AVZ Discussion 2022

[tolate]

Yes i must agree ,waste of TIME waiting for AVZ to update their S H...imo
Yes lets update that INCREDIBLE waste of time...!...imo
Well done you MIGHT be back on TRACK...!...

 

[Doc]

 

[tolate]

 

[Doc]

 

[tolate]

DOCTOR Rat AT NIGHT CLASSES...imo

 

[tolate]

View attachment 91216
DOCTOR Rat AT NIGHT CLASSES...imo

atari-brokered peace talks between the Congolese government and M23 are reportedly deadlocked. French state media reported on September 4 that representatives from both sides have been in Doha for nearly three weeks but that no concrete progress has been made and the talks remain stalled over complex issues regarding the release of prisoners on both sides.

 

[Scratch]

Atari is now on topic I see. I assume you’re a fan of space invaders?

 

[PrincessPeaches]

Live footage of Toilet trying to hide the fact he is also Anchorman

 

[tolate]

We have the TROLLS BAND TOGETHER,,,back on track...imo

 

[tolate]

Sounds like AVZ dont even responded to their Share Holders...BY DANNY and AMOVATIO posts...imo

Danny, I did the same and have had no response in the last 3 business days. I was hoping the company would be putting out an update this week with several updates being required to President Trump this week on the progress of the Peace Deal.

 

[SilentOne]

Not sure if the latest ICSID update has been posted.

 

[Flight996]

Not sure if the latest ICSID update has been posted.

View attachment 91239

 

[tolate]

Not sure if the latest ICSID update has been posted.

View attachment 91239

SECURITY of COSTS
What costs, for NEW Applications.....
OR LAWYERS COSTS..!...imo
WHAT COSTS AVZ should update S H on this MATTER...imo

 

[tolate]

SECURITY of COSTS
What costs, for NEW Applications.....
OR LAWYERS COSTS..!...imo
WHAT COSTS AVZ should update S H on this MATTER...imo

""""Security for costs"""""" is an order from a court requiring a party, usually the plaintiff, to pay a sum of money into court or provide a guarantee to cover the other party's legal costs if the first party loses the case. The purpose is to protect the defendant from being unable to recover their costs from an impecunious or non-resident plaintiff. This is a discretionary order, meaning the court decides whether to grant it based on specific factors, such as the plaintiff's financial circumstances and the merits of the case.

 

[tolate]

""""Security for costs"""""" is an order from a court requiring a party, usually the plaintiff, to pay a sum of money into court or provide a guarantee to cover the other party's legal costs if the first party loses the case. The purpose is to protect the defendant from being unable to recover their costs from an impecunious or non-resident plaintiff. This is a discretionary order, meaning the court decides whether to grant it based on specific factors, such as the plaintiff's financial circumstances and the merits of the case.

Consequences of an order
If a party fails to provide the security for costs within the specified timeframe, the court can take action, such as:

• Staying the proceedings: The case will be halted or paused until the security is provided.

 

[tolate]

An inside view of @tolate's brain

View attachment 91241

I BET you would like to KNOW, what is in NIGEL Brain ATM...LMAO
Please stick to the SCRIPT if your Brain allows you TO...imo..

 

[tolate]

Can you do some research for in here and report back please - has Zijin paid our legal fees that were awarded after all those cases at ICC that they LOST? If not, why not? I thought they had cash on hand?

Maybe when you attend your NIGHT CLASSES next, you can ask them before RATS come out...imo
Maybe they are waiting for MAGA
Maybe they will not PAY, as the DRC has refused to GRANT AVZ a M L...imo...
WHY hasn't the ICC made them to PAY, is a better QUESTION...imo

 

[tolate]

Maybe when you attend your NIGHT CLASSES next, you can ask them before RATS come out...imo
Maybe they are waiting for MAGA
Maybe they will not PAY, as the DRC has refused to GRANT AVZ a M L...imo...
WHY hasn't the ICC made them to PAY, is a better QUESTION...imo

""""'Security for costs"""""" is an interim measure that allows an applicant (usually the respondent) to secure an amount representing its arbitration costs, namely the legal costs, the tribunal’s fees, administrative costs etc. This measure is grounded on the principle of law recognized in most jurisdictions, which provides that an unsuccessful party in the legal proceedings is obliged to reimburse such costs to the successful party.

 

[tolate]

WHO IS BACK...LMAO

 

[Remark]

It's got to be difficult for @tolate here with no moderators to cry to.

People here can call she/he/it out for being a fucking moron who can't string a sentence together & there's nothing she/he/it can do.

All she/he/it can do is post the same regurgitated nonsense that he dribbles continuously on HC. She/he/it only recently discovered how to copy and paste other people's comments.

She/he/it only recently discovered how to post images here although I doubt she/he/it can work out how to post a GIF.

Poor simple Tolate.