Newk R
Regular
Deal with it if someone quotes your post. And come down. You take it to personal. This getting ridiculous. And now move on or ignor me thanks
Deal with it if someone quotes your post. And come down. You take it to personal. This getting ridiculous. And now move on or ignor me thanks
Maybe you also need to know, not only how to read, but to understand the written.You show lack of respect for long term shareholders who have opinions on what they think is a pass or a fail for the past 12 months.
People are investing into a company not in a slot machine.
Clearly the place for you is crown and not investing in a company.
RED or BLACK?
You show lack of respect for long term shareholders who have opinions on what they think is a pass or a fail for the past 12 months.
People are investing into a company not in a slot machine.
Clearly the place for you is crown and not investing in a company.
RED or BLACK?
Maybe your last sentence sucks. Like, you're an idiot, but hey it's just my opinion.
We just don't want to go down the same path as Graphcore. Is that okay with you?
Maybe they get a free boob lift."augmenting our machine learning personnel and solution architects"
They get extra doughnuts at morning tea.
You might be right. I don't think our role is to motivate the management, but I do think a part of the CEO's job is to keep the SP stable and not drift, if possible.It's really amusing how some people here get cold feet when it goes down again. And also how they take everything personally in an anonymous forum. They criticize a company they're invested in because of its chart performance, they criticize people in a negative way because they don't like the share price, they criticize people who have multiples of IQ than themselves, they criticize people who have already achieved remarkable achievements before BrainChip. BUT when you then criticize them for their comments, they get personal and freak out. Exactly my humor. Self-reflection zero. They don't think about whether this negative feedback is motivating or demotivating for the management. (No wonder they doesn't care and may even make fun of the kindergarten behavior of some investors.) unfortunately, these also drag the others along! Stay tuned
Just realised probably his daughter?View attachment 59944![]()
Experience Google Cloud Next 25
Save the date! #GoogleCloudNext is back in Las Vegas on April 9–11, 2025.cloud.withgoogle.com
The work of a CEO is not to control the share price so that it does not fall. If you think it's that easy, then you haven't understood how it works despite years of stock market experience. He has no influence when some are impatient and sell. How is he supposed to support the price? There are enough advancements that should give the management and stock support.. But some want quick money and get out because it takes too long for them. What can the CEO do about that? Have you not noticed the progress in recent years?You might be right. I don't think our role is to motivate the management, but I do think a part of the CEO's job is to keep the SP stable and not drift, if possible.
In the past, BRN SP has been remarkably stable, even without announcements. But now you can not say the same.
There is a lot of FOMO. Just look at the SP immediately before and after the release of the annual results. Looking at this, the SP is fluctuating wildly, because the licensing announcements, if there are any that could be made, are not made. It makes you kind of glad the ASX hands out speeding tickets so the SP doesnt rise to $2, and drift back to 33c leaving mums and dads in the lurch.
None of us want to be forced to watch the SP daily in case they need to sell down. But that is what management is giving us.
If you simply feel that SP management isn't a part of the CEO's role then we have a simple difference of opinion and we can move on.
I agree and am surprised that they have chosen to do the Capital Call this close to the AGM and including the end of the Financial Year.In the absence of a concrete announcement concerning commercial progress, the SP will continue to drift IMO. An announcement like this morning's will feed into that...............
It didn’t say programmers it said personnel to support accelerating market adoption of 2.0.Why do we need extra money for ML programmers when no one has signed a license agreement? How odd. Still, you have to admire their chutzpa a month and a half before the strike vote.
Say hi to your friend for me.The work of a CEO is not to control the share price so that it does not fall. If you think it's that easy, then you haven't understood how it works despite years of stock market experience. He has no influence when some are impatient and sell. How is he supposed to support the price? There are enough advancements that should give the management and stock support.. But some want quick money and get out because it takes too long for them. What can the CEO do about that? Have you not noticed the progress in recent years? Asking for a friend
Have you ever been a CEO? It doesn't sound like it because increasing the value of the company is most certainly on a CEO's to do list. How do I know? Well, I've been one a couple of times and protecting the value of the enterprise is always high on the list of things a CEO is judged by, as well as the Chair. As I have said many times, I remain a loyal fan of the technology but am concerned at the lack of commercial progress and management's transparency, or lack of it, around that issue. There remains a whiff of arrogance around their conduct which I find disagreeable........The work of a CEO is not to control the share price so that it does not fall. If you think it's that easy, then you haven't understood how it works despite years of stock market experience. He has no influence when some are impatient and sell. How is he supposed to support the price? There are enough advancements that should give the management and stock support.. But some want quick money and get out because it takes too long for them. What can the CEO do about that? Have you not noticed the progress in recent years?