to better learn contextual relationships between words in a text string.”
and
View attachment 26753
Great find generously shared.
To assist I will add the following extract which makes clear that Accenture have most likely been testing either Loihi 2 or AKIDA technology as referenced at page 6:
“Some people approximate derivatives of spikes in order to use backpropagation (like SynSense) and some use another technique called spike timing dependent plasticity (STDP), which is closer to how biological brains function. STDP, however, is less mature as a technology (BrainChip uses this method for one–shot learning at the edge)”
![]()
SynSense | Cars That Think Like You- EETimes | SynSense
Cars That Think Like You - EETimes By Sally Ward-Foxton 07.22.2022 Car makers are checking out neuromorphic technology to implement AI–powered features such as keyword spotting, driver attention, and passenger behavior monitoring. Imitating biological brain processes is alluring because it...www.synsense.ai
We know that SynSense has been working with BMW and Prophesee but as this extract from an article promoted by SynSense on its website makes clear it does not use STDP.
It also confirms what we know that Brainchip uses STDP but what it does not mention is that Brainchip owns the IP for the STDP based JAST Learning Rules which they converted from a license to full ownership in the first half of 2023 under the leadership of the CEO Sean Hehir. Some think this was a stroke of commercial brilliance.
What some might not know is that when Peter van der Made bought the original license CERCO had been discussing terms with Intel and Peter van der Made slipped in underneath and walked away with the prize.
So while Mike Davies and Intel use a form of STDP they are at a significant disadvantage absent the right to use the JAST Learning Rules.
If the vehicle manufacturer is Honda we know Valeo is involved so Brainchip has feet on the ground so to speak.
If Mercedes Benz is the vehicle manufacturer it cannot be anyone else unless this testing by Accenture was about year or so before the CES 2022 EQXX reveal when Intel was still working with Mercedes Benz before they switched to Brainchip.
The Accenture Brainchip podcast is going to be very interesting.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Read my post in context you FW. This is a possible alternative unless you have irrefutable proof otherwise.
But here's a start for you and all new investors who you've apparently taken under your wing: Revenue = sales = sales staff doing their jobs!
I imagine transformers as Big Long-Short Term Memory with added logic (BLSTMWAL).The thing is AKD2000 or ACE or whatever it’s called is to have both transformers and LSTM and while I am an old technophobe reading I did on Transformers confirmed an interplay between them and LSTM.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
I would like to be charitable but two things stick out for me in the post you see as reasonable.Read my post in context you FW. This is a possible alternative unless you have irrefutable proof otherwise.
But here's a start for you and all new investors who you've apparently taken under your wing: Revenue = sales = sales staff doing their jobs!
I agree, my thought in this was we've got close now to the OEM'S I suppose catching up. They've played around, now understand, made their products and now showing them off. Some have finished these steps and are ahead of the game, now the can start selling!!!I don't want to be waiting for years here. We need to see contracts signed and actual revenue - soon. At least enough to pay company expenses and be a 'going concern'.
YES, and thank you JB.