Space Cadet
Regular
Always look on the bright side of life.Speaking of sanctions:
I wonder what’s the punishment for violating the spelling of our company’s name ON OUR OWN WEBSITE?
View attachment 85548
I'm Brian and so is my wife.
SC
Always look on the bright side of life.Speaking of sanctions:
I wonder what’s the punishment for violating the spelling of our company’s name ON OUR OWN WEBSITE?
View attachment 85548
I can’t see anything wrongSpeaking of sanctions:
I wonder what’s the punishment for violating the spelling of our company’s name ON OUR OWN WEBSITE?
View attachment 85548
Hey SC,Always look on the bright side of life.
I'm Brian and so is my wife.
SC
I just listed to to this podcast, which was recorded two days ago with Ilay Marom from Nanose Medical.
In the podcast Ilay discusses Nanose's non-invasive hand-held breath test which can provide early detection of Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). He talks about how it can do via a sensor array using a pattern recognition algorithm. He believes the device will be a "game-changer" because it can be used everywhere.
He talks about the how the technology was invented over a decade ago at Technion Israel Institute of Technology by Prof. Hossam Haick.
When asked to explain the technology he talked a bit about nano particles but he said he couldn't talk about what was different about their sensors because part of it is confidential. He mentioned that there are 7 patents for the technology held by Technion, 1 patent is Nanose own and there another 4 patents pending.
Ilay repeated that the way they produce their sensor is not patented, that instead it's a "trade secret". He describes it being the secret sauce, like the Coca-Cola recipe.
Nanose are hoping to bring this device to the market by 2026 to detect MASLD (fatty liver disease) and then expect to be able to bring another variation to market to detect lung disease by 2027.
Asked about their 5 year plan, Ilay said he hopes the device will be in every clinic and that it will save millions of lives and billions of dollars.
If I'm not mistaken, I recall that a few years ago Nanose had some sort of issue with the manufacturing of the sensors that meant they couldn't achieve consistent results, so they must have somehow overcome this issue, which is great new.
I also remember someone from this forum saying they had spoken to PVDM after the 2022 AGM and Peter had apparently confirmed that the problem was only with the sensor and not with our technology. I don't know if anyone else has more information to add about whether this is correct?
For convenience I've also attached Rich Wawrzyniak's 2021 Nanose/BrainChip Blog. It shows a list of diseases detected with the Nanose device. Curiously MASLD isn't one of them.
View attachment 81097
The above Semico article is also still displayed on our website, if that means anything.
View attachment 81098
Nice work NaNose!
Nanose Medical won first place in the startup competition at the Bynet Data Communications, powered by NVIDIA!
In regards to BrainChip's ongoing involvement, I stumbled upon @Deena's post dated 14 November 2023. I'm unsure if anyone has heard anything more recent by way of additional confirmation?
View attachment 85600
View attachment 85599
It's plausible that Nanose are utilizing one of NVIDIA's Jetson modules, which means the device won't have the ultra low power energy efficiency that Akida can offer.Powered by fu…in NVIDIA
NVIDIA=
Next-gen
Verified
Inference
Doesn’t
Involve
AKIDA
„
R U OK Pom?Charts been looking crap for sometime and your comment is a typical hot crapper comment
View attachment 85493
BRN chart wise has been in a long range/base since around September 2023.R U OK Pom?
You sounds bitter, old mate. I thought you're going to keep accumulating and be greedy in times like this.
C'mon then, show us the buy order old chap!
I am just stating what the charts are showing.
And remember, we are on the same boat so I share your frustrations.
Not advice
Never bitter just playing games with all the weasels from hot crapperR U OK Pom?
You sounds bitter, old mate. I thought you're going to keep accumulating and be greedy in times like this.
C'mon then, show us the buy order old chap!
I am just stating what the charts are showing.
And remember, we are on the same boat so I share your frustrations.
Not advice
Could NVIDIA's Jeston series sniff out the VOC particles with the same accuracy as BrainChip's Akida in relation to Nanose?Isn't it Akida that specifically is what helps Nanose sniff partials out or is Jetson able to also do this as well ?.
Feature | BrainChip Akida | NVIDIA Jetson (e.g., Xavier NX, Orin) |
---|---|---|
Architecture | Neuromorphic (Spiking Neural Network) | GPU-accelerated (deep learning, CNNs, LSTMs) |
Data Model | Event-based / spike-encoded | Frame-based / dense tensor processing |
VOC Sensor Interface | Optimized for real-time spiking data (e.g., AERO encoding) | Can interface but needs preprocessing |
Latency | Ultra-low (milliseconds) | Higher (requires buffer + batch inference) |
Power Efficiency | Micro-watt to milli-watt range | Several watts to tens of watts |
Accuracy with NaNose | Demonstrated 97%+ accuracy using spike-based classification | Potentially similar, but with higher power cost and latency |
Training Approach | Online/on-device continual learning | Typically pre-trained and updated via cloud or edge inference |
Scalability | Excellent for embedded sensors | Better for multi-modal, compute-heavy scenarios |
I call upon the omnipotent power of the universe to grant us a "Trading halt" followed by news of a significant partnership by big tech or/and an offer to buy us out for 5 dollars a share....BRN chart wise has been in a long range/base since around September 2023.
Its generally accepted that Neuromorphic AI at the Edge will experience exponential growth.
BRN is generally accepted as the leader of Neuromorphic AI.
At this stage of the cycle those who believe the above is true will accumulate patiently.
The role of good news:
If you believe the above is true then really good news will be the catalyst to break the equilibrium of the range/base and attract new buyers to the extent we will see higher highs and higher lows confirming a sustained uptrend.
Once the trend is established we will then see momentum investing.
Generally, a long base at lows followed by really good news on volume is a classic technical pattern for identifying potential significant price increases.
Followed by counter offers from other big tech competitors ending up at $14 a share. One can dream but if you have an offer you want more than one interested.I call upon the omnipotent power of the universe to grant us a "Trading halt" followed by news of a significant partnership by big tech or/and an offer to buy us out for 5 dollars a share....![]()
This is why Nanose originally chose BRN:Could NVIDIA's Jeston series sniff out the VOC particles with the same accuracy as BrainChip's Akida in relation to Nanose?
ChatGPT said:
The short answer is: not directly — NVIDIA Jetson modules and BrainChip’s Akida neuromorphic processor operate on fundamentally different architectures and processing models. While both can process data from an e-nose (electronic nose) sensor array, Akida has specific advantages for low-power, real-time inference of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) due to its neuromorphic design.
Breakdown: Jetson vs. Akida for VOC Detection (e.g., in NaNose)
Feature BrainChip Akida NVIDIA Jetson (e.g., Xavier NX, Orin) Architecture Neuromorphic (Spiking Neural Network) GPU-accelerated (deep learning, CNNs, LSTMs) Data Model Event-based / spike-encoded Frame-based / dense tensor processing VOC Sensor Interface Optimized for real-time spiking data (e.g., AERO encoding) Can interface but needs preprocessing Latency Ultra-low (milliseconds) Higher (requires buffer + batch inference) Power Efficiency Micro-watt to milli-watt range Several watts to tens of watts Accuracy with NaNose Demonstrated 97%+ accuracy using spike-based classification Potentially similar, but with higher power cost and latency Training Approach Online/on-device continual learning Typically pre-trained and updated via cloud or edge inference Scalability Excellent for embedded sensors Better for multi-modal, compute-heavy scenarios
Why Akida May Be Better Suited for VOC Detection in NaNose-Type Devices
- Real-Time Spike-Based Classification
- VOCs generate dynamic, time-dependent signals. Akida processes them directly as spikes, which mimics the biological olfactory system.
- Jetson would require conversion of VOC sensor data into tensors, potentially losing time-domain resolution and increasing preprocessing complexity.
- On-Device Learning
- Akida supports on-chip continual learning, useful for adapting to new users, environments, or sensor drift.
- Jetson typically relies on cloud-based retraining or large local models with fixed parameters.
- Power Budget
- NaNose aims for handheld, portable diagnostics — environments where Jetson’s 10–15W draw (or more) is impractical compared to Akida’s sub-1W footprint.
- Biological Relevance
- Akida’s neuromorphic design is inspired by the human olfactory cortex, making it intrinsically well-suited to VOC processing.
- Jetson is general-purpose AI hardware — very powerful but not biologically inspired or VOC-specialized.
Yes. It's theoretically feasible for a hybrid system:
Could They Be Used Together?
- Akida could perform first-pass classification or anomaly detection from e-nose input.
- Jetson could handle broader context processing, GUI, connectivity, or integration with other modalities (e.g., image + breath analysis).
While Jetson modules are powerful general-purpose AI edge processors, BrainChip’s Akida is purpose-built for ultra-low-power, spike-based sensory tasks like VOC detection. In a medical e-nose like NaNose, Akida is likely more efficient, biologically aligned, and better suited to the task, especially where power, latency, and real-time accuracy are critical.
Conclusion
ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.
Already haveHow about 70 of us on this forum purchase a syndicate ticket in next Tuesday's $70 million OZ Lotto draw?
![]()