The team is growing and we're hiring again! | Jean Martinet
The team is growing and we're hiring again! Job offer for a PhD in neuromorphic computing with IMRA Europe and i3S lab in Sophia Antipolis, France. Applications are welcome from now!
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
Humble Genius
Regular
The team is growing and we're hiring again! | Jean Martinet
The team is growing and we're hiring again! Job offer for a PhD in neuromorphic computing with IMRA Europe and i3S lab in Sophia Antipolis, France. Applications are welcome from now!www.linkedin.com
View attachment 89171
View attachment 89172
Aisin is part of the Toyota keiretsu.
Space Cadet
Regular
Fair point, how about the 3U VTX Snap Card fr9m BHTech?
Surely we supplied support for this little beauty.
SC
TheDrooben
Pretty Pretty Pretty Pretty Good
BrainChip’s Akida – When Less Compute Is More Intelligence | Andrew O.
BrainChip’s Akida – When Less Compute Is More Intelligence In a world obsessed with bigger models and denser compute, Akida takes a different path—sparse, event-driven, neuromorphic AI built for the edge. It doesn’t waste cycles on static or irrelevant data. It doesn’t need a data center. It...
Happy as Larry
smoothsailing18
Regular
The relationship between Megachips and BrainChip, particularly concerning engineering fees and the five-year license agreement, is governed by the terms of their initial partnership and subsequent amendments. As of July 31, 2025, Megachips continues to pay BrainChip for engineering fees related to the development and integration of BrainChip's Akida neuromorphic processor technology. These fees are typically structured to cover ongoing support, customization, and potentially new feature development as Megachips incorporates Akida into its various products and solutions.[1] The initial agreement, signed in 2020, established a framework for this collaboration, including licensing of the Akida IP and associated engineering services.[2]
According to www.iAsk.Ai - Ask AI:
Regarding the five-year license agreement, the initial five-year term for the Akida IP license between BrainChip and Megachips is set to expire in 2025. At the end of this period, several scenarios are possible, and the specific outcome will depend on the terms outlined in their original agreement and any subsequent negotiations. It is highly probable that Megachips will need to either renew the existing license agreement for another term (e.g., another five years) or negotiate a new agreement to continue using BrainChip's Akida technology.
According to www.iAsk.Ai - Ask AI:
Regarding the five-year license agreement, the initial five-year term for the Akida IP license between BrainChip and Megachips is set to expire in 2025. At the end of this period, several scenarios are possible, and the specific outcome will depend on the terms outlined in their original agreement and any subsequent negotiations. It is highly probable that Megachips will need to either renew the existing license agreement for another term (e.g., another five years) or negotiate a new agreement to continue using BrainChip's Akida technology.
Wags
Regular
Last edited:
smoothsailing18
Regular
So it's still valid until Nov 2025 .
Which means Megachip must still pay engineering fee's were applicable. Who know what they have integrated brn into and what they have not.
Time will tell.
Which means Megachip must still pay engineering fee's were applicable. Who know what they have integrated brn into and what they have not.
Time will tell.
Last edited:
I have a hunch about what Apple is working on and who it's working with.
Apple is pursuing a targeted strategy.
www.linkedin.com
Apple is pursuing a targeted strategy.
Apple recently published new research on LLM reasoning limitations using puzzles for evaluation. | Ron Litvak
Apple recently published new research on LLM reasoning limitations using puzzles for evaluation. While the methodology is interesting, many findings confirm what is already known - models struggle with complex reasoning and waste compute on simple tasks. In fairness, it's cool to see that the...
smoothsailing18
Regular
Itsol4605.......can I ask what makes you think that from reading the white paper ?.
Yes, of course you can ask me.
But let's just wait and see—Apple won't sit idly by.
When I saw reference to LRM (Large Reasoning Model), I immediately thought of Venn Diagrams, and, of course, someone had been there before me:I have a hunch about what Apple is working on and who it's working with.
Apple is pursuing a targeted strategy.
Apple recently published new research on LLM reasoning limitations using puzzles for evaluation. | Ron Litvak
Apple recently published new research on LLM reasoning limitations using puzzles for evaluation. While the methodology is interesting, many findings confirm what is already known - models struggle with complex reasoning and waste compute on simple tasks. In fairness, it's cool to see that the...
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05369v1#... knowledge-intensive question-answering tasks.
[Submitted on 8 Jun 2024]
Venn Diagram Prompting : Accelerating Comprehension with Scaffolding Effect
Sakshi Mahendru, Tejul PanditWe introduce Venn Diagram (VD) Prompting, an innovative prompting technique which allows Large Language Models (LLMs) to combine and synthesize information across complex, diverse and long-context documents in knowledge-intensive question-answering tasks. Generating answers from multiple documents involves numerous steps to extract relevant and unique information and amalgamate it into a cohesive response. To improve the quality of the final answer, multiple LLM calls or pretrained models are used to perform different tasks such as summarization, reorganization and customization. The approach covered in the paper focuses on replacing the multi-step strategy via a single LLM call using VD prompting. Our proposed technique also aims to eliminate the inherent position bias in the LLMs, enhancing consistency in answers by removing sensitivity to the sequence of input information. It overcomes the challenge of inconsistency traditionally associated with varying input sequences. We also explore the practical applications of the VD prompt based on our examination of the prompt's outcomes. In the experiments performed on four public benchmark question-answering datasets, VD prompting continually matches or surpasses the performance of a meticulously crafted instruction prompt which adheres to optimal guidelines and practices.
The authors are from Palo Alto Networks and are inventors in this patent application:
US2025126155A1 ORGANIZATION-SPECIFIC CYBERSECURITY DIALOGUE SYSTEM WITH LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS 20231016
An organization-specific cybersecurity dialogue system (“system”) intelligently generates responses to user utterances for cybersecurity by employing documentation and playbook agents for an associated cybersecurity organization. The system extracts an intent and an intent category from a user utterance, extracts relevant entities from the intent and uses them to determine relevant user telemetry data, and matches the intent, intent category, and user telemetry data to documents of the cybersecurity organization. The system then determines whether to generate a response based on matching document, matching playbook agents, or to prompt a user to create a ticket according to logic applied to the intent, intent category, user telemetry data, and matching documents and generates a corresponding response with large language models.
0019] A response type evaluator 109 applies logic to determine whether to generate a response based on matching documents or based on playbook agents or a response that prompts the user 130 to create a ticket. If the overall ranking 110 indicates at least one document and the user telemetry data 106 does not indicate one or more security appliances associated with the user 130 or with a tenant for the user 130 , the response type evaluator 109 communicates the high ranked (e.g., top-3) documents 126 A to the response generator 111 . The response generator 111 generates abstractive summaries of each of the high ranked documents 126 A and generates one or more prompts to an LLM to generate a response to the user 130 via the user interface 100 . For instance, the generated prompt can prompt the LLM to generate a response that includes the abstractive summaries, hyperlinks to where the high ranked documents 126 A can be accessed, as well as indications of tone and verbosity for the response. The one or more generated prompts were previously engineered by the dialogue system 190 to ensure high quality responses by the LLM. An example response 122 comprises the following: Please read the article at url1 for a tutorial on firewall security policy configuration. The example response 122 can further comprise an abstractive summarization of the content of the article at url1.
The reference to creating a response based on matching documents may have been the seed for the Venn development.
This is an interview with the CEO of Quadric ( the company on the same web page as Brainchip on Megachips website. Douglas Fairbaine liked this post ). Now I’m not qualified enough to understand this fully BUT is it possible he’s talking about AKD1500? There’s a short video of about 5 minutes on this LinkedIn post if someone who knows stuff could see what they think.
www.linkedin.com
Are NPUs a SCAM??? | ipXchange
Are NPUs a SCAM??? Elliott Lee-Hearn from ipXchange sat down with Veerbhan K., CEO of Quadric, to find out why his team thinks the future of AI acceleration isn’t NPUs, but something smarter: a general-purpose neural processing unit that’s reconfigurable, future-proof, and designed to evolve as...
Jinsung Choi….Principal Fellow at SoftBank , AI RAN Alliance chair.
www.linkedin.com
The AI-RAN Architecture Revolution
The solution lies in rethinking the entire AI-RAN stack:
Distributed Intelligence Architecture:
Edge SLMs (1-7B parameters) for real-time RAN decisions
Cloud LLMs for complex network planning and policy creation
Knowledge distillation from teacher models to specialized RAN functions
Hardware-Software Co-Design:
Processing-in-Memory for reduced data movement
NPU/TPI/Neuromorphic processors for event-driven RAN analytics
Custom ARM/RISC-V extensions for telecom-specific operations
Advanced CPUs with integrated AI accelerators for hybrid workloads
Asynchronous pipelining to eliminate GPU idle time
6G-Native Optimizations:
Prefix caching for repetitive network state queries
Heterogeneous computing matched to RAN workload diversity
Energy-aware scheduling tied to network traffic patterns
*my bold
📢 6G AI-RAN Revolution Could Hit a Wall: The Energy Crisis | Jinsung Choi
📢 6G AI-RAN Revolution Could Hit a Wall: The Energy Crisis As we architect the next generation of AI-Native RAN for 6G, we're confronting a sobering reality. Without energy-efficient AI reasoning methods, we face the potential risk of 100x+ energy consumption increases in 6G AI-RAN deployments...
The AI-RAN Architecture Revolution The solution lies in rethinking the entire AI-RAN stack:
Distributed Intelligence Architecture:Edge SLMs (1-7B parameters) for real-time RAN decisions
Cloud LLMs for complex network planning and policy creation
Knowledge distillation from teacher models to specialized RAN functions
Hardware-Software Co-Design:Processing-in-Memory for reduced data movement
NPU/TPI/Neuromorphic processors for event-driven RAN analytics
Custom ARM/RISC-V extensions for telecom-specific operations
Advanced CPUs with integrated AI accelerators for hybrid workloads
Asynchronous pipelining to eliminate GPU idle time
6G-Native Optimizations:Prefix caching for repetitive network state queries
Heterogeneous computing matched to RAN workload diversity
Energy-aware scheduling tied to network traffic patterns
*my bold
Pom down under
Top 20
Veleo and not sure if posted before as nearly a year old
WO2024160994A1 - Method of reconstructing a property of an image and computing device - Google Patents
The present application relates to a Method of reconstructing a property of an image in a sequence of images with a spiking neural network. The method comprises: obtaining raw data of the image (RDt), calculating a similarity measure using raw data of the image (RDt) and raw data of a previous...
patents.google.com
Good evening,
Having read yesterday the company's 4C & Quarterly Report I felt overall it was positive, the Board appears to have done a
thorough evaluation of their earlier statement about moving our entire listing offshore to the US, yes, that's correct, the USA.
And the decision/recommendation was a solid NO.........in my opinion it was/is way too early and that the Chairperson is
part of a team that never ever revolves around one individual and his fickle ideas, once again, that's my private view.
The revenue appeared to represent a 10-fold increase, now no shareholder should assume anything at this point, what we
would like to see is back-back quarters, showing another increase, say 2 million +.... slowly increasing, but continually, quarter
on quarter, remembering that we are still starting from a very low base.
A concern to me was the failure to raise the 20 million AUD, receiving the 8.2 million AUD at an average of 0.2059, surely this
wasn't the agreement, I must be going mad, I thought the agreement was more like 0.50 a share x 40 million shares issued,
and I thought that Ken Scarince confirmed as such at the AGM?......so clearly, I am wrong.
Never-the-less we have approximately 17.3 million USD to 1 August 2025.......plus revenue (if any).
The grind continues.
Goodnight, All......Tech
Having read yesterday the company's 4C & Quarterly Report I felt overall it was positive, the Board appears to have done a
thorough evaluation of their earlier statement about moving our entire listing offshore to the US, yes, that's correct, the USA.
And the decision/recommendation was a solid NO.........in my opinion it was/is way too early and that the Chairperson is
part of a team that never ever revolves around one individual and his fickle ideas, once again, that's my private view.
The revenue appeared to represent a 10-fold increase, now no shareholder should assume anything at this point, what we
would like to see is back-back quarters, showing another increase, say 2 million +.... slowly increasing, but continually, quarter
on quarter, remembering that we are still starting from a very low base.
A concern to me was the failure to raise the 20 million AUD, receiving the 8.2 million AUD at an average of 0.2059, surely this
wasn't the agreement, I must be going mad, I thought the agreement was more like 0.50 a share x 40 million shares issued,
and I thought that Ken Scarince confirmed as such at the AGM?......so clearly, I am wrong.
Never-the-less we have approximately 17.3 million USD to 1 August 2025.......plus revenue (if any).
The grind continues.
Goodnight, All......Tech
Got curious on what is happening in Bascom Hunter and found that they have recently posted several jobs
Director of Electronic Warfare Systems
Director - ISR Systems
Program Manager
Senior RF Engineer
and the SBIR award end date is on 18th August for
Implementing Neural Network Algorithms on Neuromorphic Processors
Director of Electronic Warfare Systems
Director - ISR Systems
Program Manager
Senior RF Engineer
and the SBIR award end date is on 18th August for
Implementing Neural Network Algorithms on Neuromorphic Processors
Stable Genius
Regular
FG is on the job!
www.linkedin.com
Our Director of Engineering,Jan Andersson Nerén, presented the GR801 at the IEEE Space Computing + Space Mission Challenges for Information Technology conference. | Frontgrade Gaisler
Our Director of Engineering,Jan Andersson Nerén, presented the GR801 at the IEEE Space Computing + Space Mission Challenges for Information Technology conference. GR801 is a radiation-hardened SoC designed to enable reliable artificial intelligence (AI) applications in space. The GR801 device...
FiveBucks
Regular
Good evening,
Having read yesterday the company's 4C & Quarterly Report I felt overall it was positive, the Board appears to have done a
thorough evaluation of their earlier statement about moving our entire listing offshore to the US, yes, that's correct, the USA.
And the decision/recommendation was a solid NO.........in my opinion it was/is way too early and that the Chairperson is
part of a team that never ever revolves around one individual and his fickle ideas, once again, that's my private view.
The revenue appeared to represent a 10-fold increase, now no shareholder should assume anything at this point, what we
would like to see is back-back quarters, showing another increase, say 2 million +.... slowly increasing, but continually, quarter
on quarter, remembering that we are still starting from a very low base.
A concern to me was the failure to raise the 20 million AUD, receiving the 8.2 million AUD at an average of 0.2059, surely this
wasn't the agreement, I must be going mad, I thought the agreement was more like 0.50 a share x 40 million shares issued,
and I thought that Ken Scarince confirmed as such at the AGM?......so clearly, I am wrong.
Never-the-less we have approximately 17.3 million USD to 1 August 2025.......plus revenue (if any).
The grind continues.
Goodnight, All......Tech
If you want to see a good 4C from an early stage tech company, check out WBTs which was announced today.
Brainchip is progressing but it's like watching someone sculpt the statue of David using their fingernails.
Curious about running AI on the GR740? | Klepsydra Technologies
Curious about running AI on the GR740? Visit the Frontgrade Gaisler booth at SMC/IT, where Klepsydra Technologies is showcasing a live AI demo for space situational awareness. Thanks to our high-performance inference software, the AI algorithm runs at remarkable speed. Ideal for demanding...
Is this also Akida?
Bravo
If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
Good evening,
Having read yesterday the company's 4C & Quarterly Report I felt overall it was positive, the Board appears to have done a
thorough evaluation of their earlier statement about moving our entire listing offshore to the US, yes, that's correct, the USA.
And the decision/recommendation was a solid NO.........in my opinion it was/is way too early and that the Chairperson is
part of a team that never ever revolves around one individual and his fickle ideas, once again, that's my private view.
The revenue appeared to represent a 10-fold increase, now no shareholder should assume anything at this point, what we
would like to see is back-back quarters, showing another increase, say 2 million +.... slowly increasing, but continually, quarter
on quarter, remembering that we are still starting from a very low base.
A concern to me was the failure to raise the 20 million AUD, receiving the 8.2 million AUD at an average of 0.2059, surely this
wasn't the agreement, I must be going mad, I thought the agreement was more like 0.50 a share x 40 million shares issued,
and I thought that Ken Scarince confirmed as such at the AGM?......so clearly, I am wrong.
Never-the-less we have approximately 17.3 million USD to 1 August 2025.......plus revenue (if any).
The grind continues.
Goodnight, All......Tech
Hi Tech,
I think it's important to acknowledge that many of us, were raising red flags about listing in the US from the outset.
I wouldn’t give too much credit for the BOD reversing a decision that should never have progressed as far as it did.
I think of it as a bit of a misstep.
But I get that everyone will have a different opinion.
Cheers,
B
Similar threads
