BRN Discussion Ongoing

TheDrooben

Pretty Pretty Pretty Pretty Good
Lots of what we've all been waiting for is happening.
Out of ASX300 so maybe we can get some clear air and relief from some of the shorting activity for a while.

Could be something announced in next couple of days priming for Sean's presentation at semiconductor conference on Wednesday?

Excited by what Kevin is 'show and telling' but can't quite work out where it's taking us........ if anywhere?
Am sort of surprised he hasn't been muzzled by IBM?
If we were in quiet negotiations behind closed doors they would surely shut him up.
If not, why publicise the possibility's allowing other's to leverage the idea's?
He doesn't strike me as the rogue agent type.
I'm grateful and excited by what he is producing and his whole hearted endorsement of our tech but somewhat mystified by just what's in it for him?
Seems he has somewhat, already gone overboard, if his primary intention is just to further promote symphony?

More questions than answers atm.
I think we need to call him Big Kev from now on HP.....

tZTsqPc.gif


Happy as Big Kev
 
  • Haha
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: 19 users

jrp173

Regular
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

Terroni2105

Founding Member
Lots of what we've all been waiting for is happening.
Out of ASX300 so maybe we can get some clear air and relief from some of the shorting activity for a while.

Could be something announced in next couple of days priming for Sean's presentation at semiconductor conference on Wednesday?

Excited by what Kevin is 'show and telling' but can't quite work out where it's taking us........ if anywhere?
Am sort of surprised he hasn't been muzzled by IBM?
If we were in quiet negotiations behind closed doors they would surely shut him up.
If not, why publicise the possibility's allowing other's to leverage the idea's?
He doesn't strike me as the rogue agent type.
I'm grateful and excited by what he is producing and his whole hearted endorsement of our tech but somewhat mystified by just what's in it for him?
Seems he has somewhat, already gone overboard, if his primary intention is just to further promote symphony?

More questions than answers atm.
Hi Hopa

i tried to clarify this in my mind a week or so ago by asking Grok.

I asked again now and this is the response of what is role does which seems to align clearly with what we are seeing him do “blogging and evangelizing IBM’s capabilities”:

Kevin D. Johnson is a Field CTO at IBM, specifically focused on HPC (High-Performance Computing), AI, LLMs (Large Language Models), and Quantum Computing. His full title is often listed as Field CTO – HPC, AI, LLM & Quantum Computing | Principal HPC Cloud Technical Specialist at IBM.

What the Role Involves (Simply)​

As a Field CTO, Kevin acts as a senior technical leader and expert advisor who works directly with clients, partners, and internal teams in the field (not just in headquarters). His responsibilities include:

  • Providing deep technical guidance on IBM's advanced technologies like Spectrum Symphony (for workload orchestration), GPFS/Storage, LSF, and emerging AI/HPC solutions.
  • Helping customers deploy and optimize these tools in demanding environments (government, research, finance, etc.).
  • Exploring and prototyping cutting-edge integrations (e.g., with neuromorphic chips like BrainChip Akida, Palantir Foundry, or distributed AI setups) to demonstrate real-world value.
  • Speaking, blogging, and evangelizing IBM's capabilities through demos, articles, and community posts (he's very active on IBM Community and LinkedIn).
  • Bridging between IBM's engineering/R&D and real customer needs — he's hands-on with code, architectures, and proofs-of-concept.
It's a senior, influential role — not the overall IBM CTO (that's someone else), but a specialized Field CTO who has significant autonomy to innovate and influence in his domain (HPC/AI/Quantum). He often builds and shares personal prototypes (like the targeting system with Symphony + Akida + Foundry) to showcase possibilities, even if they're not yet official IBM products.

In short: He's an expert "technical ambassador" for IBM's high-end computing and AI tech, working with clients and the ecosystem to push boundaries and solve complex problems.


apparently they have multiple field CTO’s but IBM doesn’t disclose how many.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 27 users

Tothemoon24

Top 20


IMG_2352.jpeg


  • Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) has agreed to collaborate with BrainChip Holdings on using the ForwardEdge ASIC for next generation AI powered edge processing.
  • The partnership targets aerospace and defense systems that require low latency, on board autonomous decision making in complex environments.
  • The focus is on integrating neuromorphic AI directly into custom silicon, moving beyond traditional hardware and software upgrades.

For you as an investor, this points to how Lockheed Martin is positioning its defense electronics and mission systems businesses for AI centric demand. The company already operates across fighter aircraft, missile defense, space systems, and advanced sensors, and this collaboration ties directly into interest in AI enabled sensing and autonomy across those areas.

Looking ahead, a central issue is the pace at which AI on custom chips becomes a standard feature of defense platforms, and how Lockheed Martin seeks to translate that shift into contracts and long term programs. This development gives you another angle to watch beyond headline contract announcements, with particular relevance to future product architectures and partnership activity in AI hardware.

This collaboration with BrainChip’s neuromorphic AI on the ForwardEdge application specific chip sits at the center of how Lockheed Martin is trying to reposition its defense electronics. Instead of relying only on standard CPUs, GPUs, or software upgrades, it points to dedicated AI accelerators that sit close to the sensor on aircraft, missiles, or space systems and make decisions with very low latency. For you, the key question is how far Lockheed Martin can turn this kind of silicon level AI into differentiated proposals when competing for future programs against peers such as Northrop Grumman, RTX, and BAE Systems. The deal also lines up with rising interest in counter drone systems, autonomous mission management, and data fusion across platforms where on board processing is critical. At the same time, Lockheed Martin is dealing with legal, regulatory, and software execution issues elsewhere in the business, so partnerships like this are only one piece of a broader mix of risks and potential rewards.

How This Fits Into The Lockheed Martin Narrative​

  • The focus on neuromorphic, low power AI on custom chips supports the narrative that Lockheed Martin is investing in next generation technologies to keep its defense platforms aligned with customer priorities.
  • This collaboration raises the bar on technological execution, which sits alongside existing concerns in the narrative about software, program complexity, and cost risk on large, long running programs.
  • The specific angle of embedding AI directly into application specific chips near the sensor is not fully reflected in a story centered on platforms, budgets, and backlog, even though it could influence competitive position in future bids.

From here, it is worth watching for concrete program wins that mention neuromorphic AI or ForwardEdge chips, rather than viewing this as only a technology announcement. Investor materials, contract disclosures, and comments from aerospace and defense customers may help show whether this partnership flows into backlog and segment mix over time. It may also be useful to track how often Lockheed Martin highlights AI on custom silicon when discussing competitive bids versus Northrop Grumman, RTX, or BAE Systems, as that can indicate how central this approach is to future product roadmaps.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 58 users

IloveLamp

Top 20
Not sure if this has been posted. Assuming it is written by ai, however the details are fascinating. Dyor

1000021569.jpg
1000021572.jpg
1000021575.jpg
1000021578.jpg
1000021581.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 13 users

Townyj

Ermahgerd
Not sure if this has been posted. Assuming it is written by ai, however the details are fascinating. Dyor

View attachment 96410 View attachment 96411 View attachment 96412 View attachment 96413 View attachment 96414
Not This guy again.. he posts a lot of Misinformation. Pretty sure he uses AI to create all of his Posts and just spams for "Likes/Views"

Could also be a "Bot" Account.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 11 users

CHIPS

Regular
Not sure if this has been posted. Assuming it is written by ai, however the details are fascinating. Dyor

View attachment 96410 View attachment 96411 View attachment 96412 View attachment 96413 View attachment 96414

Careful, this guy posts a lot of AI-made nonsense ☝️
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 12 users

schuey

Regular
Not sure if this has been posted. Assuming it is written by ai, however the details are fascinating. Dyor

View attachment 96410 View attachment 96411 View attachment 96412 View attachment 96413 View attachment 96414
IF this is fact it is the BIGGEST news we have ever had in my opinion
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 5 users

Mt09

Regular
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 8 users

IloveLamp

Top 20
Careful, this guy posts a lot of AI-made nonsense ☝️
I appreciate that. I still find the premis fascinating. I personally have suspected involvement with elon musk for a few years.

I find it very difficult to believe that NASA and FG amongst some of the biggest names in defence (Lockheed, afrl, rtx etc etc) are all workiing with akida and space x / tesla is not........? Unlikely imo.

Particularly given the space x / nasa collaborations.

Plus, the AI needs to pull it's information from somewhere......

Dyor
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 19 users

7For7

Regular
And this



IMG_0893.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 23 users

rgupta

Regular
Hi Hopa

i tried to clarify this in my mind a week or so ago by asking Grok.

I asked again now and this is the response of what is role does which seems to align clearly with what we are seeing him do “blogging and evangelizing IBM’s capabilities”:

Kevin D. Johnson is a Field CTO at IBM, specifically focused on HPC (High-Performance Computing), AI, LLMs (Large Language Models), and Quantum Computing. His full title is often listed as Field CTO – HPC, AI, LLM & Quantum Computing | Principal HPC Cloud Technical Specialist at IBM.

What the Role Involves (Simply)​

As a Field CTO, Kevin acts as a senior technical leader and expert advisor who works directly with clients, partners, and internal teams in the field (not just in headquarters). His responsibilities include:

  • Providing deep technical guidance on IBM's advanced technologies like Spectrum Symphony (for workload orchestration), GPFS/Storage, LSF, and emerging AI/HPC solutions.
  • Helping customers deploy and optimize these tools in demanding environments (government, research, finance, etc.).
  • Exploring and prototyping cutting-edge integrations (e.g., with neuromorphic chips like BrainChip Akida, Palantir Foundry, or distributed AI setups) to demonstrate real-world value.
  • Speaking, blogging, and evangelizing IBM's capabilities through demos, articles, and community posts (he's very active on IBM Community and LinkedIn).
  • Bridging between IBM's engineering/R&D and real customer needs — he's hands-on with code, architectures, and proofs-of-concept.
It's a senior, influential role — not the overall IBM CTO (that's someone else), but a specialized Field CTO who has significant autonomy to innovate and influence in his domain (HPC/AI/Quantum). He often builds and shares personal prototypes (like the targeting system with Symphony + Akida + Foundry) to showcase possibilities, even if they're not yet official IBM products.

In short: He's an expert "technical ambassador" for IBM's high-end computing and AI tech, working with clients and the ecosystem to push boundaries and solve complex problems.


apparently they have multiple field CTO’s but IBM doesn’t disclose how many.
To my understanding IBM is one of the oldest technology players. With onset of LLMs and especially Claude, a lot of IBM platforms are at risk to AI.
With every risk there comes an opportunity to safegaurd your business and other’s as well.
So to me what Kevin is saying is that add a physical ai layer to your systems so that LLM based AI cannot kill your business.
We all know IBM is also developing neurophonic products but may be they are not much near to commercialisation, while akida is readily avaiable.
So yes he is working in best interest of his employer IBM, but he may feel obliged to use akida to protect and prosper his business.
Social media provides a lot of advertisement.
Dyor
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 8 users

miaeffect

Oat latte lover
And this



View attachment 96416
aaak1773550771_237062990.gif

Now even this bird can access to the blog knows the importance of Akida
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users
Hopefully Karla will be working with Akida (my highlight). All the best to her.



Karla Sanchez
3w

I’m excited to announce that I’ve accepted an offer with Raytheon (RTX) as a 2026 Software Engineering Intern. I’ll be at the Space & Airborne Systems headquarters in McKinney, TX, working on real-time embedded systems that integrate software and hardware for aerospace and defense applications. I’m grateful for the support that’s helped me get here. Embedded systems have been a major focus for me, and I’m excited to take on the challenges ahead as I continue growing in this field!
  • No alternative text description for this image
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 9 users
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users

Earlyrelease

Regular
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users

Diogenese

Top 20
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users
Top Bottom