DRC-US Deal: "I will never sell out the DRC's wealth"
Head of State Félix Tshisekedi took the opportunity on Monday, May 5, 2025, during the ceremony celebrating International Press Freedom Day held at the Hôtel du Rivière in Kinshasa, to denounce the misinterpretation by certain media outlets of the deal involving strategic minerals in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.
For him, these interpretations are unfounded and are part of orchestrated campaigns to weaken the country's economic sovereignty and undermine its strategic repositioning efforts.
“I cannot ignore the numerous media manipulations surrounding a strategic partnership currently being finalized between the Democratic Republic of Congo and the United States of America, concerning the development of our critical minerals.
Some statements, sometimes relayed without verification by some sections of the press, wrongly refer to an alleged sell-off of our natural resources.
These self-denials are naturally unfounded, but often stem from orchestrated campaigns to weaken our economic sovereignty and undermine our country's efforts to strategically reposition itself on the world stage,” declared Félix Tshisekedi.
*Currently being finalized
View attachment 83846
That's really going to upset Felix - haven't you read Jens' postsRe: “I cannot ignore the numerous media manipulations surrounding a strategic partnership currently being finalized between the Democratic Republic of Congo and the United States of America, concerning the development of our critical minerals.
Some statements, sometimes relayed without verification by some sections of the press, wrongly refer to an alleged sell-off of our natural resources.
These self-denials are naturally unfounded..."Let me state categorically that anything worthwhile has already been expropriated and flogged off to the Chinese at bargain basement prices, and only when the appropriate bribes have been paid. This is what the citizens of our once-great country expect, and this is what we will deliver for them".
This is the key here imo, we need the ruling against DRC to ensure the Americans have to play fair.Then finally, what else is true is ISCID deliberations coming real soon and as we all know, AVZ holds all the cards there too, so one has to conclude that there should be a end point to this miserey some time this year in our favour on a probability scale.
It's not FridayThat's really going to upset Felix - haven't you read Jens' posts![]()
So what do make of the "appropriately compensated" statement ? Or the $1.5Bill + Royalties leak? Does the US/West already have enough info to know how the ICSID will pan out ? Would DLA Piper brief them on case details ? Is the ICSID time frame and subsequent Valuation worth the the journey ? Would AVZ's Court victories so far, along with the DRC's attempts to avoid the ICSID (unpaid fees /objection to Jurisdiction) be noted ? Add to all that the DRC Ministers/Officials /Presidents being exposed ? I have my doubts the US/DRC need to wait for an ICSID verdict . IMOThis is the key here imo, we need the ruling against DRC to ensure the Americans have to play fair.
My feeling is that DRC are waiting to see if they can get out of the ICSID case, the Americans are waiting to see if it goes in our favour and to what extent. Otherwise they'll probably shaft us just as easily as the Chinese.
If there is a deal in the meantime good, but I'm not holding my breath.
Also a friend shared these wise words with me:
View attachment 83869
After all my years in business , construction , hotels , motels , ANY and ALL disputes are sorted on the courthouse steps at the last second , because it's still business till then , lets see what what happens over the following weeks .So what do make of the "appropriately compensated" statement ? Or the $1.5Bill + Royalties leak? Does the US/West already have enough info to know how the ICSID will pan out ? Would DLA Piper brief them on case details ? Is the ICSID time frame and subsequent Valuation worth the the journey ? Would AVZ's Court victories so far, along with the DRC's attempts to avoid the ICSID (unpaid fees /objection to Jurisdiction) be noted ? Add to all that the DRC Ministers/Officials /Presidents being exposed ? I have my doubts the US/DRC need to wait for an ICSID verdict . IMO
"ALL disputes are sorted on the courthouse steps at the last second"After all my years in business , construction , hotels , motels , ANY and ALL disputes are sorted on the courthouse steps at the last second , because it's still business till then , lets see what what happens over the following weeks .
It's out of our hands all we can do is trust our BOD to bring this home , you know where I live , Chindos , nobody here trusts them"ALL disputes are sorted on the courthouse steps at the last second"
Times 100 for the Chinese, every time.
$2? Is jcar trying to soften up us holders for one last rogering?
I think since the purported low ball offer got rejected they will wait and see what appropriate compensation means and then potentially offer something more substantial.So what do make of the "appropriately compensated" statement ? Or the $1.5Bill + Royalties leak? Does the US/West already have enough info to know how the ICSID will pan out ? Would DLA Piper brief them on case details ? Is the ICSID time frame and subsequent Valuation worth the the journey ? Would AVZ's Court victories so far, along with the DRC's attempts to avoid the ICSID (unpaid fees /objection to Jurisdiction) be noted ? Add to all that the DRC Ministers/Officials /Presidents being exposed ? I have my doubts the US/DRC need to wait for an ICSID verdict . IMO
After all my years in business , construction , hotels , motels , ANY and ALL disputes are sorted on the courthouse steps at the last second , because it's still business till then , lets see what what happens over the following weeks .
I could be missing some reference or joke here, if so, sucks to be me...$2? Is jcar trying to soften up us holders for one last rogering?
I could be missing some reference or joke here, if so, sucks to be me...
but perhaps some investors have been misled as to what kind of compensation or sale price we might end up with.
When I think of the calls for $12 and so on, I know it's being said with bravado... but perhaps other investors have been believing these claims to have some merit.
My ear isn't as close to the ground as some, but I doubt we will get even $2.
I think we will be fortunate if it's above $1, and even then still not getting a CGT discount, nor a cost base tax reduction.
It's completely pointless to quote what Manono is worth, when demanding what we should get paid.
Shareholders should be aware of one thing only when it comes to any sort of payout.
And that thing is simply... What can we get for it?
A thing is only valued at what anyone is willing to pay for it.
And while ISCID is on our side, to go full nut down that avenue means years of turmoil and expense, for a completely unknown payout likely 10 years from now. if at all
There is no bravado or leverage in claiming "FULL VALUE OR FULL ISCID ROUTE!!! [FLEX]"
Going full ISCID is a fucking disaster.
I fully trust the BOD to deliver the best value we can possibly get, whether that's a few cents per share, or a few dollars per share.
These claims of "$X or else FULL ISCID" are pure fantasy.
I don't mean to burst anyones bubble, truly I don't.
I just want everyone to be realistic.
*IMHO*
Do you mean like.. lets pretend we wont back down unless we get $12?FFS Azz....
Really????
I could be missing some reference or joke here, if so, sucks to be me...
but perhaps some investors have been misled as to what kind of compensation or sale price we might end up with.
When I think of the calls for $12 and so on, I know it's being said with bravado... but perhaps other investors have been believing these claims to have some merit.
My ear isn't as close to the ground as some, but I doubt we will get even $2.
I think we will be fortunate if it's above $1, and even then still not getting a CGT discount, nor a cost base tax reduction.
It's completely pointless to quote what Manono is worth, when demanding what we should get paid.
Shareholders should be aware of one thing only when it comes to any sort of payout.
And that thing is simply... What can we get for it?
A thing is only valued at what anyone is willing to pay for it.
And while ISCID is on our side, to go full nut down that avenue means years of turmoil and expense, for a completely unknown payout likely 10 years from now. if at all
There is no bravado or leverage in claiming "FULL VALUE OR FULL ISCID ROUTE!!! [FLEX]"
Going full ISCID is a fucking disaster.
I fully trust the BOD to deliver the best value we can possibly get, whether that's a few cents per share, or a few dollars per share.
These claims of "$X or else FULL ISCID" are pure fantasy.
I don't mean to burst anyones bubble, truly I don't.
I just want everyone to be realistic.
*IMHO*