wilzy123
Founding Member
Of course no price movement of note, same as yesterday really... im nne
Of course no price movement of note, same as yesterday really... im nne
Totally agree with you " Toasty ". .......... I'm quite confident imo, that the "Big Fish" would have wanted some absolute guarantee from BRN, that they had all IP base's covered by patents, before they committed themselves to any formal contracts/royalty issues and for nothing to stand in their way concerning their own product development lines / Tech.The moat continues to grow.........this must surely ring alarm bells for other organisations attempting to develop SNN edge products?
I wonder if this transaction was a pre-requisite for some of the "household names" to sign up?
You hit the nail on the head @HopalongPetrovski, the entire world doesn’t understand the significance yet!!The market doesn't understand the significance....................Yet!
It will take time to filter through their tech people who will need to find a way to make it understandable to their finance strategists and acquisition boffins. Ongoing though they will see it as a further reinforcing of our competitive edge, particularly at the......
The market is lagging our foresight in this regard, and fortunately Brainchip has understood the necessity of having a solid financial/fat buffer to weather this period of relative famine.
We'll all be feasting soon enough.
Congratulations to our management team.
AKIDA BALLISTA
AKIDA EVERYWHERE
GLTAH
Not to mention what I say to devices by using Google assistant which I am finding very convenient. Bluetooth too is vulnerable I think."
That suggests our tech could be used for privacy in phones etc. We know that once the baddies have a small sample of a voice, they can create vocals that sound so much like you that they can fool speech recognition systems of banks, friends etc.
- US 11,429,857, “Secure Voice Communications System,” protects a system to establish secure voice communications between a local and a remote neural network device. Information is encrypted by transmitting spike timing rather than original data, rendering it useless to anyone intercepting the transmission."
That's a huge market, and having it protected by our patent makes me think $$$
TEC..... JAST wondering, what will eventuate with the s/price, should the upcoming 4C disclose another $4 mill plus revenue stream this time around.Hey Bravo,
I JAST wanted to say that you are another great contributor to our forum, it's very clear to me that you put in a tremendous amount of time researching all the articles that you post, so I personally thank you.
Some may JAST turn out to be distant dots, while others appear to be right on point.
The Shorter's days are numbered, they may think that they are winning this physiological battle, but the day will come when they have to buy back all these borrowed shares and that's the time when any educated Brainchip shareholder stands tall and say's "not mine sucker"
News flow to increase.
Tech x
You can lead horses to water.............You hit the nail on the head @HopalongPetrovski, the entire world doesn’t understand the significance yet!!
But fortunately, only a small percentage of the population need to fully understand. The rest of the world will be using products with embedded Akida in no next to no time, and they won‘t even know it. PANTENE!
Personally, I will find it quite hilarious when so many people need to throw away years, and decades, of effort trying to bodge together solutions in software and inadequate hardware, when they realise they just need to run their CNN model, and/or data, through BrainChip software to develop a working SNN solution in minutes.
Some will stick steadfastly to their inferior products. Some companies will go to the wall throwing oodles of cash at the old-school solutions. But inevitably, as night follows day, those who want a competitive solution will turn to Akida.
I patiently wait for that day.
I’ll be disappointed if it doesn’t. Why? Because the half yearly disclosed revenue accrued, not received. I’m hoping this coming quarter 4c actually shows the receipt of that revenue. So yes, we should see that revenue in this 4 c. I’ll be looking for additional to that.TEC..... JAST wondering, what will eventuate with the s/price, should the upcoming 4C disclose another $4 mill plus revenue stream this time around.
TEC..... JAST wondering, what will eventuate with the s/price, should the upcoming 4C disclose another $4 mill plus revenue stream this time around.
I smell military and law enforcement use here............"
That suggests our tech could be used for privacy in phones etc. We know that once the baddies have a small sample of a voice, they can create vocals that sound so much like you that they can fool speech recognition systems of banks, friends etc.
- US 11,429,857, “Secure Voice Communications System,” protects a system to establish secure voice communications between a local and a remote neural network device. Information is encrypted by transmitting spike timing rather than original data, rendering it useless to anyone intercepting the transmission."
That's a huge market, and having it protected by our patent makes me think $$$
This may be true.As a business that is new to commercialisation, I would think this wouldn't be a priority purchase unless we have cash flow coming in
This may be true.
However, I also think it speaks volumes to the importance that the company places on the JAST learning rules. Why risk derailing your commercial prospects knowing full well you remain at the mercy of a licensing agreement, when you can acquire it and move on with confidence. Now wouldn't that instil at lot of confidence in not only the company itself but also their customers.
I agree with this. I believe that the license has been available for BrainChip’s exclusive purchase for quite some time and would have remained so. BrainChip has chosen now to purchase it. That gives me a great deal of confidence.Looking carefully at the announcement, we could have kept the license as it was for the short term, but we have $250k to spend to acquire it outright for the long run. As a business that is new to commercialisation, I would think this wouldn't be a priority purchase unless we have cash flow coming in, so.... how long? About two weeks![]()
This may be true.
However, I also think it speaks volumes to the importance that the company places on the JAST learning rules. Why risk derailing your commercial prospects knowing full well you remain at the mercy of a licensing agreement, when you can acquire it and move on with confidence. Now wouldn't that instil at lot of confidence in not only the company itself but also their customers.