Not necessarily. I agree with 9Card that even if Zijin have returned the 15%, it wasn't done unwillingly. There was no doubt a deal done. However this doesn't need to be a deal on some other unrelated benefit they can get from DRC, it could still be part of some for now unseen strategy regarding Manono. I just don't see then giving up at this point. The prize is too large and the cost relatively small - legal fees and some potential reputational risk. So if this were the case, they may not cancel their ICC cases which could fit into their previous delayance strategy.This document has been around for 8 days . AVZ BoD know share holders have a photo copy . If it is rubbish they will remain silent . Otherwise something has to give . With respect to 9cardomaha's point , I don't see why the ICC case in a few weeks will go ahead if the 15% has been surrendered . That to me will be the indicator whether this is another false flag . At least it's not too long wait to find out .
Zijin deserves a pineapple without lubrication, or simple the Chinese way, the bullet.If Zijin have returned or conceded any ownership of the 15%, PR05 could have just used a stick not a carrot. Lot's of chatter about warnings provided to Zijin prior to the visit to China.
Or of course, both a carrot AND a stick could have been used. I hope it was a big stick and a small carrot that PR05 repeatedly used on Zijin. (with no lubrication)
![]()
Gotta agree Nut, reading the bible makes more sense.Seriously these supposedly official fucked up documents with spelling errors and copy/paste birthdates are doing my fucking head in
Can't believe a fucking thing on the internet or coming out of the DRC
Jesus fucking Christ when are we going to get some official information on what the actual fuck is going on?????
Fuck me....
Seriously these supposedly official fucked up documents with spelling errors and copy/paste birthdates are doing my fucking head in
Can't believe a fucking thing on the internet or coming out of the DRC
Jesus fucking Christ when are we going to get some official information on what the actual fuck is going on?????
Fuck me....
Please don't take this the wrong way, but Put a cork in it buddy!Can't help but think and look back on some of Nigel's interviews over the years outlining how efficient the govt was and how good relations were even mentioning MoP directly. Nigel is in a world of shit if he cannot pull a positive outcome for shareholders. Also, both him and Greame would be wealthy in their own right but imagine if they lost the lot at the end of their careers + reputational damage - c'mon boys lets get something going
This is what I've been wondering also Fox. Why does everyone assume zijn 'got' something like n return for pulling out?If Zijin have returned or conceded any ownership of the 15%, PR05 could have just used a stick not a carrot. Lot's of chatter about warnings provided to Zijin prior to the visit to China.
Or of course, both a carrot AND a stick could have been used. I hope it was a big stick and a small carrot that PR05 repeatedly used on Zijin. (with no lubrication)
![]()
Can't help but think and look back on some of Nigel's interviews over the years outlining how efficient the govt was and how good relations were even mentioning MoP directly. Nigel is in a world of shit if he cannot pull a positive outcome for shareholders. Also, both him and Greame would be wealthy in their own right but imagine if they lost the lot at the end of their careers + reputational damage - c'mon boys lets get something going
Problem is, what should be an open-shut case takes so fucking long.My view on Dathomir still being there aligns with the ICC case AVZ brought against Simon CUNT and Dathomir.
Our case against them is to get ICC to enforce the sale because they have sellers remorse.
Correct. The only way AVZ can get around needing the ICC for the Dathomir 15% to be transferred to them is if the DRC government intervenes, someone gives Cong more money or Cong decides to comply with the contracts he signed (and intended to be bound by) to avoid being made liable for damages. One of those scenarios is far more likely than the ICC cases brought by AVZ against Dathomir running the full course imoMy view on Dathomir still being there aligns with the ICC case AVZ brought against Simon CUNT and Dathomir.
Our case against them is to get ICC to enforce the sale because they have sellers remorse.
Many have justifiably criticised him here.Can't help but think and look back on some of Nigel's interviews over the years outlining how efficient the govt was and how good relations were even mentioning MoP directly. Nigel is in a world of shit if he cannot pull a positive outcome for shareholders. Also, both him and Greame would be wealthy in their own right but imagine if they lost the lot at the end of their careers + reputational damage - c'mon boys lets get something going