This is a decent summaryFrom what i have found they hold for insto's mainly.. So it could be a big fish buying in behind the scenes.
Will this need a ASX Ann..?? Since there is a substantial change in holdings..??
I bought a very small parcel today..Well said, burn baby burn!
So, it appears that their main weapon is to create fear?
The price drops but most of us consider buying more because the shares are more affordable, not sell them as they want
This is a decent summary
What is a Nominee Company and Why are They Used? | The Quinn Group
A corporate nominee is most frequently used to hold shares in trust on behalf of the beneficial owner. To ensure the beneficial owner retains control over the shares, an agreement between the nominee shareholder and the beneficial owner is executed.www.quinns.com.au
Yes one reason the article says for their use...On the other hand, a company that wants to take over control of another company may wish to keep confidential of its identity so that it would encounter little or no resistance to the first stage of take over or perhaps be able to buy the shares at a lower price than otherwise, since the market price usually goes up when a take-over bid is made
Might have been more volume on Chi-X?How is it that 12.4 million shorts can be closed on the 5th July when the volume is only 9 million……
"Will this need a ASX Ann..?? Since there is a substantial change in holdings..??"From what i have found they hold for insto's mainly.. So it could be a big fish buying in behind the scenes.
Will this need a ASX Ann..?? Since there is a substantial change in holdings..??
IMO, Would be stupid to do any takeover without Peters and Anil's full blessing. But then again money and added company benefits talks at all levels.I just don't see the value in a hostile takeover. All the future is still in PVDM's mind and hands. Without his willing co operation it would be like buying a hollow shell. Sure, there is value in where we are up to and with what is in the immediate pipeline, but we are still just at the beginning and Peter makes the secret sauce.
They make plays. All we can do is react appropriately according to our circumstance.These two linked documents show that the rise in short positions to record levels is likely down to CitiCorp Nominees.
eg
View attachment 11152
did you read my last post?"Will this need a ASX Ann..?? Since there is a substantial change in holdings..??"
I Agree Townyj!
Disclosure Requirements - Australia
www.clearstream.com
"The shareholder must thereafter notify the company and the relevant market operator of any subsequent change of 1% or more in their interests. When a person ceases to be a substantial shareholder, that person must equally notify the company and the relevant market operator"
Sounds to me, that there should have been several, Substantial change in shareholding notices regarding Citicorp.
They are extremely important, to the market, if such large accumulation, is going on.
Sounds like Citigroup, have been ignoring their obligations?
Even if they are held by various parties, they are registered with them?
Wish we had a lawyer type on here, that could get to the bottom of this and set it straight..
I'm most likely wrong, but what worries me here (ie with Citicorp accumilating) is perhaps the possibility of a hostile takeover? If indeed they are involved in/ or manipulating/ holding the SP down and they are then in a position to do a takeover (ie buy up all shares), we may never realise an SP in the multiple dollar amountThey make plays. All we can do is react appropriately according to our circumstance.
Knowing what is possible though gives us some breathing room to make calm and rational decisions.
I'm invested, looking for the long play and having already ridden this baby from 3+ cents through $2.34 and then back to here, the bastardo's won't shake me off for some magic beans.
GLTAH
If you are right I don't believe there is anything that I could do to stop it, beyond voting my shares in whichever way PVDM recommends.I'm most likely wrong, but what worries me here (ie with Citicorp accumilating) is perhaps the possibility of a hostile takeover? If indeed they are involved in/ or manipulating/ holding the SP down and they are then in a position to do a takeover (ie buy up all shares), we may never realise an SP in the multiple dollar amount
(Disclaimer - I have no concise knowledge on this topic, but I've been burnt before when lovely Gina Reinhart ended up buying out an Iron Ore stock I once held for a small percentage of its true worth).
Thats why no one should sell any of their shares!
I only glanced..did you read my last post?