Does the 10% automatically go to the Gov or does CKK have control over it ?
CKK and the green cunt want the 10% ceded on a pro rata basis. Unfortunately for them the contract Cominiere signed says it is their responsibility. Unfortunately for us the law means absolutely fucking nothing in the DRC.
So AVZ are recognised by the DRC gov as having legal title to 60%. If Dathcom was to cede 10% that leaves us with 50%? So we need to sort out the issues with Dathomir to be the majority holderCKK and the green cunt want the 10% ceded on a pro rata basis. Unfortunately for them the contract Cominiere signed says it is their responsibility. Unfortunately for us the law means absolutely fucking nothing in the DRC.
Dathcom need to cede 10% to the DRC government under Article 71 (d) of the mining code
View attachment 41949
Cominiere are committed to being the party within Dathcom to cede the 10% to the DRC government under Article 5.1 (i) of the Dathcom JVA
View attachment 41950
View attachment 41951
On a pro rata basis AVZ would need to cede 6% of their 60% current holding in Dathcom that would leave us with 54%So AVZ are recognised by the DRC gov as having legal title to 60%. If Dathcom was to cede 10% that leaves us with 50%? So we need to sort out the issues with Dathomir to be the majority holder
Great work mate, everything at your fingertips. @MoneyBags1348 - for filing reference at your leisureCKK and the green cunt want the 10% ceded on a pro rata basis. Unfortunately for them the contract Cominiere signed says it is their responsibility. Unfortunately for us the law means absolutely fucking nothing in the DRC.
Dathcom need to cede 10% to the DRC government under Article 71 (d) of the mining code
View attachment 41949
Cominiere are committed to being the party within Dathcom to cede the 10% to the DRC government under Article 5.1 (i) of the Dathcom JVA
View attachment 41950
View attachment 41951
Yep, great ThanksOn a pro rata basis AVZ would need to cede 6% of their 60% current holding in Dathcom that would leave us with 54%
Great work mate, everything at your fingertips. @MoneyBags1348 - for filing reference at your leisure
I’m near certain the english version of the mining of the mining code is in the legislation thread. If not, i’ll add it.Great work mate, everything at your fingertips. @MoneyBags1348 - for filing reference at your leisure
I’m near certain the english version of the mining of the mining code is in the legislation thread. If not, i’ll add it.
Edit: it’s here.
DRC MINING LEGISLATION
The 2018 English Version of the DRC Mining Code is in a file at the bottom of this page, posted by @Mr Inappropriate and also bottom of page 6 https://congomines.org/system/attachments/assets/000/000/101/original/GOVRDC-2003-ReglementMinier-EN.pdf?1430927814thestockexchange.com.au
Cock-punch gratefully accepted, @MoneyBags1348.Thanks Mr I, I know you provided it to me before and that thread is about 6 pages long now but I will add it in anyway
And as a thank you for your hard work and tireless efforts, please accept the following as your just reward
View attachment 41961
But I do not see where anywhere where pro-rata is required or specified?On a pro rata basis AVZ would need to cede 6% of their 60% current holding in Dathcom that would leave us with 54%
What shit fuckery? CKK still at Com?So with all this shit fuckery still in full effect whats the Chinese whispers saying? That July/August news now pushed out?
But I do not see where anywhere where pro-rata is required or specified?
Well someone does as here we are 16 or whatever months into this and to be honest ( and a little frustrated ) not a single announcement from AVZ with positive progress made. Not me being negative just stating fact.What shit fuckery? CKK still at Com?
I don't believe they have any influence at this point.
Great post and thank you CarlosCKK and the green cunt want the 10% ceded on a pro rata basis. Unfortunately for them the contract Cominiere signed says it is their responsibility. Unfortunately for us the law means absolutely fucking nothing in the DRC.
Dathcom need to cede 10% to the DRC government under Article 71 (d) of the mining code
View attachment 41949
Cominiere are committed to being the party within Dathcom to cede the 10% to the DRC government under Article 5.1 (i) of the Dathcom JVA
View attachment 41950
View attachment 41951
Well this is Chinese whispers central, who the fuck else would I ask? AVZ?You're right it's shitful as all hell.
Only Nigel and co have the info, and it's being very closely guarded.
No one here knows anything, some hear things and give their opinions about where we are based on that.
I've made a couple of statements recently as to where I think we're at, I'm still of the same opinion and am still hearing very positive things.
Didn't get the timing right but I don't think it's too far out.
But also I'm just saying, what are you asking us for? No one here knows.
Could also be a translation issue. But as english yes that is fuzzy.Great post and thank you Carlos
Looking at it a bit closer and re-reading the relevant articles
"Dathcom need to cede 10% to the DRC government under Article 71 (d) of the mining code"
Very clear
View attachment 41963
"Cominiere are committed to being the party within Dathcom to cede the 10% to the DRC government under Article 5.1 (i) of the Dathcom JVA"
A little bit "fuzzier"
View attachment 41964
Here under the Dathcom JVA Cominiere is commited to transferring "part of it's partcipation in Dathcom Mining SAS"
Does that imply Cominiere is not the "only" party nominated to participate in ceding the required 10% to the GOVT? ie the other parties with owenership interest in Dathcom Mining SAS will also cede some of their shares to make up the required 10%???
Is this where the notion of a pro-rata is coming from?