Carlos Danger
Top 20
Hasn't it already been established that COMINIERE's request for financing detail within 90 days is a load of bullshit and does not give them rights to terminate?
@Carlos Danger enter stage left
Anyway, as is usual in the DRC, this is not new news, it relates to events that happened months ago, and is just getting regurgitated for entertainment purposes. I see cuntLars has gone into hysteria over it on X
Here's Article 18.3 that CKK is citing to terminate the JVAI’m also interested in this.
I have a vague recollection of the request being interpreted by AVZ as a nefarious means for Cominier to obtain important commercial info help inform their attack on us along with their corrupt buddies (cough #Fuckzijin).
AVZ has seemingly done everything by the letter of the law and by the contract. It would truely suck if there was a minor technical breach that was being overblown by Cominere into a reason for dissolution.
Here's Article 11 that 18.3 references
Here are Articles 19 and 20.8 that talk about requirements of producing documents
I haven't been able to find anything specifically about a 90 day window for producing financial records but Cominiere are most likely trying to use one of these rules as justification for the termination of the JVA
Article 19.1 includes a line about parties not being required to produce documents if it may 'affect the security and/or efficiency of the operations of Dathcom'. It's possible management are using this as their reasoning for why they didn't have to give Cominiere the financial records.
But considering everything about how we are financing this is on public record anyway through official announcements it seems a bit weird to me that management wouldn't have just complied with the request. Regardless of why AVZ didn't provide the documents Article 11 clearly states that only the ICC can settle disputes within the JVA. Not some back alley brown paper bag courts in the DRC.