Just spitballing more about how this is all going to play out.
Remember when we were going to get an SEZ?
I wonder if something similar will be part of the deal for Kobold and Ko. By buying out AVZ, they would essentially be covering the DRC's future debt from ICSID penalties. DRC partly offsets the cost through tax-breaks. This could only be justified as part of a bigger investment and development proposal, which is exactly what Yankees are proposing.
I am all for taxes being paid to DRC *if it goes towards improving life for citizens there* so I am totally fine with a short-term tax break to establish a long-term framework for development.
So
- tax breaks from DRC to mitigate their medium term losses in penalties,
- scrip or royalties as part of the buyout offer,
....shapes a deal from both ends where buyers can afford to offer shareholders what they deserve.
Remember when we were going to get an SEZ?
I wonder if something similar will be part of the deal for Kobold and Ko. By buying out AVZ, they would essentially be covering the DRC's future debt from ICSID penalties. DRC partly offsets the cost through tax-breaks. This could only be justified as part of a bigger investment and development proposal, which is exactly what Yankees are proposing.
I am all for taxes being paid to DRC *if it goes towards improving life for citizens there* so I am totally fine with a short-term tax break to establish a long-term framework for development.
So
- tax breaks from DRC to mitigate their medium term losses in penalties,
- scrip or royalties as part of the buyout offer,
....shapes a deal from both ends where buyers can afford to offer shareholders what they deserve.