As annoying as it is, I don't think that it is a violation given that the website isn't direct representation of what is legally accurate, as mentioned in the site disclaimer. Happy (and wishing) to stand corrected though.So what is it guys? Are we calling it their first violation? I need to know for the new counter.
Surely if true the IGF report is not been taken seriously by Cominiere .As annoying as it is, I don't think that it is a violation given that the website isn't direct representation of what is legally accurate, as mentioned in the site disclaimer. Happy (and wishing) to stand corrected though.
Don't think you need to say first. Just 'Violation of ICC Emergency Arbitration order' would be okay. But it's up to you as either way works.So what is it guys? Are we calling it their first violation? I need to know for the new counter.
Getting CAMI to update their website constitutes 'taking any action or taking any steps that would result from the implementation of the termination of the Dathcom JVA and / or the consequences of such termination' imo@Spikerama
No violation. Even if what CAMI site says was correct, (AND I'M NOT SAYING IT IS) it doesn't mean the Dathcom JV is dissolved. It would simply mean COMINIERE has been granted the tenement, having been taken off DATHCOM. Dissolving the JV is a separate issue, and carries a cost of 50k a day
In normal circumstances, a MoM decree would be needed to withdraw DATHCOM rights to the tenement (if actually legally able to be done), followed by CAMI updating the Cadastre. Haven't seen one of those yet, and she has swanned off to Turkey to talk turkey
IMO
Kunt
Yep have to agree here. the JV agreement relates to the shareholders of Dathcom and how the 100% of the shares in Dathcom are owned and distributed. The tenement which Dathcom has been granted is the asset or business that the shareholders are investing in when buying shares in Dathcom. Iam also calling bullshit on Celestine. that guy is as i have said before a dead man walking@Spikerama
No violation. Even if what CAMI site says was correct, (AND I'M NOT SAYING IT IS) it doesn't mean the Dathcom JV is dissolved. It would simply mean COMINIERE has been granted the tenement, having been taken off DATHCOM. Dissolving the JV is a separate issue, and carries a cost of 50k a day
In normal circumstances, a MoM decree would be needed to withdraw DATHCOM rights to the tenement (if actually legally able to be done), followed by CAMI updating the Cadastre. Haven't seen one of those yet, and she has swanned off to Turkey to talk turkey
On reflection, all this sounds ridiculous, and couldn't possibly happen, without massive repercussions for the DRC, in all sorts of ways
So I call it fucking bullshit Celestine
IMO
Kunt
Probably not. The ICC order was against Cominiere. Celeste is from CAMI.So what is it guys? Are we calling it their first violation? I need to know for the new counter.
Getting CAMI to update their website constitutes 'taking any action or taking any steps that would result from the implementation of the termination of the Dathcom JVA and / or the consequences of such termination' imo
But it is probably wise to wait until we hear something official from the company about the fine being in play before launching the counter
Have they ever released an announcement regarding changes on the CAMI site?Managed to get through to the AVZ team. I only spoke to the admin lady however was advised they are aware of change on the cami website and will release an ann shortly.
No real indication so hopefully just a matter of more pathetic games.
Ok well it's ready to go at first sight of anymore bullshit.
Hi Spike, I meant to send you this ages ago. If you have some capacity and inclination to continue the attack on our friends at Zijin here are some ideas.Peeps, I'm working on a new counter.
So are we saying that the removal of Dathcom is the first violation of ICCs Emergency Arbitration order?
My understanding is that CAMI do not have jurisdiction or authority to do such a thing. They manage the cadastral records and portal, and manage surface fees.The show might be over for us.
If there is no support from CAMI, then there is no support from the Gouvernement
Once more AVZ should be surprised
Time to fuck off yet hey Pete? Or is it Peute?The show might be over for us.
If there is no support from CAMI, then there is no support from the Gouvernement
Once more AVZ should be surprised
Peter Clark? The name is a little obvious don't you think ? Better than John Smith .The show might be over for us.
If there is no support from CAMI, then there is no support from the Gouvernement
Once more AVZ should be surprised
Probably not. The ICC order was against Cominiere. Celeste is from CAMI.