Hope not
Another extension will mean we're going to get absolutely rinsed on the terms. (more rinsed?)
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
Another extension will mean we're going to get absolutely rinsed on the terms. (more rinsed?)
Why?
Thread should be for discussion, not endless social media screenshots.
John25
Regular
your work
Last edited:
Samus
Top 20
It's really none of your business what other peoples averages are, what does it matter?
Looks like you woke up on the wrong side of the bed and decided to behave like an asshole.
If you'd been reading the forums you'd know, many people appreciate the posts from X where shareholders actually engage with the detractors and corrupt authorities responsible for putting us in this position.
This is because they aren't on X themselves and/or can't be bothered wading through the quagmire of shit on that platform.
BTW people who go around moderating the posts of valuable contributors here don't last long on the platform. We've seen it many times.
Last edited:
It was a question as people's opinions are different on what they want to happen/direction of company depending on their sp average.
I get it, you want all the media posts in one spot, you like discussion but don't actually discuss Franks posts.
You think that everyones opinion on how they want to get their capital back should be the same?
Someone who took a gamble at 4c should have the same opinion of someone who bought at $1.10, do they have the same views on non-disclosure?
If you like Frank's posts.....Discuss them or as I asked create a separate thread for viewing as it clogs up/prevents discussion.
Keep up the excellent work Frank, saves me the time I don’t have to keep up to speed with these corrupt arseholes.
I know this is not the place for financial or investment advice (or marriage advice for that matter), but I also know that there are many experienced investors here.
All this talk of offers to buy shares at rock bottom prices (a la J Mitchell) got me wondering if the de-listing currently presents an opportunity to restructure one's holdings without a big CGT hit.
For example, if one was considering transferring one's shares to a trust fund or similar, whether that transaction could be done such that it triggers a capital loss event (ie sell your shares at 0.01c to your trust).
As above, not looking for advice, just opinions.
All this talk of offers to buy shares at rock bottom prices (a la J Mitchell) got me wondering if the de-listing currently presents an opportunity to restructure one's holdings without a big CGT hit.
For example, if one was considering transferring one's shares to a trust fund or similar, whether that transaction could be done such that it triggers a capital loss event (ie sell your shares at 0.01c to your trust).
As above, not looking for advice, just opinions.
Spikerama
Regular
Yes but if I remember correctly at that time, even though Frank had a win, it was requested by many that he not just post pictures of the posts but actual links so that those who are on X (formerly twitter) can easily go there and make hay.
He actually did start doing that but seems to have reverted back to screened again.
Naughty Frank
Samus
Top 20
My view on that is that management need to achieve a minimum price at or above $1.36 to cover their own arses. That or re-listing on the back of positive progression.
As for the rest of what you said, at least you explained it instead of a couple of phrases that came across as pretty rude.
But if you're the one moderating Frank's posts based on not being posted in English, then it doesn't really align with what you said publicly either.
If you don't like Frank's post, you have the option of ignoring the posts, or putting frank on ignore.
It's quite simple, when im too lazy to read through a whole bunch of text , then I just scroll past it ... It's not rocket science.
Other people may want to read up on that stuff.
That would be $1.36 after AVZ pay Tax to the DRC . So we'd be looking at AUD$6Billion + just for some SH to break even . I suspect we will never trade again . So that share price is frozen in time . I would like to see every SH get their money back plus at least a bank interest amount of profit on top of that . However I'm not sure that is being realistic . Should the 1000's of SH who got in lower be held to ransom for those that didn't ?Or be held to ransom so management can cover their arses ? Majority rules .
Samus
Top 20
I don't necessarily disagree wombat, I'm just saying in my view that management will be looking to cover themselves at all costs if possible.
I don't think shareholders like you and I will have much of a say on that, we're just here pissing in the wind at the whim of other people.
Similar threads
