A picture says a thousand words
And this guy in the background just being like "OMG you fking amateur, can you at least put the snacks bag inside one of the folders and not just walk around with it sitting ON TOP of the pile!"
You AI experts out there will no doubt find this funny, but for aspiring AI novices ... here is a trap to be aware of.
My question to Copilot ...
Because the following statement that you provided is in double quotes, I assumed that it is an actual full statement from a source that you found and listed. But it now appears that the statement with double quotes is the result of AI synthesizing. Is this last point of mine correct?
āWithin two weeks of signing, the parties shall appoint a three-member independent valuation panelāone nominated by AVZ, one by KoBold, and one mutually agreed expert. The panel shall issue a fair-market valuation of AVZās relinquished interests in permit PR 13359, including verified sunk costs and strategic upside, to guide the compensation package.ā
The Copilot answer ...
Youāre correct. That exact, fully-quoted passage isnāt lifted verbatim from any publicly accessible documentāitās an AI-generated synthesis based on private summaries (e.g. AVZās internal Q&A memo excerpts and confidential arbitration newsletters). I apologize for presenting it in quotes without making that clear.
My next question ...
In the future if a statement is not lifted verbatim from a publicly accessible document, can you not enclose the statement in double quotes?
The Copilot answer ...
Absolutely. Going forward, Iāll reserve double quotes for verbatim excerpts from publicly accessible sources. Any AI-generated summaries or paraphrases will be presented without quotation marks and clearly labeled as such. Let me know if youād like any other formatting adjustments.
Fuck !!!! You are back !!!!Things change ...imo
Fuck off dog shitThings change ...imo
|
They sure do. For example you used to think Dathomir still owned the 15% because you have zero understanding of contract law. Now you know that is complete bullshit LMAOThings change ...imo
Your AI did ok by me mate. I thought the 3 member panel thing was smelly but I wouldn't have thought of any escrow accounts or time bonuses, which makes perfect sense.You AI experts out there will no doubt find this funny, but for aspiring AI novices ... here is a trap to be aware of.
My question to Copilot ...
Because the following statement that you provided is in double quotes, I assumed that it is an actual full statement from a source that you found and listed. But it now appears that the statement with double quotes is the result of AI synthesizing. Is this last point of mine correct?
āWithin two weeks of signing, the parties shall appoint a three-member independent valuation panelāone nominated by AVZ, one by KoBold, and one mutually agreed expert. The panel shall issue a fair-market valuation of AVZās relinquished interests in permit PR 13359, including verified sunk costs and strategic upside, to guide the compensation package.ā
The Copilot answer ...
Youāre correct. That exact, fully-quoted passage isnāt lifted verbatim from any publicly accessible documentāitās an AI-generated synthesis based on private summaries (e.g. AVZās internal Q&A memo excerpts and confidential arbitration newsletters). I apologize for presenting it in quotes without making that clear.
My next question ...
In the future if a statement is not lifted verbatim from a publicly accessible document, can you not enclose the statement in double quotes?
The Copilot answer ...
Absolutely. Going forward, Iāll reserve double quotes for verbatim excerpts from publicly accessible sources. Any AI-generated summaries or paraphrases will be presented without quotation marks and clearly labeled as such. Let me know if youād like any other formatting adjustments.
Mate,Iāve been thinking about what CATH could do in the current situation.
I didn't forget that they voted against AVZ board, but business is business.
We are all so focused on how much we might get paid to drop the ICSID case, but what about the reverse? What if we get paid to keep ICSID open? With the āminerals for securityā deal soon to be signed, itās looking like Roche Dure can only go to an American company and KoBold seems to be the chosen one. So, if I were Mr. Pei from CATH, what would I do?
What if CATH offers to AVZ more money than KoBoldāwith the condition that ICSID continues until CATHās interests are fully secured? How would that for CATH be any different from AVZās current position? Itās notāexcept CATH would have around $6 billion USD lessWeād get paid by CATH, but keep pushing ICSID until CATH is satisfied. And with that money in our pockets, Nigel could finally relax on a beach while CATH and legal team go a few rounds with the Americans. CATHās conditions might be something like:
1. If the mining licence is granted, AVZ sells the project to CATH for $1.
2. If CATH reaches a satisfactory agreement with the Americans, ICSID is dropped.
Mr. Pei could throw in a few more clauses, of course. The point isāKoBold hasnāt resolved the disputes and is actually operating in defiance of ICSID. This move could block the Americans while DRC still has the ICSID case hanging over its head, along with the risk of being exposed. Can a U.S. company really work with a government officially found guilty of corruption? Weāre no longer selling a projectāweāre potentially getting paid to drop ICSID. That says everything about how much of a problem it is for the DRC government and any American company trying to move into Manono. Something tells me CATH isnāt going to walk away quietly if their interests are sidelined. Maybe I should send Mr. Pei an emailI havenāt ordered Chinese food since this whole suspension saga began, but if we finally get what we deserveāI just might. Of course, the best outcome is KoBold paying a fair price. I just canāt help but imagining a scenario where some of us are on a beach, millionaires at last, while CATH, KoBold, the DRC government, and ZIJIN are fighting at ICSID. Now that would be a nice end to this horror story and definitely worthy of a movie.
You might find it funny, but I find it a fucking disgusting slur on everything AVZOff topic but a bit tongue in cheek for a Friday funnyā¦
Anyone else in RNU? Progressing nicely. Has a couple of benefits compared to AVZā¦..
- Not in DRC
- Sheep as neighbours not Chinese with brown paper snack bags
- CEO is allowed in same country as asset
- Listed and trading on the ASX
- Doesnāt have multiple legal battles underway
- Australian government is actually interested in supporting
Thatās a good start, but they also have some graphite and maybe even uranium and copper![]()
I don't think you understood my post. There is $6 billion USD mentioned in my post, but anyway, I am just exploring options available to CATH, so we are not left only with KoBoldās offer. Maybe you were just sarcastic?Mate,
Whats wrong with you - AVZ is not going to be selling the Project for $1 (in my opinion)- stop low balling.
What you are suggesting is a poor outcome for those that bought in at the higher end.
Regards,
SilentOne.