Winenut
Go AVZ!
What?Think about it this way , within the next 4 to 6 weeks you are going to know if you've done your doe or not . IMO
Rooted a deer???
What?Think about it this way , within the next 4 to 6 weeks you are going to know if you've done your doe or not . IMO
Best thing I’ve read on here in weeks aaah farkWhat?
Rooted a deer???
Market: fall in the prices of the main minerals exported by the DRCAny Chinese company linked to the CCP is corrupt, immoral and have no ethics. They are also thieves who prey on the vunerable and don't give a damn about the countries they operate in.
These numbers make me happy. If.only.someone.would.grant.the.fucking.mining.lease…
Edit: This 9% to CATH thing seems to come up a bit. Something to it?
it's a rough translation.Two things:
1. What a steaming pile of rancid word-salad this is:
“They are willing to take effective measures to further develop mutually beneficial and win-win cooperation, to make a tangible and tangible contribution to economic development and to improving the business climate of the DRC.”
What effective measures? Quitting their graft and corruption? Paying their dues? Obeying the law?
2. I notice that they don’t address the substance of the accusations and offer only platitudes and vaguely threatening words.
What a bunch of arseholes.
Nigel mentioned at the roadshows that CATH would be willing to go down to 9% saying they're more concerned with getting product than ownership.
Email AVZ and ask Ferguson.I've been checking MarketWatch occasionally to monitor AJN share price. It seems that it's recently changed within the last week from being a publicly-listed company to a private company. Any thoughts?
My first thoughts were:
1. Maybe MarketWatch got it wrong.
2. It's easier for AJN to hide misbehaviours being a private company.
3. How does this affect their proposed JV with DRC to form Congo Ressources now that the company structure has changed? Or are there factors/issues with the proposed JV or legal issues with some of their execs/directors necessitating the change in company structure?
IMO DYOR
Go to the AJN web page and click on Investors and then Stock Price….it takes you to the CSE listing page. It is still public listed and it’s status is Active. Must be a glitch on your MarketWatch page.I've been checking MarketWatch occasionally to monitor AJN share price. It seems that it's recently changed within the last week from being a publicly-listed company to a private company. Any thoughts?
My first thoughts were:
1. Maybe MarketWatch got it wrong.
2. It's easier for AJN to hide misbehaviours being a private company.
3. How does this affect their proposed JV with DRC to form Congo Ressources now that the company structure has changed? Or are there factors/issues with the proposed JV or legal issues with some of their execs/directors necessitating the change in company structure?
IMO DYOR
Still on the CSE as far as the CSE website showsI've been checking MarketWatch occasionally to monitor AJN share price. It seems that it's recently changed within the last week from being a publicly-listed company to a private company. Any thoughts?
My first thoughts were:
1. Maybe MarketWatch got it wrong.
2. It's easier for AJN to hide misbehaviours being a private company.
3. How does this affect their proposed JV with DRC to form Congo Ressources now that the company structure has changed? Or are there factors/issues with the proposed JV or legal issues with some of their execs/directors necessitating the change in company structure?
IMO DYOR
I'm not so sure of that. We haven't heard ICC hearing confirmed for any date in April, and in any case it's likely just going to be another procedural hearing with the case probably to be heard down the line. ICC be slooow. I know there's a chance of talking happening in the lead up to ICC if this was just a pressure move by Zijin and they don't wish the case to actually go forward, leading to some sort of negotiated settlement or the Chinese making a more concerted grab through their DRC proxy pressure campaign, but there's likely to still be a fair amount of time to act on that before any ICC embarrassment is envisaged. IMO anyway, I'm hoping your right and we won't even get to the case. (As long as that trends towards a positive outcome at least, lolz.)Think about it this way , within the next 4 to 6 weeks you are going to know if you've done your doe or not . IMO
I'm hopeful of a resolution before it gets to the ICC . Nigel knows time and money are not on our side .There is also the chance that if something cannot be sorted the MoM will pull it completely (In The Nation's Best Interest ). I think if all the cards were going to fall in our favour it would have happened by now . IMOI'm not so sure of that. We haven't heard ICC hearing confirmed for any date in April, and in any case it's likely just going to be another procedural hearing with the case probably to be heard down the line. ICC be slooow. I know there's a chance of talking happening in the lead up to ICC if this was just a pressure move by Zijin and they don't wish the case to actually go forward, leading to some sort of negotiated settlement or the Chinese making a more concerted grab through their DRC proxy pressure campaign, but there's likely to still be a fair amount of time to act on that before any ICC embarrassment is envisaged. IMO anyway, I'm hoping your right and we won't even get to the case. (As long as that trends towards a positive outcome at least, lolz.)
I think Nigel said CATH could go to 9% so long as they were guaranteed at least 50% of production but then again Nigel said a lot of things ...........Nigel mentioned at the roadshows that CATH would be willing to go down to 9% saying they're more concerned with getting product than ownership.
If this isn't resolved before the ICC hearing this will drag out for another 6 months. Once it hits court/arbitration it will get bogged down. I'm hoping something happens beforehand.I'm hopeful of a resolution before it gets to the ICC . Nigel knows time and money are not on our side .There is also the chance that if something cannot be sorted the MoM will pull it completely (In The Nations Best Interest ). I think if all the cards were going to fall in our favour it would have happened by now . IMO
Couldn't agree more with you Bags, he is a whinging, wining, negative naysayer. I sometimes wonder what he is trying to achieve???@Sammael and @Winenut
CATH are substantial holders in Lithium Plus who have continued accumulating shares so they are still getting the benefits from increased ownership
@wombat74 you were complaining last year about @Nellie17 and @The Fox speculating on good news, and at the same time all you ever do is speculate on bad news.
Apart from that you never actually do any research and you always have an answer back so I figure the only way to not have to listen to your bullshit any longer is to put you on ignore
…. Thank fuck for that