BRN Discussion Ongoing

[dippY22]

I for one am sick of bot predictions. The world and its human inhabitants are becomming lazy as a result of them. Bot responses are no different than rifling through a big file cabinet to come up with the answer(s). As a human I would much prefer to engage with another human who uses their noggin to craft an argument, or to debate a topic. Since bots only look backward how could they possibly predict the future for Brainchip. They can't and none of us can. Why not engage a seer, or a witch doctor for predictions? Or, the magic 8 ball?

Personally, I believe Brainchip has a bright future which is why I remain invested. No chat bot will convince me that what they know is better than what I know.

The bots are great for a lot of things, like, ....tell me what the top ten US states are for number of golf courses,...or, what is the worst ranked state for golf course to population density ..... etc

Anyway, keep on using the bot responses and I'll keep on taking them in with the proverbial grain of salt. Regards, dippY

 

[Diogenese]

I for one am sick of bot predictions. The world and its human inhabitants are becomming lazy as a result of them. Bot responses are no different than rifling through a big file cabinet to come up with the answer(s). As a human I would much prefer to engage with another human who uses their noggin to craft an argument, or to debate a topic. Since bots only look backward how could they possibly predict the future for Brainchip. They can't and none of us can. Why not engage a seer, or a witch doctor for predictions? Or, the magic 8 ball?

Personally, I believe Brainchip has a bright future which is why I remain invested. No chat bot will convince me that what they know is better than what I know.

The bots are great for a lot of things, like, ....tell me what the top ten US states are for number of golf courses,...or, what is the worst ranked state for golf course to population density ..... etc

Anyway, keep on using the bot responses and I'll keep on taking them in with the proverbial grain of salt. Regards, dippY

Past results are no guarantee of future performance.

 

[smoothsailing18]

FF

AiLabs a Brainchip partner has upgraded their website since last I took a look.
The following link takes you to 'News". They only have two news items and both relate to Brainchip.
The first one will be well known to genuine shareholders and investors but I had not seen the second which has involved quite a bit of work to present
by AiLabs:

https://ailabsinc.com/news-event/details2

 

[Jacob Kiraz]

Some staff may have officially retired, but old habits die hard, I know of two former staffers who work for free, why, because they have the sort of personalities that don't revolve around greed, and I for one feel blessed that they both care about helping Brainchip achieve everyones dream.

Integrity remains a central focal point of our company, be grateful, rather than selfish, it's never been all about you, it's always been all about Akida

Do these 2 gentlemen still own a shipload of shares

 

[Rskiff]

FF

from 2023, so we are eagerly awaiting the mass adoption

 

[Fullmoonfever]

I for one am sick of bot predictions. The world and its human inhabitants are becomming lazy as a result of them. Bot responses are no different than rifling through a big file cabinet to come up with the answer(s). As a human I would much prefer to engage with another human who uses their noggin to craft an argument, or to debate a topic. Since bots only look backward how could they possibly predict the future for Brainchip. They can't and none of us can. Why not engage a seer, or a witch doctor for predictions? Or, the magic 8 ball?

Personally, I believe Brainchip has a bright future which is why I remain invested. No chat bot will convince me that what they know is better than what I know.

The bots are great for a lot of things, like, ....tell me what the top ten US states are for number of golf courses,...or, what is the worst ranked state for golf course to population density ..... etc

Anyway, keep on using the bot responses and I'll keep on taking them in with the proverbial grain of salt. Regards, dippY

 

[Space Cadet]

I think your AI was dreaming with the SOI.......

Yes the Southern Oscillation Index has moved to La Nina

SC

 

[Bravo]

I for one am sick of bot predictions. The world and its human inhabitants are becomming lazy as a result of them. Bot responses are no different than rifling through a big file cabinet to come up with the answer(s). As a human I would much prefer to engage with another human who uses their noggin to craft an argument, or to debate a topic. Since bots only look backward how could they possibly predict the future for Brainchip. They can't and none of us can. Why not engage a seer, or a witch doctor for predictions? Or, the magic 8 ball?

Personally, I believe Brainchip has a bright future which is why I remain invested. No chat bot will convince me that what they know is better than what I know.

The bots are great for a lot of things, like, ....tell me what the top ten US states are for number of golf courses,...or, what is the worst ranked state for golf course to population density ..... etc

Anyway, keep on using the bot responses and I'll keep on taking them in with the proverbial grain of salt. Regards, dippY

Hi Dippy,

I agree with you that nobody, whether human or AI, can predict BrainChip’s future with certainty.

As I said in my post, it’s a ChatGPT generated valuation and because of that it’s probably not worth the paper it’s written on.

My point was not to outsource my thinking to a bot, but rather to use it deliberately to illustrate a difference in valuation frameworks, in response to a discussion suggesting a $20 billion acquisition at this point in time, which, in my view, is simply unrealistic given where the company is today.

Like you, I have faith in BrainChip's future success. That’s why I remain invested and (as others have stated) I’ll go down with the ship if I have to (although I’d much prefer to be on the deck sipping a pina colada).

You can attack the tool if you want, but I think it's harder to dismiss the argument it helped to frame which is that an acquisition price today usually reflects current reality plus a premium and true blue-sky valuations usually require a forcing event.

So, the takeaway for me wasn’t “this valuation is correct", rather it was that the logic highlights something pretty obvious (at least in my mind) which is that we need to sell licences and generate revenue before getting too far ahead of ourselves. For an acquisition to deliver an attractive outcome for shareholders, the company needs time to establish itself commercially and demonstrate sales traction. Until licences and revenue materially show up, any acquirer will heavily discount that future.

I use ChatGPT a lot in my line of work and I personally find it incredibly valuable. But, like any tool, it has strengths and limitations. In any case, I believe it served its purpose in this instance because it helped spark what I think is a valuable discussion and brought some different perspectives to the surface.

Regards,

B

 

[smoothsailing18]

Bravo... I think there maybe some confusion to the 20 billion mentioned. It from my understanding was an example to what the share price would be rather than a possibility of acquisition now at 20 billion. That's my take on what was posted originally on crapper.
Anyway from that we / I was able to get share prices from the 20 billion back down to the current 300 plus million, which is good for myself to understand the valuation comparison to share price.

Brainchips fuse has been lite and 2026 it explodes, imo

 

[7für7]

Hi Dippy,

I agree with you that nobody, whether human or AI, can predict BrainChip’s future with certainty.

As I said in my post, it’s a ChatGPT generated valuation and because of that it’s probably not worth the paper it’s written on.

My point was not to outsource my thinking to a bot, but rather to use it deliberately to illustrate a difference in valuation frameworks, in response to a discussion suggesting a $20 billion acquisition at this point in time, which, in my view, is simply unrealistic given where the company is today.

Like you, I have faith in BrainChip's future success. That’s why I remain invested and (as others have stated) I’ll go down with the ship if I have to (although I’d much prefer to be on the deck sipping a pina colada).

You can attack the tool if you want, but I think it's harder to dismiss the argument it helped to frame which is that an acquisition price today usually reflects current reality plus a premium and true blue-sky valuations usually require a forcing event.

So, the takeaway for me wasn’t “this valuation is correct", rather it was that the logic highlights something pretty obvious (at least in my mind) which is that we need to sell licences and generate revenue before getting too far ahead of ourselves. For an acquisition to deliver an attractive outcome for shareholders, the company needs time to establish itself commercially and demonstrate sales traction. Until licences and revenue materially show up, any acquirer will heavily discount that future.

I use ChatGPT a lot in my line of work and I personally find it incredibly valuable. But, like any tool, it has strengths and limitations. In any case, I believe it served its purpose in this instance because it helped spark what I think is a valuable discussion and brought some different perspectives to the surface.

Regards,

B

 

[Pom down under]

Well they better hurry up and make me rich as I could do with some more of this

 

[7für7]

I know it doesn’t have to mean something… but it’s nice to see LOL Germany opening

 

[Rach2512]

#bnew2026 #neuromorphicengineering #neuronics_lab #iisc #bangalore #innovation #neuromorphicintegratedcircuits #braininspiredcomputing #eventbasedsensing #braincomputerinterfaces | Bangalore Neuromorphic Engineering Workshop

🎤 Speaker Spotlight — BNEW 2026 Here’s a peek at the next set of speakers you’ll hear at the Bangalore Neuromorphic Engineering Workshop (BNEW) 2026. Announcing: 🧠 Rajesh P. N. Rao — University of Washington, USA 🧠 Amir Zjajo, — Innatera 🧠 Ashesh Dhawale — Indian Institute of Science (IISc)...

www.linkedin.com

 

[Rach2512]

BrainChip Discusses Brain-Inspired Systems with Dr. Jason Eshraghian

BrainChip and Fulbright Fellow Jason Eshraghian discuss brain-inspired systems, exploring neuromorphic computing and the evolution of next-gen intelligent AI.

brainchip.com

#ieee #cass #neuromorphiccomputing #adaptivecognition #callforpapers #computermagazine | Abderazek Ben Abdallah

***Happy (Almost) New Year!*** As we get ready to welcome 2026, I’m sharing again the Call for Papers for our IEEE Computer Magazine Special Issue on Convergence of Neuromorphic and Adaptive Cognition. Good news for all last‑minute sprinters: The new submission deadline is January 1st, 2026...

www.linkedin.com

 

[Rach2512]

Not us, Weebit and Texas Instruments

Weebit Nano (ASX:WBT) signs License Deal with Texas Instruments and bags an Elephant | Stocks Down Under

Weebit Nano Ltd Nano announced it signed an IP (Intellectual Property) license deal with Texas Instruments (TI, NASDAQ:TXN), the world’s largest analog semiconductor manufacturer that generated US$17.3bn in revenues in the last 12 months through 3Q25 (September quarter). In other words, this is...

www.linkedin.com

 

[Sirod69]

good morning to down under

 

[Diogenese]

good morning to down under View attachment 93947

Thanks Sirod,

Just looked at Tradegate where it's up 12% also, on 380k shares, which looks like healthy interest for an away game.

 

[7für7]

There is something in the bush…
Old German saying

 

[Diogenese]

A podcast worth a revisit -

This may be a big part of the reason Akida 2 went to 8 bits from the 4-bit Akida 1. Going to 8 bits gives 16 times more precision. (Let's not even talk about 16-bit and beyond). The point is that they were able to produce a sufficiently convincing demonstration for USAF with 4-bits, but a production model would require greater precision.

Podcast with the late Joe Guerci ISL:

Episode 36: Defense and National Security - BrainChip

At the 4 minute mark, Joe makes the point that USAF was impressed by the ISL Akida radar processor, despite the coarse quantization. USAF saw the tremendous potential for NNs. ISL and BRN were awarded development contracts, in BRN's case this would have been the micro-Doppler radar SBIR which we are fulfilling with RTX.

Joe also mentioned applications such as the loyal wingman collaborative combat aircraft (CCA).

The ability to load different models to perform different functions was also seen as a strong point. As we know, Akida can multitask with audio/video, and/or any other sensor, not to mention pattern recognition, cybersecurity, and much more.

While still on the topic of USAF, Joe referred to "floodgates" ... and that was pre-TENNs!

I suspect the Bascom Hunter 3U VPX SNAP card will be updated with Akida 2 when chips are available.

The recently mentioned see-in-the-dark robot application also derived from the USAF/RTX micro-Doppler radar SBIR.

 

[Pom down under]

I know it doesn’t have to mean something… but it’s nice to see LOL Germany opening

View attachment 93946

Someone must have brought 800 shares